Our President called for the deaths of five innocent black teens
-
The problem is basically this: You act like Trump is totally aware of the fact that they were exonerated and still calling for their execution just because they are black. You don't know that. You are drawing conjectures. That's a problem - because it's subjective rather than objective. Just this week he talked about Arpaio's pardon, but Arpaio has been asking him publically about it for weeks. He is not all seeing and all-knowing. If you feel so strongly about it, then maybe you should write him a letter to tell him the information he is not privy to. He doesn't know everything - he's got a lot going on. He's not omniscient. The only one acting like he is - is you. You act like he should just know everything, or he's lying if he doesn't. Take your nonsense elsewhere. Plus you're acting like this is still current. Yea you are posting it now, but when was the last time it was even a discussion? Wasn't it over a year ago? Why are you bringing this in now? The first article you posted was from February of 2016. Yet you keep acting like he is "still" calling for their deaths here in August of 2017. This is ridiculous. You are a True propagandist.
-
He is not all seeing and all-knowing.
Oh, so you admit he's not the messiah?
Take your nonsense elsewhere. Plus you're acting like this is still current. Yea you are posting it now, but when was the last time it was even a discussion? Wasn't it over a year ago? Why are you bringing this in now?
2016 is very, very current. It wasn't that long ago that our president was a presidential candidate and the Republican nominee for president. Until he either apologizes or at least walks back his statements, it doesn't matter how much time goes by. The fact remains: he wants five innocent men DEAD NOW. Show me proof that he has walked back his statements on the matter? He was asked about it while running for president and on the record stated that he still wants them executed for what they did. What has been proven that they did that is punishable by death other than being innocent black men?? Can you answer that? Can anyone answer that and back it up with PROOF? Do you have court documents that prove otherwise and show they are indeed guilty of rape and attempted murder? Yeah…didn't think so. This is serious because our sitting president is someone calling for the deaths of innocent people for no other reason than the color of their skin, and my reasoning for believing so comes directly from his very own mouth. He called KKK members, neo-nazis and other white supremacists "good people" this past Tuesday on camera on LIVE TV. What kind of President of the United States calls white supremacists---one of which murdered a woman in that president's name---"good people?"
-
No, 2016 was last year. It's not current. You are trying to weave a story that Trump just wants some black guys to die for being black. You don't know that. You are just projecting what you want to believe. It's nonsense, and totally ludicrous. You are a propagandist. You are like "point A to point B." I don't care about what you say about this anymore. You are not convincing anyone. We are not changing our minds because of anything you say. Because it's stupid, and you are totally irrelevant because you are invoking the past without current information.
-
You are literally trying to weave a story that Trump just wants these guys to die because they are black. That is the dumbest propaganda I've ever heard. You are promoting your beliefs as though they are facts. This is the stupidest shit on the internet right now. It's just really, really stupid. Your IQ must be like… 19. LOL wow you really need to work on that. Your words are really just nonsense and nobody actually believes you. Really. Nobody believes that Trump is so hateful that he would just wish for some people to die because of their skin color. That is literally SO stupid I don't even know what level to put it on in my mind... Margaret Sanger literally said that blacks are weeds who need to be exterminated. That's Planned Parenthood's founder. Hillary praised her. I can't believe you would actually be so ignorant - but I think the reality is you just don't want to accept it. You guys think all Mexicans are poor and helpless based on the stereotypes you created, and therefore, they should just be able to hop over the fence without showing their ID, even if they are convicted murderers. I can't believe how dumb you guys really are.
