Well the old saying goes that there are so many laws here that everyone is guilty of something, which astonishes me that they haven't been able to find anything… That's actually surprising and I think it plays a part in what's driving them nuts. There must be something! Find it! It's Hillary running the DNC like the Wicked Witch of the West - FLY FLY MY PRETTIES!!! HAHAHAHA!!! I guess they'll have to write some more laws. Too bad they've broken the law by conducting this charade, which is not in their Constitutional mandate or authority. When all is said and done, they're digging themselves deeper in a hole - I used to say he was giving them enough rope to hang themselves, now it's that they're ripping open the pit wide enough to swallow them whole for all eternity and like moths to the flame, too blind to see. If Trump had fired Mueller, we wouldn't really be talking about how the Democrats colluded with Russia by selling them Uranium. We'd instead be talking about how he fired Mueller and "obstructed justice." But now that he didn't fall into their trap, their done. Hillary paid Russia for the Dossier, which is the only "proof" but never verified as actual evidence, and they claim Trump colluded with Russia? What's the problem here? Why do Democrats not seem to understand that Hillary paying Russia for a fake story IS collusion - which they are accusing Trump of? Why do they keep claiming Trump colluded when they literally did? The American people are fed up with the lies.

If he was a conservative, the liberals would have had him doxxed in a couple of hours.

@RandomPDownl: I'm specifically looking for these types of stories. It's interesting how people respond to them on both sides. The left loves these stories, as it proves them right about the evil right.    Once the truth comes out, they drop the story and never mention it again because they already got their "evil right" narrative out there. Oddly, with Jussie Smollett, there's still a lot of liberals defending him.  Some are calling him a hero for trying to expose the evil right, even if it was a hoax. I hate hoaxes because it can destroy real lives of people falsely accused of the crimes.  That for example Jackie @ UVA.  The "just believe" crowd did $25,000 damage to the frat house based on lies.  The university refused to protect the students and fraternity, then refused to pay for the damages when they were proven innocent.  The frat was banned from classes while the shit was going on and even once they were proven innocent, there was still a push to expell them because something like that might happen and to make an example out of them.

MSM will never say anything positive about Trump.

Shiff said that even if Mauller finds nothing on Trump, Shiff's congressional committee will keep investigating Trump and Co.

All the places that have previously tried it have ended the program because there was no benefit except to those who refuse to work. NOTE:  Before anyone freaks out, I am not talking about those that HONESTLY can't work and need help.

Semitic means Arab. Because it refers to the languages Phoenician, Hebrew, Aramaic, and Arabic. Phoenician is a dead language. Aramaic is spoken by only a few Syrians. Hebrew is not spoke by modern Jews - they speak Yiddish and several other languages. Arabic is the only group left that Semitic refers to. This has to do with a mistranslation. Anti-Semitic means someone who is bigoted against someone who speaks a certain language, and literally nothing to do with Jews. Yet they have leveled this Anti-Semitism against Arabs, who are the majority Semites, to anyone who disagrees with Israel or it's policies. It's absurd. There is a difference between Anti-Semitism and Anti-Zionist. But if you dare speak against Israel then you're an Anti-Semite. It's sick, but it's the world we live in.

@raphjd: "Access Hollywood" refers more of a behind the scenes kind of thing. We know the shine and polish that we tend to get from Hollywood (or any industry) and when they refer to "access" they are claiming it's an honest and open view behind the shine and polish. There was/is a show called "Access Hollywood" that claims that they get the truth because they go to the source rather than the publicists and mouthpieces for the industry. Thanks

@raphjd: I know, CNN is guilty of many, many lies over the last few years alone.

@raphjd: Remoan MP Anna Soubry has a long history of constantly calling Leavers all manner of names, with loads of video evidence. Earlier in the week, she was being interviewed by the BBC about Breixt and the crowd started chanting that she was a nazi.    She reported this to the police as a hate crime and the police are investigating it as such. There's plenty of video and audio of her calling Leavers the exact same thing and many other things, as well.   I watched a video of her discussing Brexit and I stopped counting after she got 17 names she called Leavers, that she deems is a hate crime when used against Remoaners. Why are the "liberals" such massive hypocrites when it comes to things like this?! Oh my.. No comment!

