Apple hates white people
-
AGAIN, Apple isn't donating to the other charities. They are only facilitating the ability for others to donate through Apple Pay, the App Store, and Itunes.
Excerpt from one of the links I gave:
Apple has announced that it will be donating $1 million to aid recovery and rebuilding efforts in Southern California
???
Also this picture:
from this source I had already posted.If you want to prove me wrong, do your homework first and please READ!!!
-
I do NOT dispute that 1 charity (forest fire). I said as much in the next sentence, where I said that Sandra Bullock gave the same amount. It's a pathetic amount considering how wealthy the company is. Apple gave the same (once) as they give SPLC annually.
I dispute the rest though unless we're talking about Haiti.
-
So it boils down to you being mad because Apple doesn't give money to the charities you like or the amount of money you want them to.
Apple has never stated that they'd give X% of the benefits each year to charities.
Also, let me remind you that Apple is a for-profit company and if you think they're donating out of pure benevolence, you need to learn a few things about PR and business.So unless it's illegal, I don't understand your complaint and still don't see the racism in all of it.
You still haven't shown EVIDENCE of racism, just crazy conjectures and very common misleading* marketing tactics!misleading: not precise enough but not a lie.
-
Ok, let's try this again.
Excluding the one-off donation for the forest fire in their area, they only give to leftist hate groups like SPLC. Sandra Bullock (one of many celebs) gives more to actual charities than Apple.
They do give for hurricane relief, but they give to Haiti, not the US and other western countries.
They are completely dishonest about RED and bury the truth in the small print. This is their biggest charity and they don't even give to it. All the money comes from sales of RED products.
The PR is in the truth about the company.
-
Excluding the one-off donation for the forest fire in their area,
[…]
They do give for hurricane reliefWhen reality inconveniences you, you may as well ignore it!
they only give to leftist hate groups like SPLC.
The only conclusion you can draw from it is that they're biased.
Duh!! Of course they are.
FYI, the SPLC has called non-white people hateful or bigoted (or any other buzz words they like) such as Maajid Nawaz, Ben Carson or Ayaan Hirsi Ali (she's a heroine in my opinion!)Sandra Bullock (one of many celebs) gives more to actual charities than Apple.
I didn't know it was a competition… to know who's the purest or least mingy!?
I don't know, you tell me!I couldn't care less.They do give for hurricane relief, but they give to Haiti, not the US and other western countries.
This is my favourite sentence, I love it! You sound so much like a social justice warrior/far-leftist!
If we follow your logic that means that if you don't have a friend of each and every single ethnicity that means you're racist. If you don't date people of a certain race you're racist against that group of people.
Because we all know that everyone is entitled to love, just like every country is entitled to Apple's "benevolence". :funny2:They are completely dishonest about RED and bury the truth in the small print.
See pictures attached.
Ok, let's try this again.
You can twist words, read into vague claims and rephrase sentences all you want but it won't change the fact that you're either wrong or you don't have enough evidence (not that you've shown any) to prove your point!
Your premise is faulty and your conclusions misguided, to put it gently.
-
Are you still trying to peddle the notion that Apple HATES white people?
FFS dude… Just admit it was a shock-title from your part. -
You said that Apple was donating to the west, even though it wasn't. All they did was change their rules and start allowing donations through Apple Pay, Itunes and the App Store.
Other than giving to SPLC and other leftist groups, they gave $1 million to the local forest fire.
Other than that, they give to Haiti and Africa.
-
As you scroll down the Apple Product RED page, it's a bit odd that they only tell the truth at the very bottom.
All through the page, they promote it in a neutral non-specific way.
Why are they doing this?
Why not be honest from the very beginning of the page, in the first bit?
++++
BTW, I know that SPLC has targetted non-whites with their BS.
The point I was making is that most of their "donations" in the west are to leftist groups, with only a tiny portion actual humanitarian issues.
-
As you scroll down the Apple Product RED page, it's a bit odd that they only tell the truth at the very bottom.
All through the page, they promote it in a neutral non-specific way.
Why are they doing this?
A storm in a teacup…
Why not be honest from the very beginning of the page, in the first bit?
If you're too lazy to read to the bottom, there's no hope for you and I don't care.
Also it means that you're not donating for good reasons if you're not curious enough to find where your money is going…BTW, I know that SPLC has targetted non-whites with their BS.
I thought you'd say they're guilty by association. Very common SJW behaviour.
The point I was making is that most of their "donations" in the west are to leftist groups, with only a tiny portion actual humanitarian issues.
No, your point is that they're racist and you use their preference as "evidence".
Do you really think that every single country is entitled to Apple's money? Because in that case, it'd be logical to call Apple racist. But now you have another problem: your premise is faulty.
