Should I post my collection of posts that give liberals nightmares?
-
This sort of post is EXACTLY why I think there shouldn't even be a political forum on this site. I think just from the title of the original post it's clear that this was intended to anger other forum members. Why would you behave so stupidly, when I might read this and decide never to upload anything here again - because why share with someone like you?
I suppose you enjoy the attention you get from picking online fights. That alone says enough about you for me to know that I don't like you, don't want to share my porn collection with you, and that any site that gives you a soapbox to stand on is probably not one I'll enjoy.
Good job. -
Why would you behave so stupidly, when I might read this and decide never to upload anything here again - because why share with someone like you?
Because that's a very petty attitude to have. I'd expect anyone old enough to be viewing the torrents on this site to be more mature than that. This place is a tracker first and a forum second (possibly third). Punishing the entire community because of one person on the forums who may never even snatch your uploads is just childish.
-
This sort of post is EXACTLY why I think there shouldn't even be a political forum on this site. I think just from the title of the original post it's clear that this was intended to anger other forum members. Why would you behave so stupidly, when I might read this and decide never to upload anything here again - because why share with someone like you?
I suppose you enjoy the attention you get from picking online fights. That alone says enough about you for me to know that I don't like you, don't want to share my porn collection with you, and that any site that gives you a soapbox to stand on is probably not one I'll enjoy.
Good job.I totally get where you're coming from- normally I would just ignore the politics and debate section- unless I know I can shrug it off and not let myself get upset because I know that both politics and religion are the minefields which can make people lose their temper.
That said, I echo the sentiment stated by some here that BOTH sides have an extreme faction which are guilty of their own selective realities, and biases which demonize their opponents.
I'm not too impressed by the OP's initial salvo against liberals, specially since both sides are guilty of actively trying to silence/shut out all dissenting voices and proitect their respective echo-chambers. And more than half his post is more about the pitfalls of the system of checks and balances on FB.
Now if I were to post a critique of say, the Republicans- I would choose something which highlights their brand of villainy using humor. It says something about how you're running things when you translate so easily to a Dungeons and Dragons campaign and come off like absolute Douchebags. So here you go OP- enjoy! http://www.slate.com/blogs/browbeat/2017/03/23/_gopdnd_uses_dungeons_dragons_to_explain_the_republican_party_s_villainy.html :laugh:
-
This sort of post is EXACTLY why I think there shouldn't even be a political forum on this site. I think just from the title of the original post it's clear that this was intended to anger other forum members. Why would you behave so stupidly, when I might read this and decide never to upload anything here again - because why share with someone like you?
I suppose you enjoy the attention you get from picking online fights. That alone says enough about you for me to know that I don't like you, don't want to share my porn collection with you, and that any site that gives you a soapbox to stand on is probably not one I'll enjoy.
Good job.The category of this forum is "POLITICAL DEBATE". If you don't like political debate, I would suggest you don't enter the portion of the forum dedicated to Political Debate.
As for your suggestion that you won't upload anything here again…. I compared my stats to yours.. and I upload an average of 70 times as much per day as you do.. hmm...
-
Why do people come to this section just to complain that this section exists?
I bet they would have no problem with this section if every post was slagging off non SJWs.
-
Why do people come to this section just to complain that this section exists?
I bet they would have no problem with this section if every post was slagging off non SJWs.
Next, there will be people complaining that there is nudity on this site, and it promotes homosexuality… HORRORS!!! :afr:
By the way.. for those like me who didn't know what SJW means.. it's a "Social Justice Warrior" aka a whining malcontent.
-
I have found that getting political often results in flame wars.. but I see that there is a political debate group here. Is there an administrator or moderator that would object to me posting things that expose how awful and vile the liberals are?
I would like to share my "proof" so that others in the group could use what I post to "spread the word". I am cautious about getting political. Last month, someone I had chatted with weekly for over 20 years unfriended me on Facebook because I criticized ultra liberal talk show host Seth Myers.
Who cares about your backwards USA bullshit? I suggest you keep it to yourself or share it during your local bible bashers meeting.
-
Who cares about your backwards USA bullshit? I suggest you keep it to yourself or share it during your local bible bashers meeting.
