Vanishing torrents ...
-
@drekkin Yep, I'm aware of the rules and the torrents I've seen deleted didn't break those.
-
@lololulu19 That was me actually....I'm still not sure what happened with that.
The only difference between martyrdom and suicide is press coverage! -
@krad3434 I don't think they remove low quality videos. That would eliminate all the vintage videos of the 70's and 80's.
-
@MrMazda They must have seen your self made video, and decided that you looked like Zeb Atlas, so they deleted it for impersonation.
Have you tried posting it again?
-
@lololulu19 By quality i just mean overall - is the title accurate, is this a file that is easily searchable already, does the torrent contain like 3 copies of the same large files, usually those are handled once comments come in.
Ive sometimes seen something from this site get reuploaded to another torrent site a day after and then re-uploaded here a day after. Those are cases where fast removal makes sense but none are as fast as we've seen fansite videos disappear lately.
It was just me getting at the point that torrents getting removed within an hour or less is unusual even when its for valid reasons, so enormous sweeping accurate DMCA removals feel even less likely, especially somehow instantly recognizing all fansite content in particular.
-
@krad3434 You don't seem to understand how the moderation process works. There is no pre-moderation or review of the torrents that are uploaded here. If a torrent breaks the rules it's up to the community to report it and it will be reviewed by a mod. A torrent can be taken down within minutes of being uploaded if there is a mod online when it's reported. Most of the torrents that break the rules are pretty obvious and are taken down very promptly.
-
@drekkin
At this point I don't know what to say anymore. At no point did i say mods can't remove files for breaking rules, if you can find this, please feel free to directly quote it.You seem to be incredibly convinced that weeks worth of OF files are being removed in minutes due to mods deleting them due to rule breaks.
I am saying that last year there was a thread where people who uploaded content and people who downloaded it noticed patterns to immediate file deletion that lessened during certain times of the day and certain days of the week and then it stopped.
Unless you are the one personally deleting the files you aren't adding anything to the discussion beyond casting doubt on the people who are saying there may be other reasons. Unless you are under the belief they are all being taken down while they are downloaded because they are all breaking the rules linked.
If that's what you believe than that's great. I get it you think every single OF file being removed is only a rule break, you've made it clear. Everyone else seems to think otherwise, especially considering some are updates on files listed on site already.
Thanks for the input.
-
Like there is a moderator on this page saying that their own content got a DMCA takedown, their OWN content and you are wagging the "it must be rules" stick.
I am aware things get removed when they break the rules, I have read them.
-
@krad3434 You seem to have misread or misunderstood what I have written because you have gotten it completely wrong. If you read back on my posts here you will see that I have explained exactly why OF content is being taken down. Creators are embedding it with a "digital fingerprint" that is identified instantly by bots that are searching for copyrighted content and a takedown request is sent out instantly. Perhaps you have confused what I have written with something somebody else wrote.
I was just trying to explain to you that there are multiple reasons why content is removed from the site, not just DMCA takedown requests because you seemed to be under the impression that that is the only reason why torrents are deleted and you didn't understand the torrent moderation process. I wasn't just talking about OF torrents, but all torrents in general, and I never made any assertion about the reasons why they are deleted.
-
@lololulu19 Yes... The new post can be found here
https://www.gaytor.rent/details.php?id=3d650e9acfcd53a7fe9be73a4968c887f967920e8b173681
-
In relation to another thread regarding star ratings being used by users to rate a torrent not following guidelines instead of reporting it because uploader missed out on providing a screenshot.
Are users missing out on them to circumvent what is being discussed in this thread? Is this effective? I have also noticed that these torrents have generic names or a descriptive title and later on would have screenshots uploaded.
-
@krad3434 Can the digital fingerprint be removed by re-encoding the videos?
-
@dilemmax said in Vanishing torrents ...:
Can the digital fingerprint be removed by re-encoding the videos?
This is forbidden ...
removing invisible watermarks in media files are prohibited ...As per part of Site/General Rules:
SEE: https://www.gaytor.rent/rules.php#73 [paragraph/08] -
@john32123666 sorry, I wasn't asking for instruction. I'm only asking because I see a lot of re-encoded videos being shared and it's frustrating because some people over-inflate the quality to increase the size to improve their ratio.
I didn't even know it was possible until you mentioned the rules.
-
It's a sad day when you realised you need new OF videos to have a good time in bed lol
-
Yup, I've had lots of my torrents removed, one contained my favourite Luiggi from O4M scenes, another had Olaf's (one of the most difficult to find O4M models) videos, another a selection of Coroaroludo21cm JustForFans videos.
I even tried to make a "covert" torrent where I changed all the filenames to generic titles, and alluded to the cover-up in the torrent description, and within a few hours it was gone
-
@dilemmax said in Vanishing torrents ...:
@john32123666 sorry, I wasn't asking for instruction. I'm only asking because I see a lot of re-encoded videos being shared and it's frustrating because some people over-inflate the quality to increase the size to improve their ratio.
I didn't even know it was possible until you mentioned the rules.
I don't think most people do it for their ratio.
From my experience, most people do it because they think it makes the video better.
-
@dilemmax That I have no idea of there are likely ways. I doubt most people posting OF dumps are doing that considering some people just post 3 singular images that aren't screencaps for like 40 gigs of videos.
OF doesn't add those automatically, RFC does and their videos aren't removed as fast as some recent fansite posts.
I'm not even sure it's the issue at all.
Digital prints are mainly for finding who uploaded them, not just general removal.
Additionally the file would need to be actually downloaded to use the finger print and the action would be banning that persons account.The re-encoded videos I like are the ones that generally keep the quality and reduce the size. The ai enhanced upscaling is very hit or miss for retro videos but always cool to see for videos that don't have much bigger than like 480x480 around lol.
-
Digital prints are mainly for finding who uploaded them, not just general removal.
Additionally the file would need to be actually downloaded to use the finger print and the action would be banning that persons account.well explained ...
-
Each sites uses a unique id/tools when you join a membership ...
Once you downloaded their content each file is automatically marked w/ your user id ...
Once they find out any suspicious activities you will be block immediately and a letter of damages will followed ...
Hello! It looks like you're interested in this conversation, but you don't have an account yet.
Getting fed up of having to scroll through the same posts each visit? When you register for an account, you'll always come back to exactly where you were before, and choose to be notified of new replies (either via email, or push notification). You'll also be able to save bookmarks and upvote posts to show your appreciation to other community members.
With your input, this post could be even better 💗
Register Login