Definition of Fascism
-
So, tweets from liberals themselves, not just "conspiracy theories", hasn't been something you have seen. HUH.
As I said, liberals are low information. They don't know anything unless Rachel Maddow and the like tell them.
You are laughable.
Dylan Roof became infamous because he was white and shot up a black church.
Emanuel Samson didn't get the same notoriety because he was black and shot up a white church.
MSM rarely covers black on white crime. It's because they want to portray blacks as the victims in everything.
-
So, tweets from liberals themselves, not just "conspiracy theories", hasn't been something you have seen. HUH.
As I said, liberals are low information. They don't know anything unless Rachel Maddow and the like tell them.
You are laughable.
Dylan Roof became infamous because he was white and shot up a black church.
Emanuel Samson didn't get the same notoriety because he was black and shot up a white church.
MSM rarely covers black on white crime. It's because they want to portray blacks as the victims in everything.
Your first sentence either doesn't make sense or is meaningless… mind trying again?
Again, right-wing conservatives are uneducated and so don't know how to put together sentences... they also don't understand difficult arguments that have nuance and complexity to them... they're just not very intelligent people who like to pretend they have 'the truth' on their side, all the time whilst pointing to nonsense and conspiracy theories...
So you disagree with me... and your way of disproving my points is... to state your same argument again... right...
So... as that seems to be the way you think you can convince others that you're right, here's what I wrote again for you:
And why has Dylan Roof become more well known? Well, it's probably for a number of reasons - none of them because he was white and not black. I can think of 2 reasons right off the bat:
1. It was a racially motivated attack... which is much more hated by the general populace than a 'revenge for racial prejudice' attack...
2. He killed 9 people instead of 1... (mass murderer instead of 'just' a murderer)
There are probably more, but I'm a good representative for what others will no doubt see of the same two crimes.Please do provide me the research that shows that black crimes against white people are less reported in all the main news outlets than white crimes against black people. I would love to see that! I've done a good-old-Google search and can find loads of times when black people committing crimes are reported there... and I can find loads of times when white people have committed crimes against black people. So I expect this huge piece of research to be quite a massive undertaking... I really look forward to you sharing those results with me!
-
If you actually were as clued in as you think you are, then you would know that liberals have said these things and are not so conspiracy theory. Tucker Carlson and many others have actually shown these liberals saying this stuff, either on video or in social media posts. The fact that you don't know this, shows you are just another low information liberal.
You are just making excuses for liberal media won't report on black on white interracial crime in the same way they report on white on black crime.
Like most of Europe, Sadiq Khan has called crime stats and crime reporting "racist" because of the facts and figures. It's why some countries no longer record the races of the criminal. In the UK, you can always tell if the criminal is white because they tell you, but if they are non-white they leave the race out of the article.
-
If you actually were as clued in as you think you are, then you would know that liberals have said these things and are not so conspiracy theory. Tucker Carlson and many others have actually shown these liberals saying this stuff, either on video or in social media posts. The fact that you don't know this, shows you are just another low information liberal.
You are just making excuses for liberal media won't report on black on white interracial crime in the same way they report on white on black crime.
Like most of Europe, Sadiq Khan has called crime stats and crime reporting "racist" because of the facts and figures. It's why some countries no longer record the races of the criminal. In the UK, you can always tell if the criminal is white because they tell you, but if they are non-white they leave the race out of the article.
Oh dear me…
You’re sighting Tucker Carson as your ‘evidence’? Really?? Wow... I hope that’s a joke... that man is the definition of “low information”. Hahahaha! This will be cake to tear apart... as usual from the truly uneducated and clueless right wing fools.
So, I’ve said a couple times now that I’m sure people like that do exist. I’ve also said several times now that it doesn’t matter and that it doesn’t mean everyone is like that. Are you a racist, uneducated cretin? Because I can find plenty of videos and social media posts by right wing imbeciles who are those things - and so you must be too, by your logic... right?
I seem to have to keep repeating myself with you. Why is that? Is there some difficulty you have with understanding what I’m saying that means you can’t follow my reason and logic? If so, please tell me so I can work on it more carefully with you. I don’t want to ignore peoples handicaps.
Yet again you’re claiming something I have seen no evidence for: provide the evidence that supports your claim that the media isn’t reporting these things as much. If you don’t have evidence... then this is just your belief. And is worthless. Simply: I don’t believe you... you’re just saying these things because you want to believe them.
