• Categories
    • Recent
    • Tags
    • Popular
    • Users
    • Groups
    • Torrents
    • Login

    Chill out.....

    Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved Politics & Debate
    35 Posts 4 Posters 75 Views
    Loading More Posts
    • Oldest to Newest
    • Newest to Oldest
    • Most Votes
    Reply
    • Reply as topic
    Log in to reply
    This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
    • L Offline
      lololulu19 @blablarg18
      last edited by

      @blablarg18 I forgot about that! Yes, Carroll herself stated that she had rape fantasies!

      B 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
      • J Offline
        jaroonn @blablarg18
        last edited by

        @blablarg18 said in Chill out.....:

        Reportedly, Vice Blow Job Kamala only got her career by suck cocks of Willie Brown, Montel Williams & Terence Hallinan.
        In pre-Biden career, she accomplished truly nothing - except she jailed some people who didn't deserve it & failed to jail others who did.

        You forgot the DEI hire? Please keep pushing this typical misogynistic line. It will get her elected for sure.

        1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
        • B Offline
          blablarg18 @lololulu19
          last edited by blablarg18

          @lololulu19 AND political animus.

          Only kook-Manhattan civil jury, could give her time of day.

          & only kooked-up lib could think such result, where even lib jury said "NO" on forms, means convicted

          Here we are tho 🤣

          @jaroonn "keep pushing" - Sure, here it is again.

          Reportedly, Vice Blow Job Kamala only got her career by suck cocks of Willie Brown, Montel Williams & Terence Hallinan.
          In pre-Biden career, she accomplished truly nothing - except she jailed some people who didn't deserve it & failed to jail others who did.

          When she meets Xi, Zelensky, any hetero male - they glance & think "Was she good?"

          & you want people to vote for it 🙄 Which makes you the misogynist.

          My comments are only anti-Harris. You're the one taking it to anti-woman.

          J 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
          • raphjdR Offline
            raphjd Forum Administrator @jaroonn
            last edited by

            @jaroonn

            In a civil suit, the burden of proof is 50.01%.

            The jury didn't find that he put his dick in her, as she claimed.

            Somehow the judge found that, despite the jury's verdict that he didn't rape her, her claim that he raped her was "substantially true".

            Even if it were someone else (not Trump), I'd have a hard time believing her because of her decades of comments about how good rape and other sexual abuse is.

            J 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
            • J Offline
              jaroonn @blablarg18
              last edited by

              @blablarg18 said in Chill out.....:

              When she meets Xi, Zelensky, any hetero male - they glance & think "Was she good?"

              Nothing misogynistic about that 😉 You are definitely wanting in the self-award dept. lol

              1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
              • J Offline
                jaroonn @raphjd
                last edited by

                @raphjd said in Chill out.....:

                In a civil suit, the burden of proof is 50.01%.
                The jury didn't find that he put his dick in her, as she claimed.
                Somehow the judge found that, despite the jury's verdict that he didn't rape her, her claim that he raped her was "substantially true".

                And yet this is a discussion we are having about someone who wants to be POTUS. You don't find that strange? Remember when the minimum requirement for that position was a clean criminal record? I remember when John Edwards had to drop out because he cheated on his wife. But here we are discussing which crimes of the candidate are "not so bad." It's absurd.

                raphjdR 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                • raphjdR Offline
                  raphjd Forum Administrator @jaroonn
                  last edited by

                  @jaroonn

                  Don't you find it strange that Clinton and Biden have never had their days in court?

                  It's comical how you liberals always ignore the sins of your side.

                  J 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                  • J Offline
                    jaroonn @raphjd
                    last edited by

                    @raphjd Not when these "sins" are not mere accusations that can be proved and charged. You didn't hear any Democrats supporting Sen. Menendez when he as found guilty. It was Democrats that forced Sen. Franken to resign, even without evidence.

                    As for Clinton and Biden....where's the evidence?

                    raphjdR 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                    • raphjdR Offline
                      raphjd Forum Administrator @jaroonn
                      last edited by

                      @jaroonn

                      Let them have their day in civil court with the 50.01% burden of proof.

                      J 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                      • J Offline
                        jaroonn @raphjd
                        last edited by

                        @raphjd Gather the evidence, present it to a Grand Jury........

                        You know the steps.

                        L 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                        • L Offline
                          lololulu19 @jaroonn
                          last edited by

                          @jaroonn They can't put Biden on trial because he was found to be too senile.