You are just upset because when Angela Merkel tried kissing up to Trump, he refused to shake her hand or even look at her. Trump did tell her that Germany needs to stop being a deadbeat nation and pay their share for NATO. Before Merkel became dictator 15 years ago, Germany was a major NATO ally, now look at them.
-
F*** Nato. De Gaulle in 66 opted out. best choice ever ;D
http://www.rpfrance-otan.org/Lettre-from-President-Charles-de
-
I will dig up my comments from months ago.. and have new ones. In fact, I rarely offer my OPINIONS, I stick to facts, which drives people NUTS.
facts tend to have a liberal bias.
The most recent travesty affected me personally. I commented on Democratic Representative Adam Shiff's Facebook page. I chastised him for attacking Trump constantly. I reminded him that during a CAMPAIGN it is fair to attack a CANDIDATE.. but after an election, it is a crime called SEDITION to attack the president of the United States. After the election, politics need to end, so that the process of actual governing can begin.
So, you are saying the entire eight years of the Obama administration, where the entire GOP was attacking Obama, they were guilty of sedition?
And Donald Trump himself, who for eight years attacked the legitimacy of the Obama administration by perpetuating the lie that he was not born in Hawaii is guilty as well?
In other countries, attacking the leader would get one put in prison, or even shot. Even in England which has "freedom of the press" there is an exception.. the press are forbidden from attacking the Queen (and to some degree the other Royals). To do so is a crime. It is ironic that decades ago, there were fairly credible news programs. In fact, believe it or not, CNN used to be the most credible news outlet in the world!
It still is, to people who do not read the fake news of the alt-right.
The term "fake news", by the way, means reporting completely made up propaganda, like that the Clintons are behind a child sex slave ring.
The alt-right, and Trump, misuse the term "Fake News" to mean anyone that criticizes the dictator-in-chief.
Does my comment sound reasonable?
NO, not in the least bit reasonable. You complain about mainstream news, who report the unvarnished truth, because that truth makes Trump look bad. You think the mainstream media should put truth aside and only sing the praises of Trump.
And you do that, while applauding alt-right media that attacked Obama for eight years with pure propaganda.
Talk about censorship!
Private businesses can do whatever they want.
Are you against Capitalism?
I have been banned from numerous conservative websites for simply telling the truth, and I realize it is their right to do so.How did I do for my first political post? :crazy2:
It was a typical conservative parinoid rant.
-
This sort of post is EXACTLY why I think there shouldn't even be a political forum on this site. I think just from the title of the original post it's clear that this was intended to anger other forum members. Why would you behave so stupidly, when I might read this and decide never to upload anything here again - because why share with someone like you?
I suppose you enjoy the attention you get from picking online fights. That alone says enough about you for me to know that I don't like you, don't want to share my porn collection with you, and that any site that gives you a soapbox to stand on is probably not one I'll enjoy.
Good job.The category of this forum is "POLITICAL DEBATE". If you don't like political debate, I would suggest you don't enter the portion of the forum dedicated to Political Debate.
As for your suggestion that you won't upload anything here again…. I compared my stats to yours.. and I upload an average of 70 times as much per day as you do.. hmm...
"Should I post my collection of posts that give liberals nightmares? " is not political debate - it is flaming obvious that is just pure bs trolling
may I remind you back "The category of this forum is "POLITICAL DEBATE""
all i've seen from you and at least 4 others is baiting/trolling language then freaking out at others that argue back - if you don't like the bait being taken then don't put it on your fishing line
-
"Should I post my collection of posts that give liberals nightmares? " is not political debate
You don't get to decide what is and is not political debate. If a provocative title scares you, that's no one's problem but your own.
-
"Should I post my collection of posts that give liberals nightmares? " is not political debate
You don't get to decide what is and is not political debate. If a provocative title scares you, that's no one's problem but your own.
I did not say I was scared of anything - thankyou for twisting my words - that title was not provocative it was blatant
This forum has rules
Anyway…Apologies, I must have read the forum rules wrong.
-
Are you triggered because your president is a failure? Either way we win. He gets impeached for being a traitor and colluding with Russia = win. He sticks around loses a war in Syria and North Korea and Iran and causes the economy to collapse = win.
I love being right something deplorables have never and will never experience in their life.
-
Seth Meyers isn't a liberal show. It's just anti-Trump like all good Americans.
