"Why Martin Luther King Was Republican"
-
You really are a fucking liar.
I never said anything about how bad the law was. I pointed out how bad you liberals said the law is and how racist Democrats were in promoting the law.
If you refuse to be honest, you might need a vacation.
You prove everything I say about liberals is true.
-
@raphjd You are right. Thirty years ago the Democrats were getting in wrong. The Republicans were worse. The difference is the Democrats have progressed while the Republicans have regressed. You can't ignore the reality....just look what's going on, mate.
-
The Democrats have not changed.
You may not call blacks the N-word, but you (generic) still think of them as uncivilized, unsocialized, uneducated, unwashed, unclean, jungle animals and all the other things you guys said about them.
The only difference is now you let them get away switch everything because you are guilty of the racism of low expectations.
Black people can't do anything wrong is the liberal dogma.
Kidnap a mentally disabled 19yo white dude and torture him for nearly 36 hours white shouting racist shit at him, ain't a hate crime because 6 blacks did it. If the races were reversed, liberals would be out for blood and they'd attack every white person they saw because all whites are guilty.
It's ok to fake a hate crime, as we keep seeing. Hell, it makes a lot of money and destroys white lives, both of which liberals love.
It's ok to call black people racist names if they dare not pick the DNC cotton.
It's ok to gaslight us the Antifa doesn't exist, because you think we'll eventually believe us.
NO, the DNC hasn't changed, not really. It's only new coat of paint, but it's still the same old shitty rustbucket underneath.
-
@jaroonn Dems have not "progressed".
Since USA founding Dems been party of racists - and still are.
Party of idiots with "race on the brain".
Dems went from thinking "Let's enslave blacks with chains & whips, & profit off them," to "Let's enslave blacks with pandering & lies, & profit off them."
OK I guess that is better, a little progress. But Dems were forced by the rest of the world.
Lincoln, Civil War, GOP Abolitionists, earlier Britain abolishing slavery - Dems had to be forced.
Later MLK spoke out for a color-blind society - and now, in 2023, Dems say no no, reject it, that was only White Supremacy sneaking into MLK.
Party for racist morons. Always been, always will be.
USA Pres Lyndon Johnson, the Dem who pandered & lied & got blacks to switch parties, was one of the ugliest biggest N-word users.
-
@raphjd You really need to travel and meet new people.
-
@blablarg18 Your grasp of history is indicative of why many Americans are considered ignoramuses. A little knowledge is a dangerous thing; especially in the hands of someone with zero critical thinking skills.
-
Why, so I can meet more of the same?
BTW, I have traveled all over the US and the world. Liberals are virtually the same, no matter where you go.
-
@raphjd Ok. It's too bad you see the world and other people in that way. I can't imagine what it's like being so negative and hateful. But if it works for you.
-
AH, so you think I should close my eyes and pretend?
You guys do nothing but spew hate at us, but want us to not view you in a bad light.
You guys criminalized reality. Telling a dude that it's not "breast feeding" for a baby to suck on his tits is a crime, or have you missed that thread?
You guys redefine words to suit your agenda.
You guys whined about Jim Crow, which you guys did, then you bring it back.
You make anti-white policies and try to pass anti-white laws.
I know you were outraged when Dylan Roof shot up that black church, but were you equally outraged when Emanuel Samson shot up the white church? I bet not.
-
@jaroonn Brave face but we both know I show critical thinking & you don't, otherwise you would not be feeling so stung.
(Personal remarks - my post hadn't made any about you; your reply went there first & now here we are.)
-
@blablarg18 I apologize if you felt I was personally attacking you. I wasn't. That said, I do believe that you show no critical thinking skills whatsoever when you "support" your agenda with cherry-picked anecdotes, many of which are fatuous and most of which are hyperbolic, and emotionally-charged approaching the ludicrous. You seem also to be unable to understand that time is linear. You definitely would not me to be on your thesis committee.