                          Hillary Clinton got out of going to trial because she and all of her co-conspirators were granted immunity before they were even charged.

                          J 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                          • J Offline
                            jaroonn @lololulu19
                            last edited by

                            @lololulu19 said in Chill out.....:

                            They can't put Biden on trial because he was found to be too senile.
                            Hillary Clinton got out of going to trial because she and all of her co-conspirators were granted immunity before they were even charged.

                            Would you like to try that again?

                            B L 2 Replies Last reply Reply Quote 0
                            • B Offline
                              blablarg18 @jaroonn
                              last edited by blablarg18

                              @jaroonn OK, here - They can't put Biden on trial because he was found to be too senile.

                              Hillary Clinton got out of going to trial because she and all of her co-conspirators were granted immunity before they were even charged.

                              J 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                              • L Offline
                                lololulu19 @jaroonn
                                last edited by

                                @jaroonn Sure Jaroon:

                                They can't put Biden on trial because he was found to be too senile.

                                Hillary Clinton got out of going to trial because she and all of her co-conspirators were granted immunity before they were even charged.

                                1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                                • J Offline
                                  jaroonn @blablarg18
                                  last edited by

                                  @blablarg18 said in Chill out.....:

                                  Hillary Clinton got out of going to trial because she and all of her co-conspirators were granted immunity before they were even charged.

                                  https://abcnews.go.com/Politics/donald-trump-suggests-hillary-clinton-received-fbi-immunity/story?id=42457118

                                  Associates of Clinton were granted immunity in and investigation of her (standard legal practice). Why would Hillary be granted immunity when she was the focus of the investigation? You need to stop listening to Trump. He's making you believe bullshit is real.

                                  raphjdR 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                                  • raphjdR Offline
                                    raphjd Forum Administrator @jaroonn
                                    last edited by

                                    @jaroonn

                                    Strok (you should know who he is) granted her immunity by saying she didn't intend to commit a crime, mens rea, when she violated the Congressional subpoena (destroying 33,000+ emails) and the illegal email server.

                                    J B 2 Replies Last reply Reply Quote 0
                                    • J Offline
                                      jaroonn @raphjd
                                      last edited by

                                      @raphjd said in Chill out.....:

                                      Strok (you should know who he is) granted her immunity

                                      Sorry, I don't know who that is and can't find any reference to him online. Is that the correct spelling?

                                      raphjdR 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                                      • raphjdR Offline
                                        raphjd Forum Administrator @jaroonn
                                        last edited by

                                        @jaroonn

                                        Sorry, Peter Strzok.

                                        He was one of the top FBI guys. He was fired.

                                        He was banging Lisa Page, a top FBI lawyer.

                                        He infamously told Paige that he had an insurance plan to keep Trump from winning, as well as many other things.

                                        J 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                                        • J Offline
                                          jaroonn @raphjd
                                          last edited by

                                          @raphjd said in Chill out.....:

                                          Strzok

                                          I admit I don't know much about the case; I wasn't following it at the time. I've just read this:

                                          https://www.foxnews.com/politics/doj-reached-agreement-with-clinton-lawyers-to-block-fbi-access-to-clinton-foundation-emails-strzok-says

                                          There is no mention of her being granted "immunity," but rather an agreement not to access her emails related to the Clinton Foundation.

                                          I don't really have an opinion on this; as I said, I wasn't following it.

                                          raphjdR 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                                          • raphjdR Offline
                                            raphjd Forum Administrator @jaroonn
                                            last edited by

                                            @jaroonn

                                            It wasn't immunity per se, but rather by claiming that she didn't have men's rea (criminal intent) that effectively gave her immunity. If you watched the Congressional hearings, that was the reason she was not prosecuted.

                                            Strangely, criminal intent isn't required to prosecute her for the illegal email server and violating the Congressional subpoena. Smashing hard drives under subpoena with hammers and trying to smuggle others out of the country screams criminal intent. But anyway.

                                            J 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0

                                            Hello! It looks like you're interested in this conversation, but you don't have an account yet.

                                            Getting fed up of having to scroll through the same posts each visit? When you register for an account, you'll always come back to exactly where you were before, and choose to be notified of new replies (either via email, or push notification). You'll also be able to save bookmarks and upvote posts to show your appreciation to other community members.

                                            With your input, this post could be even better 💗

                                            Register Login
                                            • 1
                                            • 2
                                            • 2 / 2
                                            • First post
                                              Last post