• Categories
    • Recent
    • Tags
    • Popular
    • Users
    • Groups
    • Torrents
    • Login

    Boomerang? DOJ admission it over-collected evidence in Trump raid creates new legal drama

    Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved Politics & Debate
    3 Posts 2 Posters 13 Views
    Loading More Posts
    • Oldest to Newest
    • Newest to Oldest
    • Most Votes
    Reply
    • Reply as topic
    Log in to reply
    This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
    • raphjdR Offline
      raphjd Forum Administrator
      last edited by

      https://justthenews.com/government/courts-law/doj-admits-it-took-trumps-passports-offers-return-them

      So, the DOJ/FBI, in their zeal to gather evidence took stuff they had no legal right to take and are now "offering" to return the stuff.

      Anyone with a brain, knows they will only return the stuff after photocopying, photographing or whatever everything they illegally took.

      H 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
      • H Offline
        hubrys @raphjd
        last edited by

        @raphjd Your statement displays that you've never participated in a seizure of evidence under warrant or subpoena.

        For example, a warrant will tell law enforcement to seize specific documents, but it will also include language that tells LE to seize any documents within the same container or containers stored similar to those containing named documents. This catch-all language is almost always included in warrants, and excess property is routinely seized. This is why the owner is given a receipt for all of the property seized, which Trump did, in fact, receive.

        Were you under the impression that the FBI were going to pop a squat in the middle of the room and go thru each box of voluminous materials before removing them from the premises? Not even back at headquarters are the agents going thru the boxes. That's a task that some poor document review attorney had to do.

        I'm sure you thought this was something, but you've got nothing here.

        raphjdR 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 1
        • raphjdR Offline
          raphjd Forum Administrator @hubrys
          last edited by

          @hubrys

          Nice excuse. The warrant was vague enough to allow them to do what they did.

          I noticed you didn't deny that they will make copies of everything they took illegally.

          1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0

          Hello! It looks like you're interested in this conversation, but you don't have an account yet.

          Getting fed up of having to scroll through the same posts each visit? When you register for an account, you'll always come back to exactly where you were before, and choose to be notified of new replies (either via email, or push notification). You'll also be able to save bookmarks and upvote posts to show your appreciation to other community members.

          With your input, this post could be even better 💗

          Register Login
          • 1 / 1
          • First post
            Last post