-
You are literally trying to weave a story that Trump just wants these guys to die because they are black. That is the dumbest propaganda I've ever heard. You are promoting your beliefs as though they are facts. This is the stupidest shit on the internet right now. It's just really, really stupid. Your IQ must be like… 19. LOL wow you really need to work on that. Your words are really just nonsense and nobody actually believes you. Really. Nobody believes that Trump is so hateful that he would just wish for some people to die because of their skin color. That is literally SO stupid I don't even know what level to put it on in my mind... Margaret Sanger literally said that blacks are weeds who need to be exterminated. That's Planned Parenthood's founder. Hillary praised her. I can't believe you would actually be so ignorant - but I think the reality is you just don't want to accept it. You guys think all Mexicans are poor and helpless based on the stereotypes you created, and therefore, they should just be able to hop over the fence without showing their ID, even if they are convicted murderers. I can't believe how dumb you guys really are.
I have to disagree with you this time. This is FAR from the dumbest propaganda that the moonbats have come up with!
-
Yea I was exaggerating! You're right! Just more total f*cking nonsense
-
Margaret Sanger literally said that blacks are weeds who need to be exterminated. That's Planned Parenthood's founder. Hillary praised her.
And there's the Hillary Card! Was wondering when it would be played in a discussion that has nothing to do with her, because we all know Hillary Clinton is the APOTUS, the Alternative President of the United States.
-
You are literally trying to weave a story that Trump just wants these guys to die because they are black.
What other reason is there? They were exonerated many, many years ago and the state of New York by law has given them restitution. Do you have any evidence that they are guilty, and if so, why haven't you presented it to a court? The president wants them dead and you have not given me a logical explanation for why that is. Could it be because it's indefensible like I've been saying? Even raphjd hasn't made an effort to defend this disgusting belief the president CURRENTLY has. Show me undeniable proof that our president doesn't currently want those five men executed and I will leave this alone. Otherwise, you have not proven anything nor have you given a complete and logical defense for why our sitting current president wants five innocent, exonerated men dead today.
-
So, you'd be happy if Trump condemned every single liberals for the bikelock leftists?
You call it "deflection" to prevent anyone from comparing the groups and their actions. It's funny how you never want to compare groups you demonize (rightly or wrongly) to any other group.
There have been stabbings and shooting by leftists, so all people on the left are fucking evil and need to be killed.
I hate racists, they suck. HOWEVER, like we've been seeing the last 15 to 20 years, the left has been calling their enemies all the most hateful names as a way of justifying the evil shit the left does.
Watch Tucker Carlson. Liberals label anyone against illegal immigration, disagrees with BLM, etc, etc, etc, etc, etc, etc as Nazis and racists.
You called me a racist simply for pointing out that a Congressman lied twice, at the time, in recent months. That's how easy it is for the left to throw those kinds of nasty labels around.
You of all people know that I have called out violence on the left and that BEFORE CHARLOTTESVILLE the right hadn't done anything close to what the left was doing. However, the moment someone was ran over by a white supremacist in our president's name, the comparison argument became a losing argument. And for whatever reason, you're still clinging to that argument when pretty much everyone across the political spectrum has accepted that that argument is OVER. There are no points of comparison with death because you can't bring someone back from the dead. Now that we're at this point, your "bike lock liberal" argument has basically lost its validity. I was with you criticizing antifa and you know I was. But not now. Until antifa runs someone over or causes someone to lose their life AND THE MURDERER CLEARLY STATES THEY DID IT IN THE NAME OF ANTIFA, this argument is OVER and there are NO comparisons.
Now back to the point of this thread, the president calling KKK members and other white supremacists "good people" directly ties to his desire to execute five innocent black men. As a result, the overwhelming majority of the country is done with him. No amount of derailment by you or anyone else will change that fact and this problem isn't going away just because he got rid of one of the white supremacists in the White House.
I know you condemned the violence on both sides. I saw how your fellow liberals reacted, too.
Liberals claim that whenever one of their own do something bad, such as smashing people over the head with bike locks, it has nothing to do with being liberals. On the flip side, when someone on the right does something bad, all people on the right are guilty. We saw this here by a few liberals, but mainly from Magenta. Magenta and others kept up the "they weren't liberals, there were individuals" bullshit.
