A catalog of Trump’s worst cruelties, collusions, corruptions, and crimes
-
https://www.mcsweeneys.net/articles/the-complete-listing-so-far-atrocities-1-889
Early in President Trump’s term, McSweeney’s editors began to catalog the head-spinning number of misdeeds coming from his administration. We called this list a collection of Trump’s cruelties, collusions, and crimes, and it felt urgent then to track them, to ensure these horrors — happening almost daily — would not be forgotten. This election year, amid a harrowing global health, civil rights, humanitarian, and economic crisis, we know it’s never been more critical to note these horrors, to remember them, and to do all in our power to reverse them. This list will be updated between now and the November 2020 Presidential election.
-
I'm glad people are keeping track. There's just so, so much shit coming out of him.
-
You have got to be kidding. Why don't you throw in - he has orange skin. "Policy." "Sexual Misconduct." "Russia Collusion." Where's your proof pal? Oh that's right, you're just here patting yourself on the back. Pathetic.
-
No evidence of Russian collusion exists.
The closest we came to evidence was the illegally altered CIA email by an FBI lawyer who has now plead guilty.
-
Hey Bear,
A week ago you posted this slander against Orange Man, yet when challenged, you have nothing to say. What's up with that? Why post? It's like every post you make is a hit and run. You claim he committed cruelties and collusions and corruptions and crimes, but when asked to elaborate, you just vanish. Do you have any proof? At this point let it be known very clearly, that you are just vomiting out dim talking points that have no backing or factual evidence. So why do you believe that it's true if you don't have anything to show why you believe it? It's just random garbage you're throwing out like you're trying to do a fake hit piece. If you were in a court, you'd make a terrible prosecutor. I don't expect you to answer. Why bother if you aren't effective whatsoever?
-
Also, "obstruction of justice" is because he wanted the courts to settle the dispute between the Exec and the Legislature.
Every President has done this.
-
The Supreme Court, as I believe Madison or Jackson said, is the weakest branch, because it doesn't have to ability to enforce it's edicts. Ginsburg believed in legislating from he bench. But Bear… go ahead. We're all waiting on your evidence of collusion like Adam Schiff said, the evidence is in plain site. What a joke.
-
Shifty Schiff said he had in HIS possession ABSOLUTE PROOF of Russian collusion. To date, he has not provided this "evidence" despite him making this claim for nearly 4 years.
Also, the released testimony from Schift's hearing in the bunker proves that countless people on MSM lied to the US and the world about Russian collusion.
-
The Supreme Court, as I believe Madison or Jackson said, is the weakest branch, because it doesn't have to ability to enforce it's edicts. Ginsburg believed in legislating from he bench. But Bear… go ahead. We're all waiting on your evidence of collusion like Adam Schiff said, the evidence is in plain site. What a joke.
Plain site.. ::)
Hello! It looks like you're interested in this conversation, but you don't have an account yet.
Getting fed up of having to scroll through the same posts each visit? When you register for an account, you'll always come back to exactly where you were before, and choose to be notified of new replies (either via email, or push notification). You'll also be able to save bookmarks and upvote posts to show your appreciation to other community members.
With your input, this post could be even better 💗
Register Login