• Categories
    • Recent
    • Tags
    • Popular
    • Users
    • Groups
    • Torrents
    • Login

    Should Active Duty clips even be categorized as Military porn?

    Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved GayTorrent.ru Discussions
    8 Posts 4 Posters 104 Views 1 Watching
    Loading More Posts
    • Oldest to Newest
    • Newest to Oldest
    • Most Votes
    Reply
    • Reply as topic
    Log in to reply
    This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
    • bitmaniaB Offline
      bitmania
      last edited by

      From my observation 99% of the Dink Flamingo / Active Duty clips have no military theme whatsoever.  Its always just two naked guys sitting on a bed who talk about random things for a bit before having sex.  I think I've only seen one movie where a guy is actually wearing a uniform.  I think an integral part of the Military theme is the usage of uniforms and this series fails hard in that aspect.  It seems military in name only and no one would probably notice anything if they changed the site's name to Two Horny Guys.    I'm just getting sick of seeing these fake excuses for military porn whenever I browse that section.  And for the most part, the Military section is dominated by this fraudulent company.

      1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
      • raphjdR Offline
        raphjd Forum Administrator
        last edited by

        Actually, most are either current or recently released members of the US armed forces at the time they made their videos for Active Duty.

        1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
        • bitmaniaB Offline
          bitmania
          last edited by

          Very well.  Still doesn't really change the fact that their site is interchangeable with the hundreds of other sites out there that DON'T carry a military banner.  I still think they suck  🙂  Sure the guys may be real active duty guys, but since porn is a visual medium, they have to offer something for the audience to connect with on a more tangible level ie, the usage of uniforms.  This being said, I don't actually have a problem with the guys on the site.  They are actually very attractive.  I just really don't understand why they don't ever use uniforms in their clips.  I guess I'm the only person that really has problem with this because the clips are quite popular around here regardless.

          1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
          • L Offline
            lostalex
            last edited by

            I think they belong under military.  Personally i find them much hotter and more "military"  than the military "themed" videos that have a bunch of cracked out porn stars in bad costumes…

            When I watch military porn I want guys that are actually IN THE MILITARY,  that's what makes it hot.

            You asked why they aren't actually wearing their uniforms... I think it might actually be illegal for them to wear the uniform in porn.  The military has very strict rules about when and how uniforms are worn.

            1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
            • raphjdR Offline
              raphjd Forum Administrator
              last edited by

              YES, it is illegal to wear the uniform to make porn.  They can get prosecuted under military law (UCMJ) for it.

              1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
              • bitmaniaB Offline
                bitmania
                last edited by

                I kinda figured that, so in other military clips, they don't get prosecuted because they are not really service members, correct?  That would make a lot of sense now seeing as you've established AD has real servicemen.

                1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                • raphjdR Offline
                  raphjd Forum Administrator
                  last edited by

                  That's correct, civilians can't be prosecuted for "disgracing the uniform".

                  1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                  • T Offline
                    taboi
                    last edited by

                    @raphjd:

                    That's correct, civilians can't be prosecuted for "disgracing the uniform".

                    Unfortunately..

                    1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0

                    Hello! It looks like you're interested in this conversation, but you don't have an account yet.

                    Getting fed up of having to scroll through the same posts each visit? When you register for an account, you'll always come back to exactly where you were before, and choose to be notified of new replies (either via email, or push notification). You'll also be able to save bookmarks and upvote posts to show your appreciation to other community members.

                    With your input, this post could be even better 💗

                    Register Login
                    • 1 / 1
                    • First post
                      Last post