Why people need to lead by example
-
@raphjd said in Why people need to lead by example:
Are you saying we haven't heard that kind of thing from white liberals before?
No, he's saying the image you posted was, like much of your material, FAKE
Why would it be incumbent on someone who simply showed your image to be fake to otherwise completely dismantle your "argument" - you posted a FAKE photo in support of a flawed (and racist) argument... he doesn't have to go farther!
-
Says the person who gets his news from Joy "I was hacked" Reid, The Root, Slate, and Salon.
-
@raphjd said in Why people need to lead by example:
Says the person who gets his news from Joy "I was hacked" Reid, The Root, Slate, and Salon.
That's the ticket! If you don't like the news, point out how bad the TV is!
For the record, I've never quoted from any of those places (and still know next-to-nothing of Joy "why-does-@raphjd-hate-me-so-much" Reid) LOL
-
Those are the places, that I know of, that claimed Kylke Rittenhouse killed 3 black men, even after the trial. Maybe you got your news from some "news" outlet I never heard of.
You also REFUSED to read the actual arrest affidavit that I linked to but claimed I was lying.
Likewise, you did the same with other links only to claim I was lying.
You can't even read the exact words written on a website without claiming it says the opposite of what is actually written on the page; ie Mayo Clinic.
-
@raphjd said in Why people need to lead by example:
Those are the places, that I know of, that claimed Kylke Rittenhouse killed 3 black men, even after the trial. Maybe you got your news from some "news" outlet I never heard of.
You also REFUSED to read the actual arrest affidavit that I linked to but claimed I was lying.
Likewise, you did the same with other links only to claim I was lying.
You can't even read the exact words written on a website without claiming it says the opposite of what is actually written on the page; ie Mayo Clinic.
you shit-for-brains moron
- I've told you a dozen times that when we had that conversation, I was focused on the number 3, not the race - maybe because I don't look for racism in every nook and cranny.
- I've equally as many times explained that when the CDC and hospitals (Mayo clinic and others) reported that the vaccines would prevent you from getting CIVID-19, they meant 2 things - that any RATIONAL person would understand (which, admittedly precludes @raphjd):
FIRST, they meant you in the ploural - you was referencing the population, not the individual
SECOND, they meant you wouldn't get SICK from COVID-19, not that there would be a magical barrier that would prevent the virus from entering your body.
-
Kyle didn't kill 3 people, so you got that wrong too. You were trying to make it racist by claiming that he killed blacks. You got sucked into the DNC narrative of "white supremacy".
Fauci, Biden, the CDC, the Mayo Clinic, and many others said that if you get the vaccine, you will not get or spread covid. That is the actual wording. Leave it to you to make up your own meaning to what was actually said.
I knew it was a lie from the start because that's not how vaccines work, but your fellow liberals got butt hurt and said it would because St Fauci, et al said it would.
-
@raphjd said in Why people need to lead by example:
Kyle didn't kill 3 people, so you got that wrong too. You were trying to make it racist by claiming that he killed blacks. You got sucked into the DNC narrative of "white supremacy".
Fauci, Biden, the CDC, the Mayo Clinic, and many others said that if you get the vaccine, you will not get or spread covid. That is the actual wording. Leave it to you to make up your own meaning to what was actually said.
I knew it was a lie from the start because that's not how vaccines work, but your fellow liberals got butt hurt and said it would because St Fauci, et al said it would.
You really do have selective memory don't you! We weren't discussing "killing black men" we were discussing "shooting victims" - the fact that one survived didn't change the fact that he (too) was a victim...
Yeah! That's the ticket! You KNEW all along what they REALLY meant, but it was the LIBERALS who got it wrong.
The fact is, a LOT of Liberal politicians got the "science" wrong - and some of them DID claim that the vaccines could/would do things no other vaccine could/would do... but not the scientists... they never claimed the vaccines were 100% effective, they never claimed "if you get the vaccine, you won't get the virus" - indeed, they didn't even claim "if you get the vaccine, you won't get sick"!! As with most science, they talked in percentages and likelihoods... not absolutes.
But at the time, the politician we were all listening to was Trump, not Pelosi or Schumer or Biden....
