https://eu.azcentral.com/story/opinion/op-ed/2019/01/28/downtown-phoenix-photo-men-soot-blackface/2683881002/ Here's one of the articles, by butt hurt liberals.

As I said, the Democrats used to support the wall, even back when GWB was President and was against the wall. Democrats in 2008 Democrats had the battle of identity politics on who to have run for President.  Being black won over having a vagina. Obama kept playing identity politics and race baiting everything. When Trump decided to run and said he wanted the wall, Democrats had to take the opposite stance.

This is the guy who stole the dog. [image: 109241_DxVsLD_WwAEx4oS.jpg]

But that's the problem. Liberals rarely, if ever, to shout down the scum on their own side. The Women's March is rampant with misandry, anti-white, anti-semitism, anti-LGBT and countless other vile things.    The Women's March fell apart because they didn't want honkies taking part, so they canceled the marches.  Now that it's virtually dead, the "moderate" liberals are finally coming out to condemn the organizers, but not the hate-filled messages of the march. It's "racist" to point out the fact that muslims from Pakistan/Afghanistan make up about 2% of the UK population while making up over 89% of the rape gangs.  Victims were threatened by police, social services and all levels of government if they spoke publically about the problems. It took over 7 years before a "moderate" muslim came on UK TV to denounce 9/11.  Off the top of my head, I can't remember his name, but it was the guy the SPLC claimed was an anti-muslim racist even though he's a muslim.  The SPLC settled the lawsuit and paid him a ton of cash for lying about him. In the guise of "diversity", Yahoo and HuffPo purged all the men above the 2nd rung of management.  HuffPo even tweeted "this is what diversity looks like" with all women, except no black women. The BBC loves to spout the "gender wage gap" lie.  When the BBC did their own employee salary audit, the vast majority of those who were underpaid was men.  So, in reality, the BBC was guilty but in the completely opposite way of the lie, they continue to spew even today. Liberals never, ever call out feminism. Liberals never, ever call out socialism.  "But, those brown people did it wrong, us whities will do it right". Liberals never, ever call out their racism of low expectations. Liberals never, ever condemn Antifa, BAMN, etc, etc, etc Liberals lie about facts, to suit their narratives.    They claim that all whites, are racist over 1 incident, that turned out to be a total lie by the victim's mom.    They claim that non-whites, especially blacks, are the main victims of whites in violent crimes.  Obama's DOJ (run by 2 blacks during Obama's 8 years) showed that whites were nearly 7x more likely to be victims of blacks in violent crimes than the other way around.    They lie about the stats.  In all "whites vs ****" stats, whites are the victims more than the other racial group.    I guess Obama's white half used white supremacy to fake the stats. Virtually everyone agrees that racist white people are assholes.  Sadly, liberals justify racism by non-whites with the Dictionary fallacy. There's been a rise in hate crimes.  Not surprisingly, the rate of fake hate crimes has skyrocketed.    Many hate crimes are straight up fake as fuck.  Others, like those black chicks on the bus (Michigan U ????), used "hate crime" to get out of the shit they were in for their own actions. Tawanna Brawley, back in the 1980s, was out whoring.  She came home late so she and her mother faked the gang rape by white cops.    Al Sharpton jumped on that shit quickly.  Even after he found out it was a total lie, he kept up the lie to promote racial strife.

All social media conspired against conservatives, which created the blacklash that help Trump win. Now+ payment platforms are getting into the act. I don't know how old you are, but it was liberals that fought for free speech which they are now demanding be banned.  It's liberals that fought against Jim Crow laws, which they now want to bring back.

Canada has multiple levels of taxation, there's a federal goods and services tax (GST) and provincial sales tax (PST). These would be equivalent to the VAT. Where I live there's no provincial tax on natural gas but some provinces charge PST and others charge the "carbon tax" on top of that. And oh yes the federal government charges the GST on natural gas regardless of where you live. With exceptions like fuel, the federal government can't tax natural resources as it's under provincial jurisdiction but they are trying hard to impose a "carbon tax" on provinces to virtue signal and ensure a steady flow of revenue for their vanity projects under the disguise of "environmental concern". Liberal policies are reverse Robin Hood schemes. It's a shame so many people believe in their crap, but I guess it takes a while for people to realize they are being fooled.

Umm, did you read what I posted?  I mentioned the stuff you just said.  I also showed the false results for both prostate and breast screening. By your "logic", we should end breast cancer screening based on the numbers from the links I posted earlier. Breast cancer screening has a 52% false positive rate.  End that shit since it's so unreliable.  Oh wait, we won't because VAGINA. Also, you clearly missed the main bit of the prostate cancer topic in this thread.  The UK does not have a prostate cancer screening program, at all.  It's not about age, but about not doing it for prostate cancer at all. The UK has a breast cancer screening program for women, despite the 52% false positive rate. The UK (at least in Scotland) still doesn't give males the HPV vaccine.  The excuse is that if you protect the vagina, then males will be covered too.  HOWEVER, not all males shag women.  ALSO, not all women get the vaccine.    Despite the fact that males are harder affected by it, who fucking cares, because vagina.

I'm not in France, so I can only go by what I see in the media. The rich got tax cuts, while Macron piled on taxes that seriously hurt the middle class. Another problem is that 79% of French citizens say that they have had enough unfettered immigration.  As part of this uncontrolled immigration, taxes have had to go up to support these people. Many of the things happening in France are happening in the rest of the west. Sweden had to raise its retirement age from 60 to 69 to fund the welfare for the migrants.  Previously, they had a 5 year surplus in their state pension fund, meaning they could have lowered the retirement age to 55.  That is a 14 year loss in their state pension fund, solely due to migrants coming to the country so they can get welfare.

No one is really "free" but the US is the free-est country there is, thanks to its constitution. Military controlled countries are far from free, though free-er than religious controlled countries.