• Categories
    • Recent
    • Tags
    • Popular
    • Users
    • Groups
    • Torrents
    • Login

    "Nobody should trust Wikipedia" says co-founder

    Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved Politics & Debate
    3 Posts 2 Posters 18 Views 1 Watching
    Loading More Posts
    • Oldest to Newest
    • Newest to Oldest
    • Most Votes
    Reply
    • Reply as topic
    Log in to reply
    This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
    • raphjdR Offline
      raphjd Forum Administrator
      last edited by

      There have been feminist "edit-a-thons" which some colleges give course credits for.

      E6gdeFgWQAAjXKM.jpeg

      E 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
      • E Offline
        eobox91103 @raphjd
        last edited by

        @everyone Wikipedia needs to be approached with the same caution as any other online source: Look at the references cited to see if (a) they exist, (b) they're relevant and credible, and (c) actually say what the main article infers them to say.

        Some Wikipedia articles are as well-referenced as a scholarly paper. For example, the article on "BitTorrent" has 114 references.

        Other articles might have few or no relevant references, and there's an automatic banner at the top of the article basically saying "reader beware." I've seen this many times, and I take those pages with a large boulder of salt. Most recently, for example, I looked up the "Vallée Blanche Cable Car" in France. At the top of the page, the reader is warned,

        • "This article includes a list of general references, but it remains largely unverified because it lacks sufficient corresponding inline citations. Please help to improve this article by introducing more precise citations."

        It reminds us of the first lesson in Web Surfing 101: Don't believe what's on a web page unless you check its sources.

        raphjdR 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
        • raphjdR Offline
          raphjd Forum Administrator @eobox91103
          last edited by

          @eobox91103

          I've posted before about Wikipedia being flat-out wrong.

          The most recent one, for example, was about which member of the Kennedy dynasty to be the last to hold public office. Wikipedia lists 2 people as being the last to hold public office, despite there being a decade between when they left office.

          Both articles appear to be well-sourced, but one is clearly wrong.

          1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0

          Hello! It looks like you're interested in this conversation, but you don't have an account yet.

          Getting fed up of having to scroll through the same posts each visit? When you register for an account, you'll always come back to exactly where you were before, and choose to be notified of new replies (either via email, or push notification). You'll also be able to save bookmarks and upvote posts to show your appreciation to other community members.

          With your input, this post could be even better đź’—

          Register Login
          • 1 / 1
          • First post
            Last post