• Categories
    • Recent
    • Tags
    • Popular
    • Users
    • Groups
    • Torrents
    • Login

    Russia never hacked DNC. 2016 assessments were "Low Confidence" or said "Low capability", "no impact", "NO INTENT". Libs in media, Obama White House & USA IC, altered intel - as deliberate, criminal conspiracy to overthrow USA 2016 election result.

    Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved Politics & Debate
    14 Posts 2 Posters 62 Views
    Loading More Posts
    • Oldest to Newest
    • Newest to Oldest
    • Most Votes
    Reply
    • Reply as topic
    Log in to reply
    This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
    • B Offline
      blablarg18
      last edited by blablarg18

      Some liar highlights.


      1. McCain & Lindsey Graham visit Ukraine in 2016, lie that "Putin hacked into our elections" etc.

      Note, they call for 2017 to be "year we go on offense" ie. for USA to go to war with Russia........... based on their lie.

      https://x.com/mazemoore/status/1946361234489511983

      6c883cc7-9579-46ce-a61c-b15a1394cb1d-image.png


      1. Comey of FBI, 2017, lies in his sworn testimony to USA Congress.

      Russia "did it with purpose, they did it with sophistication" - lies & Comey knew he was lying.

      https://x.com/mazemoore/status/1946394610248417736

      da6ac222-c518-4949-9e3b-0070860d1bbf-image.png


      1. 2018, Kamabla pretends she saw special evidence.

      What she "saw" was either her lie made up by her, or someone else's lie.

      https://x.com/mazemoore/status/1947298350878913006

      eff19de7-c85a-4461-bd98-28a8c4820d54-image.png


      1. Did Hakim Jeffries, Dem leader, believe the lies? You judge.

      "Russia attacked our democracy, act of war, perhaps conspiracy with Trump campaign to sell out our democracy."

      https://x.com/mazemoore/status/1947425498541498864

      5325b46e-e922-4b35-9dd3-81162e57ab5a-image.png


      Countless more examples.

      It was all lies.

      raphjdR 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
      • raphjdR Offline
        raphjd Forum Administrator @blablarg18
        last edited by

        @blablarg18

        It was a conspiracy, but for different reasons.

        The DNC wanted to use it against Trump because he said China was the greatest threat, and the warhawks wanted more wars to boost the military-industrial complex.

        B 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
        • B Offline
          blablarg18 @raphjd
          last edited by blablarg18

          @raphjd yes it's weird. CCP, Cartel, billionaire & War interests across both parties, united around the lie.

          Which means............

          USA has "Uniparty" weirdly tied to CCP, Cartel, billionaire & War interests.

          1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
          • B Offline
            blablarg18
            last edited by blablarg18

            EVERY lib said "Russia hacked election" or at least repeated it.......

            .................& today pretend they didn't.

            see vids above, also this highlight reel:

            https://x.com/i/status/1947628066974359870

            "Did hack.... No doubt.... Definitively... Fact.....Why won't Trump come to terms with it?.....Definitively.....Let's be clear......Definitively.....Cyber-hacking...... Russia did cyber-hack the election...."

            06d0cbc9-9374-4a8a-9a8b-aa612cb9b640-image.png


            Just like covid.

            Libs said: Covid vaxx protect you "definitely, for sure"......they "stop the spread"...."you can know you won't get infected"....You are evil & want to kill Grandma, if you don't do it.

            Now libs pretend they never.

            1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
            • B Offline
              blablarg18
              last edited by blablarg18

              btw, 2 key claims, worth breaking up.


              1. Claim that Russia hacked USA election computers.

              USA intel agencies disproved it, rejected it.

              Yet Dems & RINOs said, again & again & again, "Russia cyber-hacked election, changing outcome" 👈 blatant deceit of USA public


              1. Claim that Russia hacked DNC emails, gave them to Wikileaks, turned people against Hillary.

              Not only FBI, but NSA too, assessed that ☝ as true-ish -with "low confidence"-.

              Where "Low confidence", means "no confidence". Because if NSA & FBI career analysts believed it, it would get higher rating.

              "Low confidence" is their code for, "Emotional people insist it be said, despite 'evidence' that, under scrutiny, looks faked, or at least unimportant."

              Also, even those "low confidence" assessment had nothing better to go on, than "Crowdstrike" analysis of DNC..... .......and Crowdstrike CEO said he had no evidence, no as in "NO", of Russia getting into DNC - except in his imagination he sure could imagine possibilities.

              as other forensics showed DNC internal leak. (disgruntled employee)

              1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
              • B Offline
                blablarg18
                last edited by blablarg18

                Summary. Russiagate was campaign of lies, ordered by 1 USA president to sabotage next.

