Google HATES WHITE PEOPLE, New Google Gemini AI REFUSES To Make Pictures Of White People
-
(Pedophilia is rape of the weak & innocent. Desire & action are different, BUT, even person who merely desires to rape the weak & innocent, is indeed evil - until they can acknowledge their desire as evil & reject it, ie. "repent".)
Interesting view. But is a person who rejects the desire and repents not still a pedophile? What would you consider sufficient rejection / repentance?
-
@Rapsey-0 That side track doesn't interest me. My point here is Google AI.
No one should pretend desire is always-neutral because desires may be neutral, or good, or evil. Desire to do something plainly evil, is, of course, evil desire.
As to what is "evil", that can be very debatable at times - EXCEPT, anyone's list of evil should include murder & rape of weak & innocent people. Otherwise they lost the plot.
-
@Rapsey-0 That side track doesn't interest me. My point here is Google AI.
I respect that. I'll try to steer clear of it and limit my point as it pertains to the Google AI.
Libs 100% believe that their morality is a universal truth. That's why they feel it's justified to impose it on the rest of the world, for example by having AI parrot their views on what is good or evil. Doesn't matter what the topic is. Gender-confused children? Race-relations? History? The AI answer should always present their ideas on what is good and what is evil, because they see their moral views as "the truth" and everyone who has a different view is just wrong / stupid / evil.
If you don't like it when the libs use AI as a vehicle to spread their own morality (which they believe to be universal) then why would you want it to spread yours?
My personal wish for the future of AI is that it can be a source of factual information. I would prefer for it not to make any moral claims or judgements, even ones I agree with.
Necessary disclaimer: I 100% believe that anyone who participates in the sexual exploitation of children deserves the most severe punishment.
-
@raphjd https://www.theguardian.com/technology/2024/feb/28/google-chief-ai-tools-photo-diversity-offended-users
So much for yet another conspiracy theory.
-
@Rapsey-0 said in Google HATES WHITE PEOPLE, New Google Gemini AI REFUSES To Make Pictures Of White People:
Libs 100% believe that their morality is a universal truth. That's why they feel it's justified to impose it on the rest of the world
Where to begin with the sheer hypocrisy of that statement? Anti-abortion laws; "don't say gay"; book bans; the illegality of marijuana; the Alabama ruling that a fertilized egg is legally a human; Ghana's recent criminalization of even identifying as LGBTQ+? I would venture to say that "morality laws" and imposing perceived norms and religious beliefs is more of a conservative thing. Liberals in America often need to remind conservative Christians that their god tells them what they can't do - not the rest of us.
-
Anti-murder of babies should be a no-brainer.
"Don't say gay" is something you people made up.
You people also banned books, like To Kill A Mockingbird, Huck Finn, and many more because they used words that offended you.
@jaroonn said in Google HATES WHITE PEOPLE, New Google Gemini AI REFUSES To Make Pictures Of White People:
I would venture to say that "morality laws" and imposing norms and religious beliefs is more of a conservative thing.
You people are enforcing your morals on the rest of us via the law; ie criminalizing disagreeing with trans dogma.
-
@raphjd said in Google HATES WHITE PEOPLE, New Google Gemini AI REFUSES To Make Pictures Of White People:
Anti-murder of babies should be a no-brainer.
I don't know any liberal who murders babies. Whether or not an embryo is a baby or not is a religious vs scientific interpretation. And banning abortion is a perfect example of how the right always tries to legislate their morality.
"Don't say gay" is something you people made up.
Read the Florida law. Whatever you want to call it, it is meant to prevent discussions of LGBTQ+ issues in schools. Whether you agree with it or not, it is a again an example of the right legislating their morality.
You people also banned books, like To Kill A Mockingbird, Huck Finn, and many more because they used words that offended you.
I, and many other liberals, do not agree with this kind of censorship. In fact, To Kill a Mockingbird is one of the books targeted by Moms for Liberty.