The left beat and stomped unconscious and bloodied people laying on the ground because they looked like they could be Nazis.
Professor Eric Clanton (the ultimate bike lock liberal) hit several people over the head with his bike lock. In the process, he fractured the skulls of at least 3 people. The most blatant case was the guy trying to keep everyone from getting violent. Clanton used his bike lock because he knew it would do extreme damage. You would expect that he's smart enough to know that smashing people over the head with that bike lock, that he could kill them.
You fellow liberals purposely set an occupied building on fire to prevent wrong speak.
Your fellow liberals (smugglypuff, to be exact) attacked a retired couple walking their dog because they looked like wrong thinkers.
Let's not forget about the shooting at the Repub baseball practise.
There's been shootings and stabbings by leftists.
If anything bad by the right is done in Trump's name, then anything bad done by the left is done in the name of every liberal politico.
Obama, Hillary, and the rest are a part of this discussion. They played the race/vag card every time they could. Obama race baited Michael Brown and even sent 100 FBI agents to prove it. "HANDS UP, DON'T SHOOT" was proven to be a complete lie but black politicians kept using it.
Where the fuck were all the leftist heroes when their own were committing extremely violent acts, including murder?! They were doubling down blaming the victims or excusing the vile actions of the left in some sort of bullshit way.
-
So, you'd be happy if Trump condemned every single liberals for the bikelock leftists?
You call it "deflection" to prevent anyone from comparing the groups and their actions. It's funny how you never want to compare groups you demonize (rightly or wrongly) to any other group.
There have been stabbings and shooting by leftists, so all people on the left are fucking evil and need to be killed.
I hate racists, they suck. HOWEVER, like we've been seeing the last 15 to 20 years, the left has been calling their enemies all the most hateful names as a way of justifying the evil shit the left does.
Watch Tucker Carlson. Liberals label anyone against illegal immigration, disagrees with BLM, etc, etc, etc, etc, etc, etc as Nazis and racists.
You called me a racist simply for pointing out that a Congressman lied twice, at the time, in recent months. That's how easy it is for the left to throw those kinds of nasty labels around.
You of all people know that I have called out violence on the left and that BEFORE CHARLOTTESVILLE the right hadn't done anything close to what the left was doing. However, the moment someone was ran over by a white supremacist in our president's name, the comparison argument became a losing argument. And for whatever reason, you're still clinging to that argument when pretty much everyone across the political spectrum has accepted that that argument is OVER. There are no points of comparison with death because you can't bring someone back from the dead. Now that we're at this point, your "bike lock liberal" argument has basically lost its validity. I was with you criticizing antifa and you know I was. But not now. Until antifa runs someone over or causes someone to lose their life AND THE MURDERER CLEARLY STATES THEY DID IT IN THE NAME OF ANTIFA, this argument is OVER and there are NO comparisons.
Now back to the point of this thread, the president calling KKK members and other white supremacists "good people" directly ties to his desire to execute five innocent black men. As a result, the overwhelming majority of the country is done with him. No amount of derailment by you or anyone else will change that fact and this problem isn't going away just because he got rid of one of the white supremacists in the White House.
I know you condemned the violence on both sides. I saw how your fellow liberals reacted, too.
Liberals claim that whenever one of their own do something bad, such as smashing people over the head with bike locks, it has nothing to do with being liberals. On the flip side, when someone on the right does something bad, all people on the right are guilty. We saw this here by a few liberals, but mainly from Magenta. Magenta and others kept up the "they weren't liberals, there were individuals" bullshit.
The left beat and stomped unconscious and bloodied people laying on the ground because they looked like they could be Nazis.
Professor Eric Clanton (the ultimate bike lock liberal) hit several people over the head with his bike lock. In the process, he fractured the skulls of at least 3 people. The most blatant case was the guy trying to keep everyone from getting violent. Clanton used his bike lock because he knew it would do extreme damage. You would expect that he's smart enough to know that smashing people over the head with that bike lock, that he could kill them.