Seth Meyers isn't a liberal show? WOW! Just what DO you consider to be liberal?
Seth Meyers is so liberal that he wears a diaper and sleeps with a pacifier in his mouth. He also enjoys Play-Doh. -
Are you triggered because your president is a failure? Either way we win. He gets impeached for being a traitor and colluding with Russia = win. He sticks around loses a war in Syria and North Korea and Iran and causes the economy to collapse = win.
I love being right something deplorables have never and will never experience in their life.
You must live in some parallel universe where everything is opposite.
Trump is doing great. He sent the world a message with that attack on Syria. The attack itself was no big deal. FYI, the Cold War with the Soviet Union ended 25 years ago.. as did communism in that region. Russia is not the enemy anymore.. but is a rival. Frankly, Russia is less of an enemy to the government in power in the USA than the liberals in the USA are! It boggles my mind that you imply that Trump is a traitor.. and yet Obama got a free pass for doing things such as bowing to the King of Saudi Arabia and secretly giving $8 billion to Arab states in his final year in office.. including a blatant payoff to Iran of several hundred million dollars.
It also bothers me that you think that losing a war and having the economy collapse is a WIN. What country do you represent? North Korea? You are sick in the head. -
I will dig up my comments from months ago.. and have new ones. In fact, I rarely offer my OPINIONS, I stick to facts, which drives people NUTS.
facts tend to have a liberal bias.
The most recent travesty affected me personally. I commented on Democratic Representative Adam Shiff's Facebook page. I chastised him for attacking Trump constantly. I reminded him that during a CAMPAIGN it is fair to attack a CANDIDATE.. but after an election, it is a crime called SEDITION to attack the president of the United States. After the election, politics need to end, so that the process of actual governing can begin.
So, you are saying the entire eight years of the Obama administration, where the entire GOP was attacking Obama, they were guilty of sedition?
And Donald Trump himself, who for eight years attacked the legitimacy of the Obama administration by perpetuating the lie that he was not born in Hawaii is guilty as well?
In other countries, attacking the leader would get one put in prison, or even shot. Even in England which has "freedom of the press" there is an exception.. the press are forbidden from attacking the Queen (and to some degree the other Royals). To do so is a crime. It is ironic that decades ago, there were fairly credible news programs. In fact, believe it or not, CNN used to be the most credible news outlet in the world!
It still is, to people who do not read the fake news of the alt-right.
The term "fake news", by the way, means reporting completely made up propaganda, like that the Clintons are behind a child sex slave ring.
The alt-right, and Trump, misuse the term "Fake News" to mean anyone that criticizes the dictator-in-chief.
Does my comment sound reasonable?
NO, not in the least bit reasonable. You complain about mainstream news, who report the unvarnished truth, because that truth makes Trump look bad. You think the mainstream media should put truth aside and only sing the praises of Trump.
And you do that, while applauding alt-right media that attacked Obama for eight years with pure propaganda.
Talk about censorship!
Private businesses can do whatever they want.
Are you against Capitalism?
I have been banned from numerous conservative websites for simply telling the truth, and I realize it is their right to do so.How did I do for my first political post? :crazy2:
It was a typical conservative parinoid rant.
You are wrong. To begin with, get a spell checker.. it's "paranoid" not "parinoid". As for that "born in Hawaii" topic. I have gone over this before, and liberals turn a blind eye to it. I will briefly re-cap it:
1. Obama did not produce any form of birth certificate until he was already in office 1.5 years - and was forced to.
2. The birth certificate had fields filled in which the checksums on the certificate indicated were not filled in.
3. One of the fields filled in at some recent time listed Obama's race as being African American. The term African American did not exist when Obama was born. That field should have said either "African" or "Black". African American is a politically correct term that was invented decades later.
4. The woman in Hawaii that certified that birth certificate mysteriously died a year later in a plane crash. She was the ONLY person on that plane that died.. the other 20 survived.
5. Regardless of the birth certificate. Obama was not raised in the USA. He never stepped foot into the USA until he was a teenager. He was raised in Indonesia by a devout muslim. Obama's name for all those years was Barry Soetoro. In fact, looking at photos of Barry and the father that adopted him leads some people to speculate that Barry is the biological son of Soetoro.All of the above are what are known as FACTS.. not opinions. Good day!
