AG Garland and conflict of interest
-
@raphjd said in AG Garland and conflict of interest:
Yet another topic that you side with libersals.
I know you are an idiotic liberal, but the conflict of interest is a no brainer.
Garland's official stance, as the head of the DOJ, that being opposed to CRT being taught in public schools is "domestic terrorism" while his son-in-law is actively selling CRT shit to public schools.
So simple, liberals are too stupid to get it.
well, I guess we've found yet another topic on which you are clueless as to how "the real world" works...
I'm not surprised, the US and the west have very different rules than Mother Russia...
You'll catch on eventually... keep trying!
-
Now it's clear why you voted for Hunter's daddy.
AGAIN since you are an idiot.
Garland's official stance as the head of the DOJ is; If you disagree with the anti-white racist shit my son-in-law is selling to public schools, I will treat you like a domestic terrorist.
I would have thought that even you would have been able to understand that.
-
@raphjd said in AG Garland and conflict of interest:
Now it's clear why you voted for Hunter's daddy.
AGAIN since you are an idiot.
Garland's official stance as the head of the DOJ is; If you disagree with the anti-white racist shit my son-in-law is selling to public schools, I will treat you like a domestic terrorist.
I would have thought that even you would have been able to understand that.
You're such a tool... If Merrick Garland said he prefers Post Toasties in ads for breakfast cereals - even though his son-in-law works for Kellogg's - it's a breach of "family ethics", but it's not a "conflict of interest".
The fact that Garland's DOJ and his son-in-law's opinions about CRT are both leftist is NOT a conflict of interest! And if Garland "goes too far" in his defense of CRT, that's professional misconduct - but it's not a "conflict of interest" just because his son-in-law supports the same viewpoint - in his job.
What would become a conflict of interest would be if the DOJ started to investigate the company his son-on-law worked for... or even a "direct competitor" of theirs... something that would be directly beneficial (or detrimental) to his son-in-law (or his employer) in his official capacity... and that conflict would be easily solved by his recusal from all decisions regarding those cases.
Look, Comrade - word choices matter.
I'm not defending Garland's position on CRT - but it's not a conflict of interest. Its also not embezzlement, rape, treason, assault and battery, or jaywalking!
-
You are such a twat.
Garland is protecting, with the threat of the full force of the DOJ, his son-in-law's business.
I can't believe that even you are so fucking ignorant not to see that, but you are a liberal.
-
@raphjd Garland is self destructing, losing whatever credibility he had. He certainly is far more interested in protecting himself than doing his job.
I think they should hang Garland on the White House Christmas Tree!
-
@lololulu19 said in AG Garland and conflict of interest:
@raphjd Garland is self destructing, losing whatever credibility he had. He certainly is far more interested in protecting himself than doing his job.
I think they should hang Garland on the White House Christmas Tree!
Surprise! Surprise! Surprise!
Trumpites don't like the Attorney General!
News at 11! Dog chases cat!
The Trumpites didn't like THEIR OWN Attorneys General, WTF makes you think they'll like a DEMOCRAT one?
Well GOOOOLLLLLYYYY! Gee Sergeant! I never thought of it THAT way! Surprise! Surprise! Surprise!
-
You can stop slurping Garland's back vag, he won't do the same for any business you are part of, because it doesn't benefit his family.
-
@raphjd said in AG Garland and conflict of interest:
You can stop slurping Garland's back vag, he won't do the same for any business you are part of, because it doesn't benefit his family.
In my experience, Trumpites do not like ANY kind of law enforcement that might include "investigation" or "research" - mainly because they build most everything they do out of paper mache, mirrors, and deception. "Investigations" reveal these things, so NONE of the investigative arms of law enforcement are "good" for the Trumpites...
I personally expect Merrick Garland to enforce the laws of the United States - regardless of who comes under scrutiny: whether a streetwalker or the person the street is named after - up to, and including, POTUS: current and former (all of the former)! That's all! Not a big task. I think he's up to it (as I think Jeff Sessions was up to it, as were Eric Holder and Bill Barr - I don't honestly remember any others that far back.... and isn't that the point? Other than maybe the Kennedys, who remembers the AG? They're not supposed to be "famous" - they're just supposed to do the damned job!)
The Trumps are crooked and DEATHLY afraid of investigations... you can COUNT on their raising a huge stink when the AG comes knocking (not likely until after the Jan 6 commission finishes up).
-
"I would expect" is the dumbest state ever made about a politician or a political appointee.
AND ONCE AGAIN, just for you, Garland is using his position as the head of the DOJ to protect his son-in-law's business, that of selling CRT shit to schools, by labeling parents that are against teaching kids CRT in schools as domestic terrorists.
I know, you will never, ever be able to understand such a simple concept.
-
@raphjd said in AG Garland and conflict of interest:
AND ONCE AGAIN, just for you, Garland is using his position as the head of the DOJ to protect his son-in-law's business, that of selling CRT shit to schools, by labeling parents that are against teaching kids CRT in schools as domestic terrorists.
I know, you will never, ever be able to understand such a simple concept.
You silly twit - you really will believe anything they feed you, won't you.
There is nothing illegal about the CRT materials, and they are being sold to schools, not forced upon them.
Schools: Colleges and Universities, not middle schools for chrissake!
Garland is not hawking them, nor promoting the materials sold by his son-in-law.
Whether the classification of protesters against the CRT materials are "domestic terrorists" would depend on how they protested! And that would be the purview of the government to decide... if I could only think of the name of the department... not the Army, not Space Force, not the VA, not the Interior Department, not the Parks Department, not the Capitol Visitor's Bureau....
Oh! Yeah! That would be the JUSTICE DEPARTMENT - headed by Attorney General... damn, if he would only do his job!
Oh! yeah! That's exactly what he IS doing!
-
More word games to justify your bullshit stance.
Get one of your kids to explain it to you since you are too thick to do it on your own.
-
@raphjd said in AG Garland and conflict of interest:
More word games to justify your bullshit stance.
Get one of your kids to explain it to you since you are too thick to do it on your own.
Are you suggesting I use too many big words for you?
English is a foreign language to you - I get that. Either that or your Primary School teacher would be very upset with you.
Either way, Google is your friend... all those big words have special meanings... English as a language has a different word for many very similar things (thus, the need for a Thesaurus!). Then again, English also uses the same word for multiple meanings.... hence: read
- Is that "reed" or "red"?
I don't envy adults who have to learn English! Kids do it easily because their brains have so many connections... by the time you hit 25, the number of available connections are WAY DOWN! Which is why "it's hard to teach an old dog new tricks"
-
And you are still too ignorant to get what is being talked about.
-
@raphjd said in AG Garland and conflict of interest:
And you are still too ignorant to get what is being talked about.
Actually, I think I pretty much won the argument: Garland - in prosecuting people who made threats while protesting CRT - is doing his constitutionally designed job, and his son-in-law is providing CRT materials to schools (colleges and universities) who are seeking them out...
Nothing else here folks!
-
Nothing else here except for a dirty AG and a whore that pretends he's done nothing wrong.
Hello! It looks like you're interested in this conversation, but you don't have an account yet.
Getting fed up of having to scroll through the same posts each visit? When you register for an account, you'll always come back to exactly where you were before, and choose to be notified of new replies (either via email, or push notification). You'll also be able to save bookmarks and upvote posts to show your appreciation to other community members.
With your input, this post could be even better 💗
Register Login