-
@raphjd Kyle Rittenhouse killed two people and wounded another. That is a fact, that even his defender didn't say that he didn't. The question was, if it was murder or self defense.
-
@serenity said in Why people need to lead by example:
@raphjd Kyle Rittenhouse killed two people and wounded another. That is a fact, that even his defender didn't say that he didn't. The question was, if it was murder or self defense.
What? are you saying he murdered the survivor?
(Just pulling a @raphjd on you there!)Can we get back to the original post? You posted a doctored photo in support of your "everyone else is as racist - or more so - than me" theory... and got called out on it.
I think if I were you, I'd just delete the whole conversation here... call it a mea culpa, and move on... you have the power LOL
-
@serenity said in Why people need to lead by example:
@raphjd Kyle Rittenhouse killed two people and wounded another. That is a fact, that even his defender didn't say that he didn't. The question was, if it was murder or self defense.
I know who he killed and who he shot.
I also know he didn't shoot or kill drop kick man, who was black.
-
@raphjd "I also know he didn't shoot or kill drop kick man, who was black", where in my comment have I mensioned any of this?
-
Can you guys take the Kyle Rittenhouse shit back to the forum thread where it belongs, so that this thread can get back to the real subject: raphjd posted a doctored photograph and is refusing to acknowledge his mistake.
-
Ok, so that pic in the OP was fake, but as I showed later in the thread, we have heard that kind of thing before from white liberals.
-
@raphjd said in Why people need to lead by example:
but as I showed later in the thread, we have heard that kind of thing before from white liberals.
“On Christmas Eve, I sent a satirical tweet about an imaginary concept, ‘white genocide’. For those who haven’t bothered to do their research, ‘white genocide’ is an idea invented by white supremacists and used to denounce everything from inter-racial relationships to multicultural policies.... It is a figment of the racist imagination, it should be mocked, and I’m glad to have mocked it. White supremacy is on the rise, and we must fight it by any means.”
- George Ciccariello-Maher
-
Yeah, he only claimed it was "satirical" after the backlash.
It's like that TikTok celeb who made comments about trans-people, then when there was a backlash, she claimed to be trans.
-
Well, first, we need to reiterate as frequently as we can that you've been caught now spreading fake, edited photographs and that needs to be a millstone hung around your neck from now on, and I encourage all of your frequent opponents on here to consistently and constantly throw it in your face.
Second, I'm amazed it never occurs to you how absurd your reliance upon this example to prove "how all liberals think." Even if we assume that this professor was not being satirical, what was the response? He was condemned by his liberal college and forced onto administrative leave.
"Drexel became aware today of Associate Professor George Ciccariello-Maher's inflammatory tweet, which was posted on his personal Twitter account on Dec[ember] 24, 2016. While the University recognizes the right of its faculty to freely express their thoughts and opinions in public debate, Professor Ciccariello-Maher's comments are utterly reprehensible, deeply disturbing, and do not in any way reflect the values of the University. The University is taking this situation very seriously. We contacted Ciccariello-Maher today to arrange a meeting to discuss this matter in detail."
In other words, you focused on what one dumbass said and universalized it onto all liberals while actively ignoring the response from liberals to that statement. It's almost like you're a biased asshat.
-
-
@raphjd said in Why people need to lead by example:
I never said anything about ALL liberals.
Then please delineate the specific, discrete, and distinct liberals that you were referring to. If you truly were not casting aspersions about all liberals, then you should easily tell me explicitly and in detail which specific liberals you were directing your comments.
If you can't do the above, then you were obviously making generalized statements about a category of peoples and the quoted language from you above is a pitiful defense.
Also, you posted a fake photograph.
-
-
@raphjd said in Why people need to lead by example:
A fake photo.
You lie.Your original post is a fake photograph that has been edited. Are you seriously denying it?
Hello! It looks like you're interested in this conversation, but you don't have an account yet.
Getting fed up of having to scroll through the same posts each visit? When you register for an account, you'll always come back to exactly where you were before, and choose to be notified of new replies (either via email, or push notification). You'll also be able to save bookmarks and upvote posts to show your appreciation to other community members.
With your input, this post could be even better 💗
Register Login