                Did it work, USA libs? Look at 2025. Was it worth it?

                75ded23d-fd13-4351-820a-8021bac736c2-image.png


                https://x.com/DNIGabbard/status/1948007534960198036/photo/1

                3a5a7bd6-5125-4bbc-a27e-49ab6bb0b92e-image.png

                1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                • B Offline
                  blablarg18
                  last edited by blablarg18

                  Rumors that Brennan will be indicted, might reach up to Obama.

                  But we'll see.

                  Not sure if it would be lying, obstruction, fraud, treason, conspiracy (RICO) or what.

                  Some of those charges would have "statute of limitations" - except when they are tied in with other charges, that do not.

                  2020 House report:

                  The intelligence community did not have any direct information that Russian President Vladimir Putin wanted to help elect Donald Trump during the 2016 presidential election, but, at the "unusual" direction of then-President Barack Obama, published "potentially biased" or "implausible" intelligence suggesting otherwise, the House Intelligence Committee found.

                  https://www.foxnews.com/politics/brennan-directed-publication-implausible-reports-claiming-putin-preferred-trump-2016-house-found

                  refers partly to Steele Dossier. Recall:

                  • Hillary paid for Steele Dossier, roundabout thru her lawyers

                  • allies of both parties (like McCain), fed Steele Dossier into FBI & CIA

                  • analysts quickly called it bullshit

                  • CIA (Brennan) knew it was bullshit but used it anyway, when Obama ordered them to decide there was Russia interference. Like, what else did they have? (nothing)

                  • Brennan denied it was used.

                  a7b2afe5-1b9e-4c81-ba85-0d16a2dfd5e3-Gwi1_vFWQAAItWQ.jpg

                  https://x.com/DNIGabbard/status/1948007541532745789/photo/1

                  2 senior CIA officers warned Brennan that "we don’t have direct information that Putin wanted to get Trump elected”

                  Brennan "Yes, but doesn't it ring true?"

                  2020 House report, newly declassified, found they acted improperly.

                  https://x.com/greg_price11/status/1948001174210355504/photo/1

                  ea74c3a9-1787-4071-ab5c-dccbeb0a5c20-GwiwvmkXEAII1m_.jpg


                  Full 2020 House report:

                  https://www.odni.gov/files/ODNI/documents/DIG/DIG-Declassified-HPSCI-Report-Manufactured-Russia-Hoax-July2025.pdf

                  House report keeps to story line that Russia hacked DNC emails - despite NSA & FBI assessments, again, which called it "low confidence".

                  But even so, House report says

                  • Putin viewed Hillary as inevitable

                  • Viewing her as inevitable, Putin had -NO- preference for Trump. Mentality of "why do I gaf?"

                  • What Putin wanted, was only 1. future kompromat to hold over Hillary silently....... or maybe 2. stoke USA internal tensions

                  • for CIA/Brennan to say Putin wanted Trump was evidence-free & wrong

                  1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                  • B Offline
                    blablarg18
                    last edited by blablarg18

                    Brennan did perjury in 2023 when he denied CIA had used Steele Dossier for anything.

                    https://x.com/greg_price11/status/1948045315757551791

                    Mr. Brennan: No I was not involved in analyzing the dossier at all. The first time I actually saw it, was after the election. And the CIA was not involved at all.

                    9a0fb7f0-ae01-4319-9a90-dd93d7f9c965-image.png

                    1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                    • B blablarg18 referenced this topic on
                    • B Offline
                      blablarg18
                      last edited by blablarg18

                      They NEVER had evidence, Russia was DNC hacker.

                      USA House Intelligence committee, https://intelligence.house.gov/uploadedfiles/shawn_henry_testimony_dec_5_2017.pdf

                      They had CIRCUMSTANCE, that downstream, eventually, Russia got DNC emails from.............somewhere.

                      I promise you, if Russia got DNC emails, so did China - Israel - UK - maybe Ukraine, Iran, North Korea, WaPo & NYT.

                      MR HENRY. We did not have concrete evidence that data was exfiltrated from the DNC.

                      MR STEWART OF UTAH. What about the emails that everyone is so, you know, knowledgeable of?

                      MR HENRY. There's not evidence that they were actually exfiltrated.

