• Categories
    • Recent
    • Tags
    • Popular
    • Users
    • Groups
    • Torrents
    • Login

    Girl sues instagram for $5 billion

    Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved Politics & Debate
    3 Posts 2 Posters 7 Views
    Loading More Posts
    • Oldest to Newest
    • Newest to Oldest
    • Most Votes
    Reply
    • Reply as topic
    Log in to reply
    This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
    • B Offline
      blablarg18
      last edited by blablarg18

      "The lawsuit seeking class-action status and $5 billion in damages alleges Meta intentionally got teens hooked on Instagram and knowingly exposed them to harmful content."

      https://www.washingtonpost.com/technology/2024/08/05/meta-lawsuit-teen-mental-health/

      She's both wrong & right.

      Figure out where she's wrong & where she's right

      OK I'll say.

      • it is her parents fault, for not paying attention, being there enough, teaching her love & responsibility

      • but ok, Meta Corp does try to addict people & Meta Corp deserves what Meta Corp will get

      • including Meta's pedo content

      • Twitter 1.0 also spread pedo content - which Elon killed in X / Twitter 2.0

      raphjdR 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
      • raphjdR Offline
        raphjd Forum Administrator @blablarg18
        last edited by

        @blablarg18

        Twitter 1.0 was Jack as king

        Actually, Twitter 1.5 (corporate Twitter) was the worse version for pedo content. Ironically enough, this was the version that spent the most money on preventing "harmful content" while having the most pedo shit.

        According to Congressional hearing testimony, Twitter 1.5 spent over 100 times more than Twitter 1.0 to remove harmful content but had 100 times more pedo content.

        It's similar to YouTube's Ad-apocalypse 3.0 (advertisers refusing to do ads on YouTube) was due to the rampant pedo shit.

        YT's AA 1.0 was due to conservative stuff being on the platform.

        YT's AA 2.0 was because Carla Mazza demanded that advertisers stop giving YT money because they didn't ban Steven Crowder for referring to Carl as a "Lispy Mexican Fag". Not surprisingly, Crowder took that from how Maza referred to himself in several videos and his Twitter and Instagram bios.

        B 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
        • B Offline
          blablarg18 @raphjd
          last edited by

          @raphjd Yes, well stated!

          1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0

          Hello! It looks like you're interested in this conversation, but you don't have an account yet.

          Getting fed up of having to scroll through the same posts each visit? When you register for an account, you'll always come back to exactly where you were before, and choose to be notified of new replies (either via email, or push notification). You'll also be able to save bookmarks and upvote posts to show your appreciation to other community members.

          With your input, this post could be even better 💗

          Register Login
          • 1 / 1
          • First post
            Last post