I would venture to say that "morality laws" and imposing norms and religious beliefs is more of a conservative thing.
You people are enforcing your morals on the rest of us via the law; ie criminalizing disagreeing with trans dogma.
Please do show us where that law has been enacted. Oh right. You can't. It doesn't exist.
Conservatives have a proven track record of trying to impose their morality and beliefs on the rest of the world. Which "liberal" laws do you object to? Gay marriage? Equal pay for women? Desegregation? Universal suffrage?
Be honest. This is not the hill you want to die on
-
Umm, Canada, New York, UK, and many other places have criminalized violating trans dogma.
A man was sent to prison for 8 years for saying that a trannie politician was actually a man.
"But you're a man though" got a UK man sent to prison.
Jordan Peterson got in trouble for saying he won't use "preferred pronouns" because it's speech dictated by the state.
New York punishes businesses that misgender people, even accidentally, with hefty fines.
-
@jaroonn said in Google HATES WHITE PEOPLE, New Google Gemini AI REFUSES To Make Pictures Of White People:
I, and many other liberals, do not agree with this kind of censorship.
And yet, many liberals have enforced it.
-
@jaroonn said in Google HATES WHITE PEOPLE, New Google Gemini AI REFUSES To Make Pictures Of White People:
Conservatives have a proven track record of trying to impose their morality and beliefs on the rest of the world. Which "liberal" laws do you object to? Gay marriage? Equal pay for women? Desegregation? Universal suffrage?
OK, clearly, you are uneducated.
The DNC has promised to give Gay and Lesbian rights since 1971. Even when they controlled the White House and both houses of Congress they never managed to do it.
The 3 most homophobic laws passed by the federal government were all by the Democrats under Bill Clinton.
DoMA even broke the US Constitution's Full Faith and Credit clause, as well as the Comity clause.
Don't Ask, Don't Tell created witch hunts in the military.
Women have equal pay.
Women can vote. In fact, poor women got the right to vote without any responsibilities, unlike poor men who had to accept the draft and bucket lines. Just having a pussy was enough for them to be able to vote. Also, for the longest time, most women didn't want the right to vote. You also forget that voting was a privilege for landowners, not for the average person. Women owned over 70% of the pubs and inns (until about 1900 when men became the vast majority of owners), which gave them the right to vote.
Funny how it's the Democrats who now support segregation. In fact, you idiots demand it. You demand racially segregated dorms at college, segregated student unions expect for whites of course.
You freaks demand that other people not wear Halloween costumes that you find offensive.
You got to riot and loot during covid lockdowns, but christians and jews could not attend church.
You idiots decriminalized all manner of crimes, and I ain't talking about pot.
You people decriminalized shoplifting, then cried when stores pulled out of your areas, screeching that it's racist.
The list is never ending of the shit YOU PEOPLE did to fuck up society.
-
@raphjd said in Google HATES WHITE PEOPLE, New Google Gemini AI REFUSES To Make Pictures Of White People:
Women can vote. In fact, poor women got the right to vote without any responsibilities, unlike poor men who had to accept the draft and bucket lines. Just having a pussy was enough for them to be able to vote. Also, for the longest time, most women didn't want the right to vote. You also forget that voting was a privilege for landowners, not for the average person. Women owned over 70% of the pubs and inns (until about 1900 when men became the vast majority of owners), which gave them the right to vote.
Very amusing when you refer to the university professor as uneducated. But whatever. Not much of what you write matters much.
Let's start here. Do you not see any gaps in your "scholarly" timeline of voting rights? By your description, only landowners were allowed to vote in 1919? Or are you referring to a country other than the US?
You might want to read up on the history of voting rights before you commit yourself to print. Would save you further embarrassment.
-
You're a "professor"? No wonder colleges are shit now.
Landowners (male and/or female) had the vote, before the general public.
Men (generally speaking) only got the vote, in the US and UK, because we had the draft and bucket lines forced on us.
Women later got the right to vote but with no responsibility to the state.
