More proof that fact checkers lie
-
I didn't remember her name, so I described her.
She did not make a mistake. She lied. She even bragged about lying on her social media.
She is still part of the fact-checkers used by FB and Twitter.
BTW, I would have called her "that fat white chick" if she were white. Nice try at making everything "racist" though. Maybe that's why you think Priti Patel is a racist because everything is racist to you.
-
Let me guess, you got the liberal news version of events.
Politi-Fact lied and didn't want to change it until Candace got her legal team on it.
-
I didn't remember her name, so I described her.
She did not make a mistake. She lied. She even bragged about lying on her social media.
She is still part of the fact-checkers used by FB and Twitter.
BTW, I would have called her "that fat white chick" if she were white. Nice try at making everything "racist" though. Maybe that's why you think Priti Patel is a racist because everything is racist to you.
So I didn't 'try' anything - I said (if you would ever bother to read what I write) that you are either ignorant or a racist… and so you were instead ignorant. I don't really think that improves anything. It takes all of 2 seconds to look up someone's name.
No, saying "that fat white chick" would not have improved things and I would have called you out on that as well.
Please provide the evidence to support your claim that she lied rather than making a mistake. As her tweets seem to suggest otherwise: https://www.haaretz.com/us-news/new-yorker-apologizes-for-worker-claiming-ice-worker-had-nazi-tattoo-1.6196886
-
Let me guess, you got the liberal news version of events.
Politi-Fact lied and didn't want to change it until Candace got her legal team on it.
OK - please provide the evidence to support your claim.
I will happily believe you if you provide the evidence of it.
Let me guess, you got your news from some right-wing conspiracy nut on YouTube who is usually wrong about everything?
-
So I didn't 'try' anything - I said (if you would ever bother to read what I write) that you are either ignorant or a racist… and so you were instead ignorant. I don't really think that improves anything. It takes all of 2 seconds to look up someone's name.
Whelp, that ends our discussions.
-
So I didn't 'try' anything - I said (if you would ever bother to read what I write) that you are either ignorant or a racist… and so you were instead ignorant. I don't really think that improves anything. It takes all of 2 seconds to look up someone's name.
Whelp, that ends our discussions.
Hah! Typical of the not very capable right wing… soon as someone does to then what they do to others, they get all upset and run off crying
Well, clearly you’re not able to provide anything like what is required to prove your claims... and so we can safely ignore them as made up nonsense by biased people.
Fact checkers are fine to use again
-
I won't get into name-calling with you.
I used descriptors for her. Ok, I remembered her wrong, in that she's an arab jew, not black.
She is still fat.
She lied because she jumped at the chance to fulfill her narrative of labeling ICE agents as nazis. She didn't fact-check it.
You claim to be center-right, but you care more about me calling her fat than the harm she did to the disabled war vet. You care more that I called her black, than the fact that she is still a fact checker for social media.
Her "apology" was clearly corporate lawyer written.
-
I won't get into name-calling with you.
I used descriptors for her. Ok, I remembered her wrong, in that she's an arab jew, not black.
She is still fat.
She lied because she jumped at the chance to fulfill her narrative of labeling ICE agents as nazis. She didn't fact-check it.
You claim to be center-right, but you care more about me calling her fat than the harm she did to the disabled war vet. You care more that I called her black, than the fact that she is still a fact checker for social media.
Her "apology" was clearly corporate lawyer written.
You won’t get into name calling with me?! Hilarious… seeing as that’s all you ever seem to do (I quote: “leftist”, “low information” etc... I could go on...). I’m pleased to see you’re glowing up and putting this behind you... now that someone had decided enough from you is enough and to treat you with the same medicine. Glad you don’t like it either!
Exactly - your poor memory is not great, and so your descriptions are faulty... and... still... irrelevant. It should have been quicker for you to type in a few quick lines in Google to confirm her name, then post that.
No one cares if she’s fat. Except you. Do you like fat women or something?!
If you had actually used descriptors for her, you would have said: “a fact-checker contractor for PolitiFact”. This is how you should have described her... do you see now why your claims of “I just described her!!!” make you look silly, at best?
She still didn’t lie... keep claiming this all you like, but the more you do, the more it is you who is lying... unless you can prove it, as I’ve asked you for... so, can you?
And now you’ve made another claim about me... and yet you have no idea, at all, what I care about. So let’s clear some things up for you:
No I don’t care more about you calling her fat and black than I care about the vet... but because you did that, I was forced to explain to you about how silly you’re making yourself look instead of addressing the wider topic. (Same goes for your lies and misinformation about her reasoning).
No I don’t care more about the fact she’s black than that she’s still a fact checker for social media... any? Because I don’t care about either of those things at all... and why? A person being black is irrelevant to me... and a person making 1 mistake does not mean their career and job is over (obviously!).Does that help clear things up for you? Or would you like to make some more incorrect claims?
-
Blah, blah, blah
She's fat. She's fat. She's fat. You care that she's fat, otherwise you wouldn't get so butt hurt over me saying it.
She was a fact checker, which was in her Twitter bio at the time, when she falsely claimed that the guy had nazi tatoos. It suited her narrative of ICE agents, military, etc, etc, etc of being nazis, so she ran with it.
Her social media is now locked, so we can no longer look at it.
You care more about defending her than the damage she did and tried to do to the vet she lied about. You are garbarge.
-
Blah, blah, blah
She's fat. She's fat. She's fat. You care that she's fat, otherwise you wouldn't get so butt hurt over me saying it.
She was a fact checker, which was in her Twitter bio at the time, when she falsely claimed that the guy had nazi tatoos. It suited her narrative of ICE agents, military, etc, etc, etc of being nazis, so she ran with it.
Her social media is now locked, so we can no longer look at it.
You care more about defending her than the damage she did and tried to do to the vet she lied about. You are garbarge.
The only garbage that is here is what keeps spewing from you.
If this is the best you can do, I’m afraid you’re only proving your side isn’t very capable or intelligent.
Would you like to try harder?
Here’s a recommendation so you don’t look quite so foolish: don’t attempt to claim knowledge of what I believe or care about… that will only ever make you look very, very silly. The only person who can know that is me... or you, if I explain it to you. So saying that I care about something immediately after I’ve said I don’t... only makes you look like a child who’s trying to win a playground argument. Is that you?
So again, you’re just repeating your same claims over and over. You’ve got nothing else, clearly, else you would have used it by now.
So I’m not going to believe you. You haven’t convinced me - not because, as I’m sure you’re going to try to claim, I only believe my leftist sources - but because your ability to convince is so poor, the only thing you can do is convince yourself.
-
This has spiraled into nonsense. The only garbage is being spewed by the left, as usual.
-
Whiny leftists trying to act superior because they are "woke" are always fun.
-
First of all, Twitter is censoring the President of the United States every time he posts something about the election, saying it's contested by the media. Well, yea, Joe Biden's claim to be President Elect is being contested, by the President of the United States. So why aren't Biden's posts being censored since he's being contested by the most high office in the world? It's self-evident bro. It's in your face. Your argument is about how Raph described the woman, and has nothing to do with the substance. You are living in denial and it's obvious.
Hello! It looks like you're interested in this conversation, but you don't have an account yet.
Getting fed up of having to scroll through the same posts each visit? When you register for an account, you'll always come back to exactly where you were before, and choose to be notified of new replies (either via email, or push notification). You'll also be able to save bookmarks and upvote posts to show your appreciation to other community members.
With your input, this post could be even better 💗
Register Login