Liberals love "whataboutisms" unless the other side does it
-
You know what I love. I love how people want to complain about Liberals and then they complain about something by telling Liberals (incorrectly BTW) what they do. Maybe try learning about Liberals from knowing Liberals. Even though I have many conservative friends and the whole rest of my family. I don't assume that makes up ALL conservatives., I sure as hell know that I don't even like to refer to the current Right Wing as conservative. Since it's this mindset that is there now. A group that keep blaming everything they dont like in the world on the fault of Liberals. I mean, What do you feel you gained by this post? I'm sure that you will have any of the people who think just like you all have to think (or else they get ya, ask Liz Cheney) Then they think because all of them are required to have to think the same ideology as Trump, that the Left is like that. Learn about a group of people rather than tell them incorrectly what they do and think. Which i am sure you saw this on a Trump group and was like "I will steal that and people will think im so politically savvy"
Your post literally does nothing but complain that every time the Dems get in Office its right after the Republican screwed things up. So no one is going "What about Trump". And no one is telling you that you cant speak negative about anyone I mean it makes more sense to complain about Trump than when Trump got in office and a couple years later we still hear people blaming Hilary for their lives. You can say what ever you want about the Democrats in your list. Since you cant really show the Republican ones did anything. We only mention Trump it seems when we are undoing the crap he did. Oh and because he's being investigated for criminal charges since hes not in office anymore. And there is that whole Capital riot thing. Thats why Trump is mentioned.
-
@bi4smooth Oh i hate the man. I didnt like him before but I hate him for the friends Ive lost to that QAnon insanity.
This person clearly cant see how they shouldnt have posted this, because it comes off incredibly ignorant of reality. Its fine though. keep em busy so that the current administration can get stuff done. -
@bi4smooth Oh please. All the media fealty Obama got was much higher. They actually called him the "First Gay President," even though it was the Supreme Court who legalized gay marriage. And he was an in your face communist agent.
-
UMM, I know you are too dumb to realize it, but 96% of Trump's coverage was negative and mostly lies.
"Sources familiar with Trump's way of thinking" and the like were quoted as proof that Trump was even.
-
LOL.
I refuse to accept the lies a liberal says because they are liars. Their actions tell the truth.
I do notice you have a single narrative. You think that if liberals don't support my stance, I should not post it.
Clearly, you have no clue exactly why Liz Cheney had to go. Maybe you should look it up.
Your silence on countless matters that I have posted about shows what your stance is.
LOL, you are such a clueless clown. No one is blaming Hillary for our lives. Hillary is proof that if you are a liberal, you can get away with anything.
Of course, you are too stupid to get any of this since you only listen to MSM.
-
@raphjd said in Liberals love "whataboutisms" unless the other side does it:
LOL.
I refuse to accept the lies a liberal says because they are liars. Their actions tell the truth.
I do notice you have a single narrative. You think that if liberals don't support my stance, I should not post it.
Clearly, you have no clue exactly why Liz Cheney had to go. Maybe you should look it up.
Your silence on countless matters that I have posted about shows what your stance is.
LOL, you are such a clueless clown. No one is blaming Hillary for our lives. Hillary is proof that if you are a liberal, you can get away with anything.
Of course, you are too stupid to get any of this since you only listen to MSM.
You are SO GOOD at telling other people WHAT they are and WHAT they believe... if you had a clue about yourself, maybe you could talk intelligently about your own ideas...
-
Umm, you keep telling me what I believe and have said, but that's ok, you're a liberal so you can do no wrong in your "mind".
You know more about what QAnon says, yet you keep trying to portray me as one of their followers. I've only ever heard of pizza-gate and I know the pizzeria in question doesn't have a basement.
You claim Tucker Carlson is a liar, but you claim you never ever watch his show. Not shockingly, you spew proven liar talking points from the scum bags like Rachel Maddow, Joy Reid, the losers at CNN, and countless others.