-
@raphjd said in Google HATES WHITE PEOPLE, New Google Gemini AI REFUSES To Make Pictures Of White People:
Landowners (male and/or female) had the vote, before the general public.
Men (generally speaking) only got the vote, in the US and UK, because we had the draft and bucket lines forced on us.No. Not in the US. All men (theoretically) got the vote with the passage of the 14th Amendment in 1868. It has nothing to do with the draft.
https://www.history.com/news/voting-rights-timeline
I'm really happy you are not in one of my classes. I hate failing students
-
You do know that Jim Crow was one of yours, don't you?
It was the Democrats that prevented certain people from voting.
Men lose the right to vote if they do not register for the draft.
Under Biden, it does not matter if they pretend to be a woman or not. Having a cock (born with one) makes you a man for the draft. So much for trans rights/privileges under the DNC.
I bet you are a feminist too, who screeches about gender equality, except when it does not benefit women; ie the draft.
-
@raphjd Your constant assertion that the modern day Democratic Party is somehow the same as it was in the 19th century is only further proof that you are unable to hold your own in serious discussions. Just give up.
-
Go back and watch the speeches of Democrats over the last 50 years.
Joe Biden has some especially lovely ones.
Hillary Clinton does as well.
Their speeches to support Biden's 1994 Crime bill are very telling.
Of course, to liberals like you, that's ok because they are from the "good" party.
Margaret Sanger is a hero to most Democrats, despite her absolute hatred of non-whites, but especially blacks. She's done more to kill blacks and every Repub combined.
-
BTW, as a liberal, you gotta love how Kamala treated criminals, especially blacks back in California, as AG. She brought back slavery and bragged about it. HOWEVER, she gets a pass because her coochie ain't white and she's on the correct side of the plantation fence.
Also, Dems brought back segregation in the last 15 years or so. I mean, racially segregated dorms, student unions, and all manner of things. The more things "progress" the further backward they go.
Not only are you segregating colleges, but you are even doing it to K-12. You might remember at least 1 Atlanta elementary school racially segregating classrooms. Not to mention things like graduation and other functions and activities.
Hell, Boston (I think it was - Michelle Woo is mayor) had a non-whites only Christmas party for elected officials.
Y'all are about the most racist mother fuckers there are while claiming to be "anti-racist". Then you claim we are wrong when we say that "anti-racist" is dog-whistle for anti-white racism.
-
@raphjd It's so cute watching you pretending to support your "thesis." And the hole just gets deeper.
-
-
@Rapsey-0 "Libs 100% believe that their morality is a universal truth" - Except when they don't. When they'd rather say truth is subjective etc.
"That's why they feel it's justified to impose it on the rest of the world" - Except when they don't ie. when they just don't need justifications.
Your premise is that libs, strange as they are, have motivation that you could make sense of. They don't.
Libs just want to make themselves feel good, moment to moment. They feel uncomfortable except when they can throw a tantrum & get their way.
To libs: Claims of morality, truth, justification, are tactical & disposable. They want pure power. I assume you've read Orwell's 1984 where The Party was English Socialism, Ingsoc. Orwell was embedded with Left, in Spanish Civil War. He saw first-hand how leftists flail wildly in their claims & are deeply murderous.
Google AI would change its answers about gender, race, etc. 180 degrees, if Lib Hive Mind decided one morning that opposite answers were next good tactic - for power.
"My personal wish for the future of AI is that it can be a source of factual information. I would prefer for it not to make any moral claims" - Fine, then Google is unreliable - because it does. It should say "I don't answer those questions".
Hello! It looks like you're interested in this conversation, but you don't have an account yet.
Getting fed up of having to scroll through the same posts each visit? When you register for an account, you'll always come back to exactly where you were before, and choose to be notified of new replies (either via email, or push notification). You'll also be able to save bookmarks and upvote posts to show your appreciation to other community members.
With your input, this post could be even better 💗
Register Login