More childish leftism

nick75

Did I say you didn't have the right to call him names?
I meant you can't call someone names and then expect them to turn up for a debate!!
I also meant both behaviour are childish. What happened to being the bigger person!?

But raphjd, you didn't answer the question: is there a way to un-link the upvote/downvote system from the reputation feature for this section of the forum?
I think it'd be a happy medium: it's not censorious and somebody's reputation can't be abused.

raphjd

The forum software isn't very user friendly on the admin side. The stuff it built in and not a plug in.

For 3 years I've tried to get my stalker to debate, rather than hide in the shadows being a typical leftist loser. He stopped stalking me for a while but fairly recently something crawled up his vag and he started again. Eventually I changed my signature and started treating him like he deserves to be treated.

I mean, how fucking mental do you have to be to angry face a post where I condemn genocide?! He pathological.

He's also a liar. He said he was gonna stop stalking me, but less than 2 hours later he was back doing it and hasn't stopped.

raphjd

Has anyone noticed that leftists never engage in actual debate but attack me personally?

They angry face my posts condemning like genocide, Facebook wanting your banking details, etc.

Or they write a post to personally attack me for saying sweatshops and child labor is evil.

Not surprisingly, these are things they wanted others banned for. Even then they were too stupid to realize that they were violating the same rules they demand I enforce on others.

It's as if it's their version of the bike lock of peace.

Gianni89

Hypocrisy is real. It isn't always easy to look at the dark side of a story that has been thoroughly whitewashed for their consumption. From what I have seen of your stalker, if they can't put the subject to rest in one easy package, they fall back on a lot of canned diatribe - then resort to calling YOU a child when you point out the flaw in the approach. To put it simply, it takes effort to actually debate something. That party has zero interest in actual debate.

I would suggest they simply stick with threads that only require simple answers, like "The biggest dick you have ever taken". Just sayin. Although I expect if "said party" is only interested in instant gratification that may also be an issue, cuz someone has ALWAYS ridden a bigger dick, but DID they know how to use it?! :cheesy2: :cheers:

raphjd

It's not just my stalker who does it. DrWas popped in just to insult me rather than discuss anything. Many other liberals have done the same.

There are liberals here who that I respect, despite the fact that I disagree with them, because they have engaged in actual debate.

Gianni89

Haters gonna hate. It's easy to trash someone "drive by" style, but the fact they don't engage just makes them look insignificant. More importantly it's a type of hazing that seems to occur when the argument they have been trying to make winds up failing scrutiny, or they want to "come for you" but they haven't the constitution to get the job done.

raphjd

It looks like DrWas got another bug up his/her vag and had to have a play with my posts again.

Matie

The woke crowd run out of words and arguments pretty quickly, usually by now anyone who doesn't kowtow to them gets banned or doxxed or cancelled, so it is good to have a single place in the netiverse where one doesn't get eliminated for not agreeing with their fascism. But when everything is not stacked their way they shut up, take their ball and go home. This is not enough of a safespace for these pathetic, worthless snowflakes so they probably all melted away.

fantastic202

I think that being on the left is fine, as long as it isn't extremist or radical, because that's unhealthy. I'm more of a centrist, but I can see what you mean.

raphjd

Looks like my stalkers are back with bugs up their vaginas.