-
@raphjd said in Liberals love "whataboutisms" unless the other side does it:
Umm, you keep telling me what I believe and have said, but that's ok, you're a liberal so you can do no wrong in your "mind".
You know more about what QAnon says, yet you keep trying to portray me as one of their followers. I've only ever heard of pizza-gate and I know the pizzeria in question doesn't have a basement.
You claim Tucker Carlson is a liar, but you claim you never ever watch his show. Not shockingly, you spew proven liar talking points from the scum bags like Rachel Maddow, Joy Reid, the losers at CNN, and countless others.
Count them, please (I have never, knowingly, quoted Rachel Maddow - I don't HAVE cable, so I can't watch her show). I have never called Tucker Carlson a liar about a single thing I've heard him say on-air - because I don't have cable, and can't watch his show. I guess I could READ CNN online... and I don't even know why Joy Reid is.. she's a D-List newsy at best...
I've provided my international sources before... but, of course, they're all liberal to you! The WSJ is too liberal for you!
-
You have called Tucker a liar. You once said that the only thing he might get right is his own name. BUT, you never watch him.
Not having cable does not prevent anyone from watching certain shows. I live in the UK, with no cable and I can watch their shows.
Also, just because you don't watch these liberals you love so much, doesn't mean you don't know exactly what they are saying or not saying in many cases. Other "news" outlets constantly do the incestuous quoting each other as their sources. One example is when Yahoo News quoted NYT, while NYT quoted Yahoo News. Rachel Maddow, Joy Reid, and other liberals then quoted Yahoo News and NYT, to prove their articles are "truthful".
Tim Pool did a set of videos on the liberal "journalist" cabal that got exposed. They set up various websites to conspire on which narratives to push. Each time they would get outed, they would create a new site.
Of course, to people like you, Tim Pool can't be honest because he used to be quite liberal and became a conservative because of the way liberals are.
-
@bi4smooth Oh like you need cable to watch Rachel Mad-Cow. Hello, it's called the internet. Ever heard of Youtube?
-
@manhandler said in Liberals love "whataboutisms" unless the other side does it:
@bi4smooth Oh like you need cable to watch Rachel Mad-Cow. Hello, it's called the internet. Ever heard of Youtube?
YEP, I watch YouTube a lot to get "normal" broadcast and cable shows.
-
@manhandler said in Liberals love "whataboutisms" unless the other side does it:
@bi4smooth Oh like you need cable to watch Rachel Mad-Cow. Hello, it's called the internet. Ever heard of Youtube?
Yes, I know YouTube - but to watch their shows on YouTube would imply that I'm searching for that content!
I am not interested!
I no more want to watch Rachel Maddow than I want to watch Tucker Carlson.
They are not news, they are "opinion" shows... and I don't need their feeble, partisan interpretations of the news.Call me Joe Friday... "Just the facts, ma'am"...
(Reference: 1960's TV cop show called "Dragnet") -
You aren't interested, but you are interested in everything QAnon says.
You slag off Tucker and said the only thing he might be able to get right is his name, yet you never, ever watch his show. So how do you know?! Who is spoon-feeding you this info? Did you just pick a random name to call a liar? Some douchebag had to tell you this stuff. I'm guessing someone from the Squad, or maybe it's printed on Pelosi's panties.
-
@raphjd said in Liberals love "whataboutisms" unless the other side does it:
You aren't interested, but you are interested in everything QAnon says.
You slag off Tucker and said the only thing he might be able to get right is his name, yet you never, ever watch his show. So how do you know?! Who is spoon-feeding you this info? Did you just pick a random name to call a liar? Some douchebag had to tell you this stuff. I'm guessing someone from the Squad, or maybe it's printed on Pelosi's panties.
This is not the Straw Man you are looking for...
Again, you attribute things to me that are demonstrably untrue. Not being interested in Tucker Carlson's show is not equivalent to being a Liberal Democrat.