What you’ve just claimed about the U.K. media is demonstrably untrue. All you would need to do would be a simple google search to show that. There are plenty of papers who report people's race alongside what they’re talking about. However... as should be insanely obvious to you... it’s irrelevant what their race is in relation to a crime. It doesn’t matter if they are white or black or brown. This has absolutely nothing to do with their crime - unless it is a racially motivated crime. I really don’t know why I’m having to explain this to someone who claims to be ‘in the know’ and obviously thinks they know so very much more than others... but there we are.
You’re not really demonstrating your amazing knowledge, are you? Come on... if you’re so clued up, you should be able to run rings around me... instead you refer to Tucker Carlson, you repeat yourself and you make baseless and actually inaccurate claims... surely, surely someone who’s clued up could do better than this?! Even Tucker Carson would think you’re doing a bad job here... just like he did with Sydney Powell!
-
You claimed to be educated and up to date on the news, yet you claim you haven't seen any proof, just CTs.
Tucker is more clued in than you since he has heard/read the comments you claim you have never heard/read. Just because you admit some might be like that, you still haven't seen/heard anyone say it. Clearly, you aren't as clued in as you like to think you are.
Constantly, MSM ignores crimes that go against the leftist agenda. That is why people like you don't seem to know anything about anything, unless Don Lemon, Chris Cuomo and Rachel Maddow tell you about it, even if it's a blatant lie, like Chris Cuomo being on his death bed from C-19, despite being out jogging every day and all the other lies.
2016 - Russia stole the election
2020 - our elections can't be stolen
Has the leftist MSM said anything about the lies told by the Obama admin on TV versus what they said in the secret hearings in the bunker? NO, they haven't because it defeats their narrative.
-
You claimed to be educated and up to date on the news, yet you claim you haven't seen any proof, just CTs.
Tucker is more clued in than you since he has heard/read the comments you claim you have never heard/read. Just because you admit some might be like that, you still haven't seen/heard anyone say it. Clearly, you aren't as clued in as you like to think you are.
Constantly, MSM ignores crimes that go against the leftist agenda. That is why people like you don't seem to know anything about anything, unless Don Lemon, Chris Cuomo and Rachel Maddow tell you about it, even if it's a blatant lie, like Chris Cuomo being on his death bed from C-19, despite being out jogging every day and all the other lies.
2016 - Russia stole the election
2020 - our elections can't be stolen
Has the leftist MSM said anything about the lies told by the Obama admin on TV versus what they said in the secret hearings in the bunker? NO, they haven't because it defeats their narrative.
And now you’ve defended into whatsboutery… please, for goodness sake, stick to the topic! It only makes you look like you have no clue about what you’re talking about. Not a good look!
I also said, again if you would bother reading and understanding what I’ve said, that I really don’t care if a few crazy liberals say stupid things. Just like I don’t care if a few crazy right-wingers say crazy things. Obviously. Because they’re irrelevant. To everyone. And should be just as irrelevant to you.
Again, please provide the proof of your belief about media outlets ignoring issues or not reporting them.
Please don’t spout on about more issues thinking that’s going to prove your point: it doesn’t. It’s called whataboutery, as I said above, and you need to prove the point - not constantly go on about this and that other story or whatever which you also claim to know about when others don’t. That will prove nothing much at all apart from you can make a whole bunch of claims - which we all can. But, is meaningless.
All it means is you’ll retrench into “I believe this stuff” and I’ll have only to constantly run around disproving every claim you come up with (ok, I can’t know I’ll be able to disprove every one... I’m sure... hopeful... some are real!).
As an aside, I can find plenty of far left people criticising left leaning centrists, and vice versa. Easily. So this stuff is very much available for those able to use Google...
-
You claimed to be educated and up to date on the news, yet you claim you haven't seen any proof, just CTs.
Tucker is more clued in than you since he has heard/read the comments you claim you have never heard/read. Just because you admit some might be like that, you still haven't seen/heard anyone say it. Clearly, you aren't as clued in as you like to think you are.
Constantly, MSM ignores crimes that go against the leftist agenda. That is why people like you don't seem to know anything about anything, unless Don Lemon, Chris Cuomo and Rachel Maddow tell you about it, even if it's a blatant lie, like Chris Cuomo being on his death bed from C-19, despite being out jogging every day and all the other lies.
2016 - Russia stole the election
2020 - our elections can't be stolen
Has the leftist MSM said anything about the lies told by the Obama admin on TV versus what they said in the secret hearings in the bunker? NO, they haven't because it defeats their narrative.
And just as an aside… you’ve misrepresented, again, what people have said about the 2016 and 2020 elections. Let me correct your assertions for you:
2016 - Russian interference altered the election result (evidence provided)
2020 - we have no evidence of any election interference or fraud
I hope you can see the difference in that... and no, they’re not the same. Really, really, obviously.
For apparently being so clued up, you really do miss the obvious stuff, don’t you?
