Reddit is racist
-
Over the last few years, Reddit has routinely changed its rules to suit the liberal agenda.
Now Reddit is not allowing showing non-whites (not sure if this includes women) as the criminal aggressor, such as Boulder mass shooting by a Syrian.
Once again, the left is trying to hide the truth, so they can spew their anti-white narrative.
It's like how feminists claim that women are always innocent victims, never the bad guy, because in counties like the UK, Israel, India and many others, women can legally not commit certain crimes. As an example, you can "legally" say that women have never, ever committed domestic violence in Israel, India and other countries. Or that no woman in the UK has ever committed rape or other severe sex crimes.
I can't talk about the comparison/similarities between Dylann Roof and Emanuel Samson. I can't say that Emanuel Samson shot up a white church in a racist attack.
-
@raphjd It is a group on reddit, not reddit itself. And these groups can themselves make their own rules in these groups. So it is not true, what you write.
-
True, it was posted by a group admin/mod on Reddit.
What is not true is that Reddit's updated rules and policies had no bearing on this, unless you are calling the author of the post a liar.
Please provide proof that the author of that is a liar.
-
@raphjd https://www.redditinc.com/policies/user-agreement
I have read NOTHING about that in their user-agreement. So if you have any proff, that what you are writting is true, then YOU have to proff it. What a person has written in a group that is NOT proff, it has to come from Reddit itself.
Or I could make a post here and say that now my terms are the new terms of gaytorrent. That is NOT, how it works. As a moderator, you should know that. -
Says the guy who lied, claiming I edited a direct quote from an official tweet.
-
Oh, and Twitter never OFFICIALLY banned "learn to code", but in practice they did.
You can watch the Joe Rogan podcast with Tim Pool and Jack Dorsey and the Twitter lawyer. You know, the same Twitter lawyer that cried over Elon Musk buying Twitter. They admit they ban accounts who posted that to the journalists who cried about losing their jobs. The same ignorant cunt journalists who told people in other industries who lost their jobs to "learn to code".
YouTube never officially banned naming the anti-Trump whistleblower, but in practice, it's still the rule. You can out whistleblowers against liberals, though.
Facebook also has countless rules they enforce, that they don't have in their official rules.
-
@raphjd Well you did edit the tweet. Quote: US State Department says there are only 2 genders. When you write like this, then you are changing the whole sentiment of what they actually wrote. And you know that, because you are clever enough to know that, but you have an agenda here. But don't say that others lie, when you get called out about it.
-
@raphjd And you couldn't find any proff at all, or you would have posted it. Don't know why you are so eager to spread misinformation.
-
That is a lie, but it's typical for the left/libersls.
I posted the direct quote. I even did the screen grab and posted it.
You are (intentionally or not) confusing "edited quote" with adding commentary and paraphrasing. The thread title was my commentary/paraphrasing and the body of the post included the unaltered quote.
-
You can't disprove it, so I have to prove it.
I gave you direct evidence of how they make unofficial rules that they enforce, which there is plenty of proof of.
Maybe you can prove that Reddit never, ever has unofficial rules that they don't make public. Since that is your claim.
-
@raphjd An unofficial rule is NOT a rule. The only thing, that you have done, is a post from a group. You have NOT posted a rule from reddit and you stated that it came from reddit itself, it is not.
-
An unofficial rule that they enforce, is a rule.
Twitter never, ever officially banned "learn to code" when used against journalists, but they did ban people for posting it. Likewise with all big tech.
As I posted earlier, you can go watch the Joe Rogan podcast and watch where Tim Pool calls them out for it and the Twitter lawyer and Jock Dorsey make up lame excuses why they banned for it despite not being an official rule.
I think you need to bitch to the clowns in big tech and tell them under no certain terms that they violated their own rules by banning for breaking non-rules.
Hello! It looks like you're interested in this conversation, but you don't have an account yet.
Getting fed up of having to scroll through the same posts each visit? When you register for an account, you'll always come back to exactly where you were before, and choose to be notified of new replies (either via email, or push notification). You'll also be able to save bookmarks and upvote posts to show your appreciation to other community members.
With your input, this post could be even better 💗
Register Login