-
@bi4smooth No, it's not that you aren't interested in Tucker, it's that you are making up absolute fiction when talking about him. Let's hear you give us one example of something Tucker lied about.
-
@bi4smooth said in Liberals love "whataboutisms" unless the other side does it:
@raphjd said in Liberals love "whataboutisms" unless the other side does it:
You aren't interested, but you are interested in everything QAnon says.
You slag off Tucker and said the only thing he might be able to get right is his name, yet you never, ever watch his show. So how do you know?! Who is spoon-feeding you this info? Did you just pick a random name to call a liar? Some douchebag had to tell you this stuff. I'm guessing someone from the Squad, or maybe it's printed on Pelosi's panties.
This is not the Straw Man you are looking for...
Again, you attribute things to me that are demonstrably untrue. Not being interested in Tucker Carlson's show is not equivalent to being a Liberal Democrat.
Clearly not what I said.
You slag off Tucker and said the only thing he might be able to get right is his name, yet you never, ever watch his show. So how do you know?! Who is spoon-feeding you this info? Did you just pick a random name to call a liar? Some douchebag had to tell you this stuff. I'm guessing someone from the Squad, or maybe it's printed on Pelosi's panties.
-
@raphjd said in Liberals love "whataboutisms" unless the other side does it:
@bi4smooth said in Liberals love "whataboutisms" unless the other side does it:
@raphjd said in Liberals love "whataboutisms" unless the other side does it:
You aren't interested, but you are interested in everything QAnon says.
You slag off Tucker and said the only thing he might be able to get right is his name, yet you never, ever watch his show. So how do you know?! Who is spoon-feeding you this info? Did you just pick a random name to call a liar? Some douchebag had to tell you this stuff. I'm guessing someone from the Squad, or maybe it's printed on Pelosi's panties.
This is not the Straw Man you are looking for...
Again, you attribute things to me that are demonstrably untrue. Not being interested in Tucker Carlson's show is not equivalent to being a Liberal Democrat.
Clearly not what I said.
You slag off Tucker and said the only thing he might be able to get right is his name, yet you never, ever watch his show. So how do you know?! Who is spoon-feeding you this info? Did you just pick a random name to call a liar? Some douchebag had to tell you this stuff. I'm guessing someone from the Squad, or maybe it's printed on Pelosi's panties.
I don't give a damn about Tucker Carlson - you can sniff his panties all night long for all I care. But he continues to make false and baseless claims about the election results... and he's as partisan as they come.
Look, he lies - and so do the other partisan hacks out there - like Bill Mahr, Sean Hannity, Rachel Maddow, and the list goes on... I don't pay attention to such biased viewpoints, but that doesn't mean I'm deaf either!
The problem with many of these (and the process started with Rush) is that they make such WILDLY false and outlandish claims, that they themselves become the story. Any news commentator or reporter who makes themselves the story is no longer news and become "entertainment" - and are as "real" as WWE.
-
@bi4smooth Oh, yea. Please give an EXAMPLE of the lies he's told. I've asked you twice now.
-
UMM, Tucker shows the proof.
He has the other side on, so you get it straight from the horse's mouth.
Your side doesn't do that.
-
@raphjd said in Liberals love "whataboutisms" unless the other side does it:
UMM, Tucker shows the proof.
He has the other side on, so you get it straight from the horse's mouth.
Your side doesn't do that.
This is not the straw-man you're looking for...
You don't know anything about my sources - you keep speculating that it's some kind of liberal media, and I keep telling you I don't watch liberal OR conservative media! At least not the extremists! Indeed, a LOT of the information I get comes from INTERNATIONAL sources - so the "local politics" are somewhat removed.
Hello! It looks like you're interested in this conversation, but you don't have an account yet.
Getting fed up of having to scroll through the same posts each visit? When you register for an account, you'll always come back to exactly where you were before, and choose to be notified of new replies (either via email, or push notification). You'll also be able to save bookmarks and upvote posts to show your appreciation to other community members.
With your input, this post could be even better 💗
Register Login