@raphjd: Laura Loomer (a jew) was banned from twitter and some others for being anti-illegal immigration. Louis Farrakah (hates jews and pretty much everyone else, including you, you faggot sodomite) is still spewing his hate on twitter and every other platforms. ???

@mhorndisk1: @raphjd: 9 Turkish muslims did a planned acid attack on gays outside a gay club in Hackney in London, in Novemeber 2018. CCTV shows it was planned as they waited for fags to leave the club before getting out of their cars. The media coverage of this incident has gotten almost no MSM coverage. We have to wonder why that is.  We know when muslims are the victims, the global media reports on it, even when it turns out to be fake. My conclusion is; fag victims don't matter if it makes muslims look bad. Back to the discussion - Muslims will kill you, whereas fags may have a drag queen throw their shoe at you. It's astounding to me that gays will jump along the Linda Sarsour bandcamp and support Islamic refugees just because it goes against Trump - who never did anything bad to gays. It was Clinton who passed Defense of Marriage Act. Now because it's politically convenient, the democrats are pro-gay. The GOP thinks Transexuals are weird, and I'm not a Republican, but I don't think they're morally evil or nefarious because of it. It's not natural because surgery to do that kind of thing is something we only started doing just a few decades ago. I'm not going to hate the Republicans for not accepting trans people. Gays are a different story, and on a case by case basis. Do they hate gays or are they brainwashed and a victim themself? If it's the latter, it's the institution that should be villainized, because attacking them for being indoctrinated is going to make them hate you because they won't understand - then it's your fault.

@raphjd: I just saw a video from NP claiming that he was an actual Vietnam Vet, who was in combat. Funny, the Stolen Valor site shows that he was just a reservist who never deployed.  He claimed to be a Recon Ranger, but was actually a refrigeration tech. His DD-214 (discharge paper) shows that after 4 years, he was only a Pvt, the lowest rank in the Marine Corps.    He was also a multiple deserter and did time in military prison, which is why he was a Pvt. As of 2 days ago, NP changed his story 7 times that I counted yesterday and apparently Fox & Friends counted 2 days ago.    Yeah, I'm a day behind. ::)

@raphjd: Duerst the Wuerst uploaded a video yesterday of a black guy being forced out of an area by a bunch of liberals. The black guy was called every name in the book, pushed, shoved, slammed into, threatened with violence, intimidated (encircled him and gave him "death stares" as Antifa calls them in a few of their videos) and pushed out of a public space by 3 people. It reminds me (minus the overt violence) of the situation in Vancouver where liberals were beating people up with signs saying "No More Hate", "Love Trumps Hate", etc, etc.

@raphjd: The EU protects muslims (who like to fling faggots off roofs) in countless ways, including protecting them from having their religion criticized. The EU allows bigotry against LGBTs by it's member states. If you don't like the EU, you are an islamophobe.  That is what the left tells us. HOWEVER, the truth is if you like the EU you are a self loathing, homophobe.   You support state sanctioned homophobia. I never had heard such an analysis before.. ::)

@raphjd: It's leftists doing search results manipulation. ;D

@mhorndisk1: And now after backtracking his apology, and saying it wasn't him, yet another picture in the same yearbook reveals him wearing the exact same pants as the guy in blackface (he was hoping no one would look at the pants and instead the face). And CNN doubles down, labeling him a Republican again! This after a long campaign labeling his Republican competitor multiple times as a "racist," with no proof. Now liberals are saying they actually think the photo is of Trump. It's pure insanity. :mbounce:

All of the Democrat front-runners are pretty shit for 20 reasons or another.  Every one of them that was in office up to 2014 voted for a border wall. I don't like any of the Repubs either, at least not the usual suspects. At least Trump is standing up to the Dems and forcing the issue of the wall.  I'm shocked that someone hasn't done commercials showing Dems calling for the border wall.