-
Are you triggered because your president is a failure? Either way we win. He gets impeached for being a traitor and colluding with Russia = win. He sticks around loses a war in Syria and North Korea and Iran and causes the economy to collapse = win.
lol. I genuinely wonder what it's like to live in your bizzaro world.
-
"Even in England which has "freedom of the press" there is an exception.. the press are forbidden from attacking the Queen (and to some degree the other Royals). To do so is a crime."
I take it from this phrase you are referring to the laws of England & Wales rather than the individual country of England? There is no separate judicial system purely for England. The United Kingdom is made up of 4 separate countries, namely England, Scotland, Wales & Northern Ireland. Scotland & N.I. have separate legal systems from England & Wales, however none of the 4 countries have any laws against the press reporting anything about the Royal family as would be patently obvious if you tried visiting UK & read any of the tabloid press. Please get your "facts" right & stop spreading fake news.
-
it is a crime called SEDITION to attack the president of the United States.
Can you point to a law or piece of legislation that backs up your statement? There have been a number of times that what you are asserting was true, but no longer.
-
The Sedition Act of 1789, made it illegal to make "false, scandalous, and malicious writing" about the President or Congress. However,
this law was allowed to expire at the end of John Adams's term as President in 1801. It, along with the other acts commonly referred to as the Alien and Sedition Acts, were one reason why Thomas Jefferson and his Democratic-Republican Party was able to beat the Federalist Party in the election of 1800. -
The Sedition Act of 1918 also outlawed criticizing the United States Government. Like the Sedition Act of 1789, it is no longer law (it was repealed in 1921)
Now there are laws relating to advocating the overthrowing of the United States Government, referred to as seditious conspiracy. Attacking and criticizing the President does not mean that the individual is arguing for the overthrowing of the US governemnt.
As far as I know, the only people that can be punished for attacking the President of the United States are members of the military. According to Article 88 of the Uniform Code of Military Justice (UMCJ),
Any commissioned officer who uses contemptuous words against the President, the Vice President, Congress, the Secretary of Defense, the Secretary of a military department, the Secretary of Transportation, or the Governor or legislature of any State, Territory, Commonwealth, or possession in which he is on duty or present shall be punished as a court-martial may direct.
Members of the armed forces that are not officers can be punished under the more broad Article 134,
Though not specifically mentioned in this chapter, all disorders and neglects to the prejudice of good order and discipline in the armed forces, all conduct of a nature to bring discredit upon the armed forces, and crimes and offenses not capital, of which persons subject to this chapter may be guilty, shall be taken cognizance of by a general, special, or summary court-martial, according to the nature and degree of the offense, and shall be punished at the discretion of that court.
You really have two problems with your argument.
-
The Supreme Court of the United States held in Brandenburg v. Ohio, that the First Amendment protects inflammatory speech unless it was "directed to inciting or producing imminent lawless action and is likely to incite or produce such action." Basically, the person has to be inciting or encourage a riot or doing something similar to shouting "Fire!" in a crowded theater. Is Representative Adam Shiff intending to start a riot or something similar? He's not, and as such, he has the ability to criticize the President because of his First Amendment right of Freedom of Speech.
-
Representative Adam Shiff (and all other federal Representatives and Senators) are protected from most legal actions while Members of Congress by the Constitution. Article I, section 6 states that Members of Congress are protected from protected from arrests, except in cases of "treason, felony and breach of the peace." Furthermore, they cannot be punished for what they say on in any speech or debate in the house of which they are a member. Although you might be able to argue that he can be arrested for speech not made on the House floor, attempting to do so would probably bring about a lot of criticism from both sides of the aisle in both houses of Congress if someone tried to do so.
-
As stated above, there is no law barring civilians (meaning individuals not currently serving in the military) from criticizing the President or any other government official (elected or not).
-
Hello! It looks like you're interested in this conversation, but you don't have an account yet.
Getting fed up of having to scroll through the same posts each visit? When you register for an account, you'll always come back to exactly where you were before, and choose to be notified of new replies (either via email, or push notification). You'll also be able to save bookmarks and upvote posts to show your appreciation to other community members.
With your input, this post could be even better 💗
Register Login