1. It's a job unlike any other and it's definitely not like cooking. It's … sex. And studio owners are absolutely going to want to sleep with some of their more receptive models, whether it's mutual or coerced. I think even ChaosMen's Bryan Ockert has an ongoing thing with one of his models that he talks about in his blog and I've read first-hand accounts how models are drugged up, pimped out, and passed around in sleazier studios. Behind the lens, porn is at the unfortunate intersection of wannabe-glamour, sleaze, and drugs and while I'm sure there are many top studios who strive operate ethically, there are tons of fly-by-night studios who shoot porn and take advantage of their models. I think to pretend otherwise is to be incredibly naive about porn.
And you think it's like cooking?? The frying pan doesn't try to rape you when you're drugged up and high beyond your mind.
2. No, I won't stop body-shaming in this specific instance and I reserve my right to call it out in this specific instance. If I wanted to watch a balding, fat, and aging chub, then I would watch that kind of porn. But my intent is to watch healthy, fit, hunky and toned guys and to see their dicks slobbered on by a guy like Randy Blue is such a waste. Give me another hunky guy to work the cock and fulfill my fantasy. To be clear, I have nothing against balding, fat, and aging chubs in general (in fact, most of my coworkers fit right into this category and I get along wonderfully with them in a professional and personal capacity), but that does NOT mean I can't have physical preferences in my porn fantasies.