And I think we finally got to the core of this whole thread: You think there should be equality (of outcome) in donations. -
Are you saying that unless I blindly donate, then I'm being bad?! I never, ever donate unless I know where the money goes. I don't want my money going to groups/causes that work against me.
Their "preference" is to take money from whites and not doing anything to help whites, except that one time they were being self-serving when they donated that pittance to the forest fire in their area.
Odd that you bring up "equality of outcome" while we're talking about a leftist company like Apple. You'd think it would be their mantra. Then again, leftists hate whites as we constantly see.
Would you be still as "they're not racist" if Apple only gave to whites?
-
-
Well, they like whites enough to take our money, but that's about it.
-
They like people who have money and can fund their business. Period.
-
Are you saying that unless I blindly donate, then I'm being bad?! I never, ever donate unless I know where the money goes. I don't want my money going to groups/causes that work against me.
First, I was talking about people in general (which includes you obviously) but "unless I blindly donate, then I'm being bad?!" where did you get that from!? It's the exact opposite of what I said. You SHOULD know and care about where your money is going!
Their "preference" is to take money
from whites and not doing anything to help whites,Apple is a for-profit company.
except that one time they were being self-serving when they donated that pittance to the forest fire in their area.
Apple is a for-profit company.
I'm starting to sound like a broken record.Odd that you bring up "equality of outcome" while we're talking about a leftist company like Apple.
You're finally getting the irony of your whole argument, I'm glad I could make that clear for you.
Then again, leftists hate whites as we constantly see.
And still, you've shown no evidence of it so far…
Would you be still as "they're not racist" if Apple only gave to whites?
I still wouldn't care and definitely wouldn't call it racist. I just don't like to trivialise such a word. But obviously it's not a problem for you.
-
I know Apple is "for profit". This has nothing to do with the fact that they take from whites and only give to blacks, except the 2 leftist groups in the west.
The left would lose their minds if the situation was reversed.
-
Typical. Some whiny leftist downvoted all of my posts.
Anyway, as a leftist company, you would think Apple would support the leftist mantra of "equality of outcome" and donate equally. Then again, "equality of outcome" doesn't apply to white people.
-
Come on WAFFLEZ, grow some balls and come out from your hiding spot and have an actual discussion. Or are you such a loser that you need to follow me around downvoting and angry facing everything I post while hiding.
-
Raphjd has got to be the most hateful, bigoted and ignorant person I've ever encountered outside the American south. How he can be given a position of responsibility in this forum is beyond me - his bigotry is the number one reason I avoid the forum, and has also made me seriously consider abandoning this site. As gay people who have had to face this kind of malignancy from straight people in our everyday lives, it astounds me that any of you would want this person to be a continuing member of this site. Really, all of you who continue to tolerate him astound me almost as much as his constant attacks on other gay people. But if that's your choice, enjoy him - and I'll continue to avoid the forums that SHOULD be for all of us, not just the most prejudiced.
-
Wait, wanting equality and honesty is now "intolerant" bigotry". Typical leftist.
I haven't advocated for people being banned because of their beliefs, leftists have. So who is the real intolerant bigot?!
-
Raphjd has got to be the most hateful, bigoted and ignorant person I've ever encountered outside the American south. How he can be given a position of responsibility in this forum is beyond me - his bigotry is the number one reason I avoid the forum, and has also made me seriously consider abandoning this site.
If Raphjd is the most hateful person you've ever encountered, you don't know enough people and the bubble you live in must be really comfy!
I think his opinions are sometimes misguided and he can be quick to jump to conclusions but it's his right. If your sheltered life is threatened by somebody voicing their opinions perhaps the problem isn't with them… but no one can force you to stay if you think you can't get over him.As gay people who have had to face this kind of malignancy from straight people in our everyday lives, it astounds me that any of you would want this person to be a continuing member of this site. Really, all of you who continue to tolerate him astound me almost as much as his constant attacks on other gay people.
Oh please, burn that victim card immediately!
Has it ever occurred to you that we tolerate him because we're actually tolerant!?But if that's your choice, enjoy him - and I'll continue to avoid the forums that SHOULD be for all of us, not just the most prejudiced.
The forum is already for everybody, YOU are the one who chooses to leave! Own up to your decision instead of blaming him.
Hello! It looks like you're interested in this conversation, but you don't have an account yet.
Getting fed up of having to scroll through the same posts each visit? When you register for an account, you'll always come back to exactly where you were before, and choose to be notified of new replies (either via email, or push notification). You'll also be able to save bookmarks and upvote posts to show your appreciation to other community members.
With your input, this post could be even better 💗
Register Login