• Categories
    • Recent
    • Tags
    • Popular
    • Users
    • Groups
    • Torrents
    • Login

    Zuck, tail between legs, pledges to stop "fact checkers", adopt Community Notes feature of X / Elon

    Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved Politics & Debate
    9 Posts 3 Posters 18 Views
    Loading More Posts
    • Oldest to Newest
    • Newest to Oldest
    • Most Votes
    Reply
    • Reply as topic
    Log in to reply
    This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
    • B Offline
      blablarg18
      last edited by blablarg18

      Elections have consequences 🤣

      video - https://x.com/i/status/1876612227807236310

      "But the fact checkers have just been too politically biased"

      f824abb6-14b6-4590-9c90-937d769e4bde-image.png

      L 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
      • L Offline
        lololulu19 @blablarg18
        last edited by

        @blablarg18 coming from one of the most biased fact checkers themselves... Mark Fuckerberger.

        1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
        • B Offline
          blablarg18
          last edited by

          classic 🤣 - and real

          https://www.nytimes.com/2025/01/07/business/mark-zuckerberg-meta-fact-check.html

          1a740fec-7d72-4430-b4ae-0491929edbe8-image.png

          1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
          • V Offline
            vmalar
            last edited by

            Brave take Mark! Thanks!

            1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
            • B Offline
              blablarg18
              last edited by blablarg18

              12 times Facebook shut down hilarious satire...because "fact check" 🤣

              https://x.com/TheBabylonBee/status/1876784199706763675


              "Fact-checking groups...said they had no role in deciding what Meta did with their fact checks."

              Sure 🙄 Let's try:

              "Drug dealers said they had no role in deciding what children did with their drugs."

              "Nazi camp guards said they had no role in deciding what prisoners did with security & monitoring they provided."

              1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
              • B Offline
                blablarg18
                last edited by blablarg18

                "Trump effect", and never forget, Zuck is sleaze.

                735345a5-93c3-4293-840e-d6f5bf66b0d2-image.png

                L 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                • L Offline
                  lololulu19 @blablarg18
                  last edited by

                  @blablarg18 What we NEED is fact checking! ACCURATE fact checking.

                  What they did with Trump is similar to this:
                  Trump would say something like "There were 142,227 people affected by the wildfires" Then the "fact-checkers" would post "Trump is a LIAR! there were not 142,227 people affected!" which is very misleading because there were 142,226 people affected.. off by one. They held Trump to a 100% accuracy threshold.

                  Meanwhile, the "fact-checkers" completely ignored that Biden was quite senile, and did just about everything wrong - and tried to cover up his mistakes with taxpayer $$$ and more debt.

                  B 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                  • B Offline
                    blablarg18 @lololulu19
                    last edited by blablarg18

                    @lololulu19 "ACCURATE fact checking" - NO - there is no such thing.

                    All "fact-checkers" 🙄 are self-appointed................ that is: automatically self-interested. automatically pompous. automatically deluded.

                    SO self-interested, pompous & deluded..that.... they are type of person who would appoint themself "fact checker"

                    Fuck that 🤣

                    Facts are facts.......and only melee or free argument can arrive at them.

                    1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                    • B Offline
                      blablarg18
                      last edited by blablarg18

                      Snopes CEO: Government bullied "fact checkers" too, not only Zuck.

                      https://www.msn.com/en-us/politics/government/snopes-ceo-say-government-not-fact-checkers-to-blame-for-censoring-hunter-biden-story-who-told-zuckerberg-to-limit-the-reach/ar-BB1rhXFf

                      In short, Chris Richmond is with Zuck.

                      No doubt, USA-Biden-Kamabla Regime was behind everything.

                      But these other people, like Richmond & Zuck, had obligation to say, FUCK OFF.

                      They failed.

                      Now they say, Oh what bullies we faced! How can we be to blame?

                      1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0

                      Hello! It looks like you're interested in this conversation, but you don't have an account yet.

                      Getting fed up of having to scroll through the same posts each visit? When you register for an account, you'll always come back to exactly where you were before, and choose to be notified of new replies (either via email, or push notification). You'll also be able to save bookmarks and upvote posts to show your appreciation to other community members.

                      With your input, this post could be even better 💗

                      Register Login
                      • 1 / 1
                      • First post
                        Last post