-
@raphjd How you decide to see the world is your business. I just find it interesting as I've been working and living internationally most of my life, and in my experience the more educated and well-travelled a person is, the more progressive, tolerant and open-minded they are. You seem to be an anomaly. You are so certain that you can pigeon-hole people (erroneously by the way in my case), that I can't see how you can think that will lead you to factual judgement calls. But like I said, whatever gets you through the night. It doesn't matter anyway. These conversations we are having in this wee corner of cyberspace are not solving anything. They are a complete waste of time.
-
LOL, you people make me laugh.
I point to specific things that you people do, but I'm the bad guy.
-
@jaroonn Pathetic. Typical lib gaslighting & malice. Just pathetic.
It's no skin off my nose. I'm laughing.
You BLATANTLY attacked me on the "you" or "your" level (& again, were first to do so - I hadn't yet, and might never have).
Then you say in essence or in so many words, "I'm sorry you noticed & I would hurt you if I could, for example if I were on your thesis committee" proving you're not sorry. Invalidating your own fake-non-apology.
-
@raphjd said in (/post/309517):
I never said anything about how bad the law was. I pointed out how bad you liberals said the law is
LoL, isn't that just the same thing? ..."pointing out" liberal talking points, and "highlighting" bidens involvement in them?
And why would you be "pointing out" liberal talking points? Why would you waste your time repeating liberal media news? There's got to be a reason in there somewhere. Do tell
-
You people said how racist the law is.
Clearly, Democrats promoted the law in the most racist way possible.
You worship the racist Democrats.
Trump got rid a large chunks of the racist law that you people hated and you get butt hurt at Trump.
It shows how fucked in the head you people are.
It's blatantly obvious, from liberals' won mouths that you guys are racists.
-
@raphjd said in [/post/309577):
Clearly, Democrats promoted the law in the most racist way possible.
According to the Republicans, the law was supposed to let everyone out of prison. Did you see the dancing ballerina inmates in that video? Now is that what you meant by "racist promotion?" But that came from the GOP....
Trump got rid a large chunks of the racist law that you people hated and you get butt hurt at Trump.
How again did he get rid of that law? how did he do that exactly? Was it an executive order? was it new legislation? Do tell
-
Clearly, you are a troll.
We have gone over the words used by the Democrats to describe black people when promoting the law. I'm not going to play your bullshit games.
Even Kamala talked about how racist their promotion of the crime bill was when she ran in 2020.
Corry Booker also talked about how racist it is.
-
@raphjd
Do you actually know the story of how that new law passed? Cuz it wasn't Trump on his own...Knowing there'd be a conservative backlash against prison reform, Jared Kushner (who thought up the initial idea for the legislation itself) had brought four Republican senators to the oval office one day to convince Trump to endorse the legislation. They walked Trump through the main elements of the legislation, and he seemed on board.
As the group walked out of the oval office, senator Mike Lee of Utah gave kushner a hug.
"so we got it" he said excitedly. Kushner knew better.
"No no no, that's a soft yes." Kushner said.
"What do you mean?" Lee replied.
"So right now what I have to do is bring in people who hate the policy that we're trying to do, because if we think it's a yes, he'll change his mind when Tom Cotton's on Tucker Carlson basically explaining how we're letting rapists and murderers out."
Kushner's approach worked and Trump became a firmer yes, but then he needed to persuade Mitch McConnell, who agreed to schedule a vote only if Kushner and his allies came up with 60 votes beforehand to make it filibuster proof. Then McConnell raised his demand to 80 votes.
Only through the help of liberals like Van Jones, the activist and CNN pundit, was Kushner and Mike Pence able to secure the votes needed to pass the legislation.
So when you say we have Trump to thank for that, think again.
The speed of light from Earth to the Moon in real time (c = 3×10^8 m/s) -
And what did your god, St Obama of Racial Division do about the racist law?!
CNN, a bunch of proven liars, is your source? You are a joke.
Hello! It looks like you're interested in this conversation, but you don't have an account yet.
Getting fed up of having to scroll through the same posts each visit? When you register for an account, you'll always come back to exactly where you were before, and choose to be notified of new replies (either via email, or push notification). You'll also be able to save bookmarks and upvote posts to show your appreciation to other community members.
With your input, this post could be even better 💗
Register Login