• Categories
    • Recent
    • Tags
    • Popular
    • Users
    • Groups
    • Torrents
    • Login

    82% Miscarry After Vaccine: Prestigious Medical Journal

    Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved Politics & Debate
    9 Posts 4 Posters 40 Views 1 Watching
    Loading More Posts
    • Oldest to Newest
    • Newest to Oldest
    • Most Votes
    Reply
    • Reply as topic
    Log in to reply
    This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
    • ManHandlerM Offline
      ManHandler
      last edited by ManHandler

      Yep. They want to depopulate. You think this is a joke? You think it's conspiracy THEORY? It's not. This is what ALL liberals dream of. "Too many people," is their stated credo because "global warming." It's OBVIOUS.

      https://banned.video/watch?id=60dfba8eff4e6f3eeefc8208

      E 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
      • E Offline
        eobox91103 @ManHandler
        last edited by

        @manhandler The linked video page description says that the New England Journal of Medicine came to these findings.

        That's not true, and likely why that video page didn't cite a specific paper.

        If you're willing to learn about this topic, see:

        https://apnews.com/article/fact-checking-724952235185

        https://news.wttw.com/2021/04/21/new-data-reassuring-covid-19-vaccination-pregnancy

        https://www.healio.com/news/primary-care/20210426/preliminary-data-show-mrna-covid19-vaccines-safe-during-pregnancy

        https://www.jwatch.org/na53527/2021/05/03/covid-19-mrna-vaccines-appear-safe-during-pregnancy

        ManHandlerM 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 1
        • ManHandlerM Offline
          ManHandler @eobox91103
          last edited by

          @eobox91103

          https://www.nejm.org/doi/full/10.1056/NEJMoa2104983

          https://www.reddit.com/r/conspiracy/comments/ocqrto/the_new_england_journal_of_medicine_shows_that/

          raphjdR E 2 Replies Last reply Reply Quote 0
          • raphjdR Offline
            raphjd Forum Administrator @ManHandler
            last edited by

            New England Journal of Medicine, Table 1 says that 13.5% had a positive pregnancy test after being vaccinated compared to 86.5% when they got vaccinated.

            In the results section, they say that just over 26% had negative pregnancy results. Just over half were miscarriages and the rest were live births but with serious complications.

            ManHandlerM 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
            • ManHandlerM Offline
              ManHandler @raphjd
              last edited by

              @raphjd Let's be real with the numbers. They lied. And still are lying.

              1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
              • E Offline
                eobox91103 @ManHandler
                last edited by

                @manhandler said in 82% Miscarry After Vaccine: Prestigious Medical Journal:

                @eobox91103

                https://www.nejm.org/doi/full/10.1056/NEJMoa2104983

                https://www.reddit.com/r/conspiracy/comments/ocqrto/the_new_england_journal_of_medicine_shows_that/

                You're mis-reading the statistics.

                First, let's dismiss the reddit post--it's on their "conspiracy" page.

                Next, let's take a careful read of the NEJM article. The sample set was of 35,691 women. Table 1 shows that 86.5% of these were pregnant at the time of vaccination, and the remaining 15.5% became pregnant shortly after the vaccination. This does NOT mean, as conspiracy theorists want to believe, that the 86.5% somehow lost their pregnancy shortly after vaccination. It means that those 15.5% were women who became pregnant after the study and thus were included in it.

                What was the outcome of the vaccinated pregnant women? Let's look at Table 4. The pregnancy and neo-natal outcomes from vaccinated-mother pregnancies were completely in line with incidence rates from the larger population--in fact is some areas, adverse outcomes were a bit lower than the larger population averages, but a much larger study would be needed to establish that.

                So, based on real data rather than prejudiced preconception, one can confidently assert what the researchers (and their peer reviewers) stated:

                RESULTS
                Although not directly comparable, calculated proportions of adverse pregnancy and neonatal outcomes in persons vaccinated against Covid-19 who had a completed pregnancy were similar to incidences reported in studies involving pregnant women that were conducted before the Covid-19 pandemic.

                CONCLUSIONS
                Preliminary findings did not show obvious safety signals among pregnant persons who received mRNA Covid-19 vaccines.

                ManHandlerM 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 1
                • ManHandlerM Offline
                  ManHandler @eobox91103
                  last edited by

                  @eobox91103 https://www.newswars.com/top-doctor-covid-vaccines-killing-babies-in-first-trimester-at-astonishing-rate/

                  Texas A&M professor of medicine Dr. Peter McCullough warns against vaccinating pregnant women for COVID-19, claiming the vaccines are completely unnecessary for pregnant women and are “directly killing babies in the first trimester.”

                  E 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                  • E Offline
                    eobox91103 @ManHandler
                    last edited by

                    @manhandler said in 82% Miscarry After Vaccine: Prestigious Medical Journal:

                    @eobox91103 https://www.newswars.com/top-doctor-covid-vaccines-killing-babies-in-first-trimester-at-astonishing-rate/

                    Texas A&M professor of medicine Dr. Peter McCullough warns against vaccinating pregnant women for COVID-19, claiming the vaccines are completely unnecessary for pregnant women and are “directly killing babies in the first trimester.”

                    One nutcase on a conspiracy website. No more need be said.

                    1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 1
                    • D Offline
                      di3di3di3
                      last edited by

                      Hopefully this is the case, I don't want libs breeding xD

                      1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 1

                      Hello! It looks like you're interested in this conversation, but you don't have an account yet.

                      Getting fed up of having to scroll through the same posts each visit? When you register for an account, you'll always come back to exactly where you were before, and choose to be notified of new replies (either via email, or push notification). You'll also be able to save bookmarks and upvote posts to show your appreciation to other community members.

                      With your input, this post could be even better 💗

                      Register Login
                      • 1 / 1
                      • First post
                        Last post