Secrets, Lies and Payoffs Laid Bare in Week 1 of Trump Trial Testimony

[raphjd]

@blablarg18

You keep forgetting that it's only bad when a conservative does it.

Liberals can wear blackface and be defended. Joy Behar, Ted Danson, Justin Trudeau (several times), and countless others. Have a conservative ask why wearing blackface is bad and the world turns into a shitstorm.

Paying hush money to some whore you banged is bad if you are Trump, but paying hush money to your rape victims is fine if you are a liberal.

If liberals didn't have double standards, they'd have no standards at all.

[jaroonn]

@raphjd
Wearing blackface: not illegal
Paying hush money: not illegal
"Creative" accounting: illegal

Any other questions?

[raphjd]

@jaroonn

I didn't say wearing blackface is illegal.

What I did say is that you people have double standards when it comes to it.

Liberals wear blackface and you people defend them.

A conservative asks why it's wrong, citing liberals who have done it and protected by fellow liberals, and you people lose your fucking tiny minds.

I'm sure Biden, Clinton, and the rest used creative accounting to hide the hush money to their rape victims. Of course, you people don't care because Orange Man Bad.

AGAIN, for the weak-minded liberals.

IF LIBERALS DIDN'T HAVE DOUBLE STANDARDS, THEY'D HAVE NO STANDARDS AT ALL.

[blablarg18]

@raphjd said in Secrets, Lies and Payoffs Laid Bare in Week 1 of Trump Trial Testimony:

I'm sure Biden, Clinton, and the rest used creative accounting to hide the hush money to their rape victims

Indeed if you list it openly as "Hush money for Joe's rape victim Tara"......

....or openly as "Hush money for Bill's rape victims Juanita, Paula, Leslie & Kathleen whom I Hillary savage in public"....

.... or openly as "Extortion money paid to Stormy & Michael so they won't frame me Donald with fake story of their own affair".........

It defeats entire point.

Real crime: 600,000 Ukrainians killed. So Biden can stay covered up. That's election interference.

[jaroonn]

@raphjd said in Secrets, Lies and Payoffs Laid Bare in Week 1 of Trump Trial Testimony:

Liberals wear blackface and you people defend them.

Really? I thought we were all about cancel culture? But you are right about right-wingers being too stupid to know why it's wrong.

Anyway, this post is about Trump's legal woes. What are you hoping to achieve by your reflection? Not all of us watch Fox. lol

[raphjd]

@jaroonn

You are only about cancel culture when conservatives do it.

You losers don't cancel your own unless they go against the liberal dogma.

You bitches turn a blind eye when your own rape women, but get screechy when Orange Man didn't rape someone. Before you open your clapper, remember what the jury said.

[jaroonn]

@raphjd The judge ruled that the rape allegation was "substantially true" but couldn't be proven, so the jury settled for sexual assault. That should be Trump's campaign slogan: "It was only sexual assault....not rape!" Along with his being legally barred from ever operating a charity or a university again because of fraud, he is a real role model for generations to come...lol.

And as you are such a fan of anecdotal evidence, remember what happened to John Edwards and Al Franken? Liberals gave them the boot because, unlike Republicans, we do have standards. That's why I think so many Evangelical Christians are so attracted to the GOP; it's the perfect fit for hypocrites.

[raphjd]

@jaroonn

LOL, before you bitch about Trump, you need to look deeply into your beloved DNC.

[jaroonn]

@raphjd Since you are unable to prove anything I said was wrong, I guess that means you concede.

Thanks for playing

[blablarg18]

Nope! Only in your TDS world. Here is what really happened:

Since you are a simpleton, I'll spell it out for you.

• NY lib JURY looked at rape allegation

• and found it way lacking

• JURY said NO - see above - NO

That's what happened.

The rest they cooked up after saying, Oh he must be guilty of something - since we all have TDS like @jaroonn

I know you're allergic to facts - but really, try better.

[raphjd]

@jaroonn

Maybe you should look at your "victim" and her motives.

I wouldn't stick Biden's dick in her.

BTW, when are you going to look at your own party?! Yeah, that's what I thought and said.

