Apple hates white people

[Grotomode]

So, they're dishonest and deceitful (like most brands).
Where does the white hatred come into play here?

[raphjd]

Maybe you should re-read the entire thread.

They prey on whites with a deceitful charity name to fund something whites can't benefit from.

I would go so far as to say that this "global" charity for Africans with HIV/AIDS won't help white Africans.

[Grotomode]

You specifically could go as far as saying many things. A lot of people can.
I still dont see the hatred of white people.

[raphjd]

Ok, let's change it to "love black Africans above all else".

[Grotomode]

They love and hate no one.
They love profitable business and misleading charity for good publicity. As simple as that.

[raphjd]

What they are doing is using deceitful practices aimed at whites to benefit black Africans.

As I said before, it's like a charity called ALL LIVE MATTER, but excludes everyone except BLM.

[Grotomode]

Still not hatred dude.
Your analogy is irrelevant.

[raphjd]

Defrauding one group to benefit another group, other than leftism, is what then?

If Apple targetted black Africans to fund a "global" charity that only benefitted white North Americans, would be?

[nick75]

Hello,

Your train of thought has derailed here mate.
First, it's called "global fund to fight AIDS" not "fund to fight AIDS globally". HUGE difference. You can call it misleading or dishonest at worst if you want.
But calling it hatred is a stretch! Is it self-serving? virtue signalling? a PR stunt? Probably but hate, calm down.

[nick75]

Also, defrauding means they've done something illegal. Where?

How is this hidden in the small prints? (See attachments)
You don't know what small prints actually means.

[raphjd]

I already talked about how they buried the truth in the small print.

AGAIN, why not be honest and name the charity so it reflects it's true purpose of only supporting black Africans?    Maybe a name like the "We only care about black Africans with HIV?AIDS fund - fuck you and give us your money".

[nick75]

@nick75:

First, it's called "global fund to fight AIDS" not "fund to fight AIDS globally". HUGE difference.

[raphjd]

I got that, but they are being dishonest with that.

It's called a "lie by omission".

To be truthful, it would be called "global fund, paid for by white people, to fight AIDS only for black Africans".

[Grotomode]

@raphjd:

Defrauding one group to benefit another group, other than leftism, is what then?

If Apple targetted black Africans to fund a "global" charity that only benefitted white North Americans, would be?

So after hatred the accusation is leftism. Do you by any chance equate the two?

Just because Apple knows who to ask money from and also who needs it most, doesnt mean they hate anyone. They dont give two **** if you're white. They have no feeling about that. They have a feeling about what they can do to stay in business. Even if they wanted to profit illegally, feelings about race are irrelevant. Simple logic.
You dont have to find a conspiracy theory behind everything.

[nick75]

Look at the attached picture. Do you notice anything?
It's as if they chose countries where the virus is most prevalent… who knew?

Source

[raphjd]

Hmm, so they don't care about all black Africans with HIV/AIDS.

However, the premise still stands.  They don't care about whites around the world with HIV/AIDS.

They support black Africans, despite the way whites in Africa are being treated.

[nick75]

How do you know they don't care about all black Africans with HIV?
Maybe it's difficult or impossible to intervene in other countries due to political or safety reasons?
Maybe they don't have enough people to handle more countries?

As I've shown earlier, countries where the virus is most prevalent are in Africa so it makes sense that they want to start there, don't you think?
Also, those countries are poor so it's logical to help them.

Your premise does not stand, you're pulling things out of thin air and extrapolating.

If you're so worried about HIV in white countries, here are some links: Europe and USA

[raphjd]

Which one of those western charities is Apple's?

[nick75]

RED isn't Apple's either. Source
You seemed so eager to help white people with HIV I thought I'd give you links so that you can donate and help!

Non-black countries where Apple contributed/donated/raised awareness:
2017: UK, Canada, USA, USA
2016: Ecuador and Japan, Canada, China, USA, USA, USA
For previous years and source: link

By the way, contrary to what you said earlier Apple gives money to RED from each iPhone sold worldwide (that includes non-white countries!!). Source.

[raphjd]

Apple doesn't promote sales of their non-RED phones as going to charity.

Me donating to a charity through Apple Pay, isn't quite the same as Apple donating to that charity.  Are you saying that every time I write a check and mail it to the charity that my bank and the post office are also donating to the charity?

The same applies to Apple allowing donations through Itunes.

The most you can say is that Apple created "storefronts" for some situations such as natural disaster relief and doled out the money collected to charities, such as the various national Red Cross charities.  For the rest, Apple only changed the rule banning donation buttons in apps.

It's nice of Apple to donate $1 million to the area they live in after the forest fires.  You do get that $1 million for that forest fire was less than 0.1% of the total cost of the forest fire and that's quite generous on my part because the forest fire was well over $1 Billion.    That's probably more than they paid in taxes worldwide that year.

Apple gave $1 million to the SPLC, which is a leftist group that falsely accuses people of being nazis.  They give to other leftist groups as well.

If Apple paid it's fair share of taxes, they'd do more for society the tiny bits you are bragging about them doing.