You fellow liberals purposely set an occupied building on fire to prevent wrong speak.
Your fellow liberals (smugglypuff, to be exact) attacked a retired couple walking their dog because they looked like wrong thinkers.
Let's not forget about the shooting at the Repub baseball practise.
There's been shootings and stabbings by leftists.
If anything bad by the right is done in Trump's name, then anything bad done by the left is done in the name of every liberal politico.
Obama, Hillary, and the rest are a part of this discussion. They played the race/vag card every time they could. Obama race baited Michael Brown and even sent 100 FBI agents to prove it. "HANDS UP, DON'T SHOOT" was proven to be a complete lie but black politicians kept using it.
Where the fuck were all the leftist heroes when their own were committing extremely violent acts, including murder?! They were doubling down blaming the victims or excusing the vile actions of the left in some sort of bullshit way.
More deflection, more derailment and absolutely no accountability. While I agree not enough coverage was shown to those bad acts on the left, you simply cannot compare any of it to the fact that so many white supremacists have been woken up and supported by this president. If deflection and derailment is all you have, then you have lost this argument. If false equivalency is all you have, then you have lost this argument. Senator Ben Sasse (R-NE) said very recently that, "a lot of violence is coming," and he's 100% right. This president has woken up something very disgusting and it has taken over a very important argument in this country; that is the argument for free speech. We need to have a serious discussion on free speech and the way the left is demonizing free speech, but our president has poisoned that argument by helping uplift this white supremacist element. It's one thing to say "liberals are harming free speech;" however, it is an entirely different thing to align yourself with KKK members, neo-nazis and other white supremacist groups to make your argument for free speech. He could've simply said those groups have every natural right to say, assemble and march all they want; but he didn't just say that. He has fully aligned himself with those groups and nothing anyone says now or years from now will remove that stain on his presidency. He did this. He caused this.
-
See, you never want to contrast/compare the actions on both sides. You only want to blame the right.
Like other liberals, you automatically blame ALL righties for the action of 1, while making it virtuously impossible to do the same for leftists. You're that kid that makes up games so only he can win.
Obama and BLM (and countless other leftists) were in bed together. So everything bad done by BLM and their supporters is the absolute fault of Obama, Hillary, Soros and many others. Unless you are willing to admit that you are making up special rules for the left.
Obama, Hillary, Soros and countless others did to the left, what you are claiming trump is doing to the right. Under Obama, blacks were so oppressed that they had the support of various levels of governments and universities that they were able to, with the protection of the police and state, oppress whites in a way that whites would never be allowed to do to blacks; such as "white people go around". The police only arrested whites who tried to cross the bridge, not the blacks that forced whites to walk through the creek. The same kind of thing at Evergreen and countless other places.
As much as I hate racists, they too have the right to free speech within the rules set by the Supreme Court.
As you're a Leftist, I understand your inability to understand to see the events of the last 15 to 20 years and see that this is blow back for all the bullshit from the left. We've talked about most of this stuff before. The white guy dragged from his car and beaten before the blacks stole his car because they ASSUMED he voted for Trump. The Chicago kidnapping as another lovely example. Blacks and leftists were screaming that none of this was a hate crime because only whitey can be racist and commit hate crimes.
I noticed you set extremely strict rules on blaming the left for actions of the left. Typical, so I'm not surprised. Ok, BLM is guilty of the murders of cops due to their followers killing cops.
Speaking of BLM, clearly everything belongs to them. They can't see an event that they don't want to make about themselves. The Orlando shooting of a gay nightclub, was taken over and became an event about BLM and hating white people. Gay Pride events all over the west have been hijacked by BLM. The pride flag is no longer about sexuality, but about race (except whites, cuz reasons).
In the UK, "visible minorities" make up less than 10%, yet legally, they have to have 35% representation in the media. You know, cuz equality. It used to be 30% but Tony Blair increased it to 35%. Apparently, having 3 times more representation that your share of the population isn't enough.