And this leads to another inescapable conclusion... you’ve either claimed this because a) you didn’t understand the original point or b) you’re lying to try and ‘win’.
Which one?
-
Blah, blah, blah Your claims are garbage.
You have no clue about anything, and you keep admitting it.
You admit that you can believe that some liberals have said it, but you then go on to say that you have seen no direct proof of it, despite you claiming to be so clued in on what is going on.
I bet you still believe Shifty Schiff's claim that he has absolute proof of Russian collusion or that Antifa is a myth.
-
This argument is still going on, lol.
-
Blah, blah, blah Your claims are garbage.
You have no clue about anything, and you keep admitting it.
You admit that you can believe that some liberals have said it, but you then go on to say that you have seen no direct proof of it, despite you claiming to be so clued in on what is going on.
I bet you still believe Shifty Schiff's claim that he has absolute proof of Russian collusion or that Antifa is a myth.
And yet again, more whataboutery. Really it does make you look incredibly uninformed and not very clever… I really would stop doing it if I were you. Unless you’re intentionally trying to make your side of things look bad?
Again you claim I have no clue... whilst continually demonstrating you don’t have any clue at all about the things you’re talking about. And having that demonstrated publicly too... now I don’t mind if someone demonstrates I’m wrong about something, but I’ll wager your rather fragile sense of self worth doesn’t handle it so well. Hence the lack of ability to reply in any cognisant way.
Pity really... I’m always keen to meet people from the more extremes who can actually think and respond well. Guess I won’t find that in you.
-
More crap from the lefty.
If I don't view things exactly as you do, then I'm uninformed.
You claim to be clued in on the news, but called it CTs that your side has called for communist style re-education camps, blacklists, tribunals and what not to punish Trump supporters. If you actually watched the news, real news, you would have seen the videos and social media posts from liberals calling for those things. But of course, you watch only leftist news so you haven't seen it.
-
More crap from the lefty.
If I don't view things exactly as you do, then I'm uninformed.
You claim to be clued in on the news, but called it CTs that your side has called for communist style re-education camps, blacklists, tribunals and what not to punish Trump supporters. If you actually watched the news, real news, you would have seen the videos and social media posts from liberals calling for those things. But of course, you watch only leftist news so you haven't seen it.
More crap from the righty. If I don’t believe in conspiracy theories and believe everything he says without any evidence, I must be “low information”.
I tell you what… why don’t you prove that everyone in the left is calling for all the things you say they are, rather than just repeating the claim over and over and over again? Surely that would be the intelligent thing to do... prove me wrong? Go on... go for it!
But I warn you... If you point to isolated incidents by no-body’s making these... demands... I’m going to say: yes, exactly what I said... there are fools and idiots on both sides!
But, of course, you only watch right wing silly made up stations on YouTube, so you have no idea what’s actually going on... chowing to believe someone who is not credible, not very intelligent and makes stuff up demonstrably all the time just to appease a certain group of not terribly intelligent followers.
-
By the by, I know you don’t know terribly much about any of the topics we’re discussing here… but it would really help you to understand a couple, really easy, things:
1. I’m center-right in my thinking and actions... slightly conservative.
2. Where I’m from, the Liberals are the far rightI know this kind of goes against everything you think and believe (... have been told to believe...), but there you are! The world just happens to be that but more complex than your rather basic model implies.
Good luck!
-
LOL, ok.
Your news sources suck if they keep things from you, but you clearly like that.
As usual, you have no clue about what is going on, so you claim it's a CT. You refuse to learn what is being said by people. If the news goes against what you believe, it's junk news.
So, you are from Australia. Whoopee.
-
This reminds me of what I said earlier.
Most of the public does not see most of the dirty.
Every source you can possibly read, even the conspiracy, far left, far right, and other news sites, does not share or report everything because not everything is brought to light or leaked to them. Some news is actually faked or generated for specific purposes, down to a fine art.
Nobody will know the whole truth. Some of it is not worth knowing, and some of it will get one or many killed. Those in power can control some of the flow and ebb, but only some.
Don't put all of your eggs (trust/beliefs) in one basket.
-
LOL, ok.
Your news sources suck if they keep things from you, but you clearly like that.
As usual, you have no clue about what is going on, so you claim it's a CT. You refuse to learn what is being said by people. If the news goes against what you believe, it's junk news.
So, you are from Australia. Whoopee.
So me asking you to provide me the proof you claim, is me also refusing to learn what is being said by people… right...
You do realise your logical inconsistencies just make your arguments look poor, your so-called knowledge look non-existent and your general world view look uneducated and uninformed? Do you realise that?