[jaroonn]

@raphjd said in Secrets, Lies and Payoffs Laid Bare in Week 1 of Trump Trial Testimony:

Maybe you should look at your "victim" and her motives.
I wouldn't stick Biden's dick in her.

That's your come back? Misogynism. Expected.

[raphjd]

@jaroonn

Wait, it's misogyny to call a woman ugly? You truly are a simp.

Now stop the SEXISM OF LOW EXPECATIONS and demand that your girlfriends get out there and fight for their country.

And get out on their front lines and die for your beloved actual nazis.

Yeah, that's exactly what I thought.

[jaroonn]

@raphjd You didn't call her ugly. You implied she was unrapable. You inability to see the misogyny in that explains everthing.

So I guess this means you are enlisting in the Israeli Army, so you can kill all the devil Muslims?

That's what I thought.....

[raphjd]

@jaroonn

Your inability to see your MISOGYNY OF LOW EXPECTATIONS is glaring.

Clearly, you are a femi-simp who promotes pussy privilege, while crying that their country is being invaded. Tell those bitches to grab a gun and defend their fucking country of nazis. Unless, that is, you "secretly" support Putin/Russia and hope they win.

It's not my war, but I support Israel over those who voted a terrorist org as their ruling party, then cheered on 7 Oct.

[jaroonn]

@raphjd Your logical gymnastics is mind-blowing. No wonder you always think you are right.

[raphjd]

@jaroonn

LOL, ok.

I guess English professors don't need to have coherent logic, which explains your bullshit.

[jaroonn]

@raphjd And I guess you are an example of why the Tories have been such a success

[raphjd]

@jaroonn

You clearly have no idea about UK politics.

UK politics is to the left of US politics.

Just like in the US, the UK Tories have fake conservatives. I guess we could call them TINOs.

Also, you do realize that a lot of stuff is devolved, like in Scotland which is run by the SNP, at least for a little bit longer (see current issues).

The Tories came in after the 2007/08 global economic meltdown and they had to deal with covid. Not to mention the flood of illegals.

Labour (UK version of Democrats) were in charge in 2007/08. Rather than keeping people in work and paying taxes, they let businesses go under and people lose their jobs and on welfare. As an English professor, you probably don't know that when everyone is out of work and on welfare, taxes are not pouring in. Labour kept spending but not on getting people back to work.

You should look into the disaster of Labour's "Public-Private Initiative" where the taxpayers paid for buildings to be built, then the government gives the buildings to private corporations, and then the government rents them back.

The city of Brighton did that with their garbage collection. After the contracts were signed, the corp demanded more money, when they were told the contract was the contract, the corp took everything and went back to France. That happened when I lived there.

Maybe you should look into "council housing for life" and how the Tories tried to fix the problem, while LibDems tried to prevent them from fixing it, and how the SNP kept it in Scotland.

You think you know what is going on, but you don't. You only have your hatred of conservatives.

[jaroonn]

@raphjd said in Secrets, Lies and Payoffs Laid Bare in Week 1 of Trump Trial Testimony:

You only have your hatred of conservatives.

And this is exactly what I've been talking about. You can be intelligent and make valid points. You do know that there are no absolute demons or angels. You get upset when I make sweeping generalizations about conservatives (which I don't believe btw; most of the time I'm just playing Devil's advocate). BUT you have no problem making sweeping judgements about liberals. Not even judgements: Pieces of Shit, is what I recall. You are very good at making excuses for conservatives (only some are homophobic), but we are unable to look at Ukraine objectively because of some Nazis or Palestine objectively because of Hamas. If I agree that children should be allowed to ask questions about sexuality, I am a groomer, a pedo, a child pornographer.

You said that liberals were afraid to post here out of fear you might ban them. No. It's because every conversation devolves into shite.

I am a 65-year-old professional, and I, and most of the other POS (in your words) liberal posters here are obviously intelligent and well-educated. I can play the game here of playground name calling because it is actually amusing at times and reaffirms my belief that most far-right causes are indefensible. It doesn't bother me a bit when I am told to go watch Nazi porn or fuck kiddies because I know why people have to resort to those kinds of attacks.

But please. Do a bit of reflection before you accuse anyone of anything.