If you took an honest look at the figures, white supremacy was dying in the west, then along came identity politics from the west. NYC criminalizing the use mis-gendering and the use of the wrong personal pronouns. Canada following this lead. Western leaders refusing to call out Islamic terrorism and simply labelling it as terrorism. The Paris McDonald's shooter was "de-muslimed". They removed all references to his being a muslim and the anti west/pro islam stuff in his backpack. Even though his 1st name was David, he never used it. He only ever used his middle name, Ali. Despite this, the media almost never called him Ali. The BBC edited a video where a classmate referred to him as Ali. After about the first 12 hours, not a single left leaning media source called him Ali or even had it in articles about the topic.
Liberals in the UK allowed over 1,400 young white girls to be raped by a muslim group of men, mostly from Pakistan, because they didn't want to be seen as racist. That was just in Rotherham. Turns out the same thing was going on in many places.
Do you get why white supremacy is back on the rise again?
-
Do you get why white supremacy is back on the rise again?
Yeah, because people like you are defending it by using false equivalency. You can't "make" someone become a white supremacist. If a person has those feelings and believe America and European countries should be white only, then that person has always been a white supremacist. All this president did was give them the backing of the presidency and White House. He can try to walk it back all he wants now and it won't matter. His true self has appeared and it truly is the end of his presidency. I didn't start this thread to "only blame the right" for anything. This thread is about our bigoted president calling for the deaths of five innocent black men years after they were exonerated of every single charge they were falsely convicted of. Your constant derailment tells me everything I need to know.
At the end of the day, we have a president and he is being held accountable; so much so that it has caused major self-reflection within his administration and one of the white supremacists working with him has been expelled from government. This did not start with Steve Bannon–-after all the president has been calling for the deaths of those five innocent black men for a couple of decades now---and it will not stop with Steve Bannon. No amount of false equivalency is going to change how so many people see this president. The South lost the Civil War because a UNITED America had better plans. If this president wants to align himself with white supremacists, then he's aligning himself with failure. This country still has better plans and will move forward even with a disgusting bigot sitting in the Oval Office.
-
SJWs changed the definition of racism so that blacks can't be racist, while doing racist things. The claim that they don't have the power to do it, while the government, police and universities support them and arrest whites who don't obey the blacks who are oppressing them. That clearly puts blacks into the SJW definition of racism. So by the classic and SJW definitions, blacks are racist.
Much of what you and your fellow leftists call "white supremacy" isn't. It's the same way that you called me a racist for pointing out that a Congressman (without ever mentioning race) told 2 lies; at the time of the conversation. The left scream racist, Nazi and countless other names at their enemies to justify their hatred and abuse of them. Eric Clanton's lawyer tried using the same bullshit tactic in that hallway "press conference". Yvette Felarca is claiming the same thing. Anything they do to those they don't like is justified because their enemy is XYZ.
Abusing white people for something they had no part in is bullshit. I was mugged by a couple of blacks almost 30 years ago. Am I justified in abusing all blacks for that? Of course not. So why is it ok for blacks to abuse whites for something neither were a part of?!
It's funny how only blacks on the left are screaming all this nasty shit at white people. Blacks on the right aren't vilifying white people at every turn. Of course, those are the black people that get the death threats from liberal blacks and SJWs.
-
Blacks on the right aren't vilifying white people at every turn.
That's because those blacks are complicit in uplifting white supremacy. Some black people have their price. You pay them a sum of money and they'll sell their own family members, figuratively and literally. Thankfully, the overwhelming majority of us cannot be bought.
Still, that has nothing to do with our president calling for the deaths of five innocent black men. Once again, no amount of deflection or false equivalency can defend that view. Everything else you said is 100% :ot: so I'm not wasting my time replying to it. Your argument was over the moment you began deflecting and playing various "blame" cards in a discussion that doesn't call for those "blame" cards. Would you like to play yet another one? Which one will you be playing today?