                      MR HENRY. But let me also state that if somebody was monitoring an email server [ed: China, Israel, UK, Ukraine, Iran, North Korea] , they could read all the email. And there might not be evidence of it being exfiltrated.

                      MR HENRY. We didn't watch it happen. There's not a network sensor that actually saw traffic actually leaving.

                      56ea7c12-4206-417d-88db-35513a567055-image.png

                      cd5cfca3-1aa0-460b-b410-a5faa032857d-image.png

                      009bcb3b-057d-4753-94bd-b04ef07bc2a7-image.png

                      1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                      • B Offline
                        blablarg18
                        last edited by blablarg18

                        1. Brennan & Clapper do new acts of fraud for their conspiracy..

                        https://www.nytimes.com/2025/07/30/opinion/trump-obama-treason-russia-miller.html

                        https://x.com/seanmdav/status/1950690891967906104

                        Brennan & Clapper just re-asserted things already exposed, as lies they had made in their anti-USA conspiracy.

                        Example: they re-state that their 2016-17 assessments didn't use Steele Dossier - a proven lie, see posts earlier.


                        1. Clapper in 2016-17 was so determined to fake intel, he had crony over at CIA threaten CIA whistleblower.

                        https://thefederalist.com/2025/07/30/exclusive-clapper-crew-threatened-whistleblower-who-refused-to-sign-off-on-fabricated-intel-assessment/

                        A crony of then-Director of National Intelligence (DNI) James Clapper threatened to withhold a promotion from a senior intelligence official unless he concurred in the fake Intelligence Community Assessment (ICA) on Russia’s meddling in the 2016 election

                        in early January [analyst's Clapper-loving] supervisor told him, “There is reporting you are not allowed to see,” adding that “if you saw it, you would agree” with the ICA.

                        Narrator: But such reporting didn't exist or, if it existed in some form, it was evidence-free.

                        the analyst explained that he “would need to review any reporting myself in order to consider it.”

                        “You need to TRUST ME on this,” Clapper’s crony countered, stating to the analyst he “would need to demonstrate [his] ability to ‘outgrow’” his refusal to sign off on assessments he did not share, in order to be recommended for a promotion. The analyst remained firm, according to the notes, which led his exasperated superior to reply, “I need you to say you agree with these judgements, so that DIA will go along with them!”

                        1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                        • B Offline
                          blablarg18
                          last edited by blablarg18

                          1 official who was there says, point was, "delay or block the inauguration of Donald J. Trump" in 2016-17. 👈 treason

                          video - https://x.com/i/status/1950546170855440761

                          2ca17137-b700-417f-8387-ff4e4f574eac-image.png

                          Col. John Mills, 2015(Obama)-2018 Director for Cybersecurity Policy, Strategy, and International Affairs in the Office of the Secretary of Defense.

                          "Two days after the election in 2016, I was called up on the NSA phone. The person said I had to be on the intelligence community assessment (ICA) that was assembling to finalize the Russia narrative. because we were going to prove that Trump was a Russian asset, and we were going to delay or block the inauguration of Donald J. Trump for the first term."

                          "I just couldn't believe it. This is what I was told on the phone."

                          "So, this was a deep state coup from the beginning that actually started in early 2016. We went through the process in November, December."

                          "The final product came out in the first few days of January, 2017. But bottom line - [in] the supposed Top Secret Review, there was nothing there to show that Russia was trying to manipulate [anything, or] that the Trump campaign was somehow colluding with Russia. There was no evidence of anything."

                          'When the ICA came back to the DoD...my recommendation was non-concur. There was no evidence....[but Mills non-concur was ignored, because] Comey [FBI] and Brennan [CIA] were personally writing the assessment."

                          btw, key FBI input for Comey was Charles McGonigal, who Biden in 2023 imprisoned for....... wait for it...... McGonigal colluded with Russia oligarch tied to Putin, Oleg Deripaska, & took Russia bribe money.

                          Did McGonigal want to cover for himself? Become known, falsely, as anti-Russia, so his crimes would be laughed away?

                          1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                          • B blablarg18 referenced this topic on

                          Hello! It looks like you're interested in this conversation, but you don't have an account yet.

                          Getting fed up of having to scroll through the same posts each visit? When you register for an account, you'll always come back to exactly where you were before, and choose to be notified of new replies (either via email, or push notification). You'll also be able to save bookmarks and upvote posts to show your appreciation to other community members.

                          With your input, this post could be even better 💗

                          Register Login
                          • 1 / 1
                          • First post
                            Last post