Please provide the evidence I've asked for or stop making spurious, silly claims. Or you can continue to look bad and make your side look bad in the process.
My news sources don’t keep things from me - but then again, they don’t make stuff up either like the news sources you listen to so avidly.
And no, I’m not from Australia... shows how little you know about the world, yet again
-
@bc22:
This reminds me of what I said earlier.
Most of the public does not see most of the dirty.
Every source you can possibly read, even the conspiracy, far left, far right, and other news sites, does not share or report everything because not everything is brought to light or leaked to them. Some news is actually faked or generated for specific purposes, down to a fine art.
Nobody will know the whole truth. Some of it is not worth knowing, and some of it will get one or many killed. Those in power can control some of the flow and ebb, but only some.
Don't put all of your eggs (trust/beliefs) in one basket.
I’m not really sure this is helpful, to be honest. Or true…
Why do you believe this? Have you had evidence to support that this is the case? I would welcome seeing that!
News outlets (real ones, with credibility... not hacks pretending to be news...) are under pressure to find these sorts of hidden things out and expose them. They’ve done this quite a few times in the past... even on places like Wikileaks (whose entire purpose is to expose these sorts of things!).
I struggle to believe there’s this whole shadow world that just no one knows about except for the people in it (and, presumably, all the people close to it?) and that shadowy world is so effective at keeping things from the rest of us that no one, no where, at any point or time, has leaked anything about it. I mean we had Snowden, for heaven sake... he let something out that’s pretty horrendous that the American government was perpetuating on the population. And he was not only able to share that, but leave the country with vast amounts of its secrets and travel to 2... how to say it... less on-side countries! And is still alive.
Of course there is one way you could find out about all this stuff for sure... go work for the government/go into politics. Then you would have to know, surely? Why don’t you do that?
-
So, you are from Australia. Whoopee.
You know… had to think about this more to realise it... but this is just sort of typical of where you’re at and what you don’t understand.
I explained to you something that shows, without any doubt, that your way of labelling and describing this is silly and is making you look like a fool.
Your response?
“Whopee”.
Surely you must realise that by taking that response... you are admitting you didn’t understand what I said (maybe? Happy to explain further for you, if that would help!) or you can’t... because the rest of your knowledge is so deficient you can’t actually understand these things (maybe akin to explaining general relativity to a child...).
Those are your only two options... that’s it. That’s all you can come away with this from...
So, do you want me to explain it further to you? Why calling people liberal doesn’t mean what you’re trying to make it mean? That saying that all groups of all of those people are the same, is literally nonsense? I’m very happy to give you a 101 in politics and how it sits together, if you would like it.
-
Not going to happen, Calatar. You must think I'm very young and have not been anywhere yet.
The more I've seen, the less I know. Pales in comparison to my partner who has held security clearances in the past.
There's no shadow world, just reality (often filtered or changed) and a lot of people (including me) only get to see a small portion of that in a lifetime. Some of what is seen is often not realized for what it is. Ha, I'm starting to sound like a conspiracy nut myself.
Do believe in what you want to, as everyone needs their own straws to reality and their fairy tales. This will never be a sane world.
-
@bc22:
Not going to happen, Calatar. You must think I'm very young and have not been anywhere yet.
The more I've seen, the less I know. Pales in comparison to my partner who has held security clearances in the past.
There's no shadow world, just reality (often filtered or changed) and a lot of people (including me) only get to see a small portion of that in a lifetime. Some of what is seen is often not realized for what it is. Ha, I'm starting to sound like a conspiracy nut myself.
Do believe in what you want to, as everyone needs their own straws to reality and their fairy tales. This will never be a sane world.
Oh I see! Sorry, I think I misunderstood what you were referring to.
Yes, I’m sorry - it did sound sort of conspiracy theory-esque! But what you were meaning is that we all just only get to experience a small amount of all the stuff that happens to happen in our world within the confines of our lifespan… which I couldn’t agree more with.
I’m a bit of an experience nut... so I go out and seek experiences, as much as possible (no, not in the climb Everest, BASE jumping sort of way!). I’ve had a number of different and fun ‘careers’ in my life so far... and about to embark on a new one. Exciting! Can’t wait
I hope you’ll continue to find and explore the world as much as you can too. And even better you can do it with your partner! (I’m the one who has held the highest level security clearances in my relationship...
).
Hello! It looks like you're interested in this conversation, but you don't have an account yet.
Getting fed up of having to scroll through the same posts each visit? When you register for an account, you'll always come back to exactly where you were before, and choose to be notified of new replies (either via email, or push notification). You'll also be able to save bookmarks and upvote posts to show your appreciation to other community members.
With your input, this post could be even better 💗
Register Login