-
Dude, you can't just use the Hillary Card excuse every time her name is mentioned. She literally broke laws, and she's a big part of all this. You think that your cute little way of creating cards cancels out any way for us to make analogies. It's absurd. The only reason you are using those cards is because you literally have no defense for what she did. It's pathetic. You're trying to use it as a way to silence any criticism of the DNC and their corruption, and it isn't going to work.
-
How about Maxine Waters saying over and over again that she wants to impeach Trump, then going on TV saying she never said any such thing, when it is clearly obvious that she did. Is the Maxine Waters card next? Probably. You've got an excuse for everything.
-
Blacks on the right aren't vilifying white people at every turn.
That's because those blacks are complicit in uplifting white supremacy. Some black people have their price. You pay them a sum of money and they'll sell their own family members, figuratively and literally. Thankfully, the overwhelming majority of us cannot be bought.
Still, that has nothing to do with our president calling for the deaths of five innocent black men. Once again, no amount of deflection or false equivalency can defend that view. Everything else you said is 100% :ot: so I'm not wasting my time replying to it. Your argument was over the moment you began deflecting and playing various "blame" cards in a discussion that doesn't call for those "blame" cards. Would you like to play yet another one? Which one will you be playing today?
You are so pathetic.
"If they don't agree with me, they are race traitors and support white supremacists." Fucking hell, the left is delusional.
Does that also apply to whites who help blacks oppress whites? Are they also race traitors who support black supremacists?
It's funny, you and your ilk never want to have a discussion about "those blame cards".
It's also bullshit to say that Tommy Sotomayor, Tom Black, Terrence Williams, aka2kool and countless others support white supremacy. Like me, they hate racists of any color. I bet that's your real problem, they fully admit that blacks are racists and that anti white racism does exist.
-
Blacks on the right aren't vilifying white people at every turn.
That's because those blacks are complicit in uplifting white supremacy. Some black people have their price. You pay them a sum of money and they'll sell their own family members, figuratively and literally. Thankfully, the overwhelming majority of us cannot be bought.
Still, that has nothing to do with our president calling for the deaths of five innocent black men. Once again, no amount of deflection or false equivalency can defend that view. Everything else you said is 100% :ot: so I'm not wasting my time replying to it. Your argument was over the moment you began deflecting and playing various "blame" cards in a discussion that doesn't call for those "blame" cards. Would you like to play yet another one? Which one will you be playing today?
You are so pathetic.
"If they don't agree with me, they are race traitors and support white supremacists." Fucking hell, the left is delusional.
Does that also apply to whites who help blacks oppress whites? Are they also race traitors who support black supremacists?
It's funny, you and your ilk never want to have a discussion about "those blame cards".
It's also bullshit to say that Tommy Sotomayor, Tom Black, Terrence Williams, aka2kool and countless others support white supremacy. Like me, they hate racists of any color. I bet that's your real problem, they fully admit that blacks are racists and that anti white racism does exist.
And you're still severely :ot: This is what I mean about derailment. I did not begin this topic to discuss which white people and black people are this or that. What does any of this have to do with our president currently calling for the deaths of five men who have been exonerated of any wrongdoing involving a case that goes back decades? Just say it's indefensible and either a) move on or b) begin a topic to discuss what YOU want to talk about. Why is constant deflection and derailment perfectly fine for you?
-
Sigh. Points. Pointlessness.
-
I find it fascinating that RoyalCrown has to go back 28 years to find something to comment about.
It's pretty obvious that the 5 punks committed a crime.. HOWEVER.. I am taking a look at this case and have some comments that should make RoyalCrown happy.
If you want, give me the names and ages (and exact birthdates if you can) and I will look up those "fellows" charged in the attacks. I have found some, but not all of their names and ages. I have not yet done background checks on them.REGARDLESS of that…
The death penalty is stupid. It costs far more to execute someone than to keep them in prison for a lifetime. Far too often, people sentenced to death have been later found to be not guilty. (the man I sometimes refer to would have been executed if the country he is in had the death penalty.. a lot of people are going to pay dearly when it is revealed that not only is he not guilty, but the proof that he is not guilty was always there - but ignored. The actual killer was a drag queen that lived directly above the accused man. The drag queen committed suicide a few months after the murder). Given the choice between a lifetime in prison and a quick painless execution.. it would be far more punishing to keep them in prison. Dead people feel no pain or remorse.Some, if not all of the accused Central Park 5 were minors at the time. suggesting that they should be executed is absurd. You don't execute minors. The reasoning part of the human brain is not even fully developed until about 25 years of age.
The victim was not killed.. and executing someone for rape is absurd. At the MOST, they should castrate a rapist - not execute.
It seems that the accused 5 were OVERCHARGED. The woman was raped, but since there were several people involved, it is difficult, if not impossible to PROVE guilt unless you find their DNA up in her vag. They did find DNA of one person whom was not one of the 5 charged. The only way you could prove rape is if they confessed to doing it themselves. Even then, I don't think they were sufficiently represented, nor old enough to be making a confession. Furthermore, even if they did make a legitimate confession, the fact that they made the confession should have resulted in a plea bargain where they would NOT be convicted of rape - otherwise why would anybody confess to anything? Keep in mind that at least 10% of people who confess to rape only do so as a plea bargain to avoid more severe punishment.
There is a big question of what those five were doing at Central Park at 9:30PM. I doubt very much they were there to have a picnic or feed the pigeons.
I think the biggest issue with that case is how the punishment for rape is so severe, and the burden of proof is so low. One simple example of that... a man and woman have sex. The man dumps the woman after sex, or doesn't call her back, or gave her a fake phone number, or didn't pay her, or gets an STD, or finds out the man has a girlfriend / wife, or gets pregnant, etc. The woman who was completely consensual at the time, and perhaps even seduced the man, is then pissed off, and decides to file rape charges. Pretty much no male is safe from that scenario. There have been countless cases in the news of celebrities charged with rape.. and this happens all the time with non-celebrities as well.
I am not shedding any tears for those 5 thugs.. but they were not treated properly by the judicial system. Trump's biggest fault has been how much faith he puts in the police and the judicial system. They should have been charged with lesser crimes, and spent a couple of years in jail. The compensation they eventually got was grossly excessive. Four of them got $7.1 million.. the 5th got $12.2 million.
Here are the names and ages of the 5 thugs.. or I should really say three...
Korey Wise 18 1 traffic citation
Raymond Santana 15 41 theft, 90 prostitution
Yusef Salaam 16 4 robbery, 4 rape
Antron McCray 16 6 traffic citations
Kevin Richardson 16 4 Sodomy, 4 robbery, 5 rape, 4 2nd degree murderKeep in mind that almost all of these charges are BEFORE the Central Park event. (the traffic citations are after)
The jury were probably not OFFICIALLY made aware of the crimes of Santana, Salaam, McCray, and Richardson because they were juveniles at the time.
Of the 5.. two seem to be "clean"
Santana is obviously a thief and prostitute - but otherwise cleanYusef Salaam is a robber who can't keep his dick in his pants..
Kevin Richardson.. that guy truly belongs in prison - it seems he had participated in crimes with Yusef Salaam.The guy with the lavendar scarf is the prostitute.. :bsex:
I hope RoyalCrown is happy now..
Hello! It looks like you're interested in this conversation, but you don't have an account yet.
Getting fed up of having to scroll through the same posts each visit? When you register for an account, you'll always come back to exactly where you were before, and choose to be notified of new replies (either via email, or push notification). You'll also be able to save bookmarks and upvote posts to show your appreciation to other community members.
With your input, this post could be even better 💗
Register Login