Are there any liberals who aren't @#$%&?

[pppucci]

@Frederick:

@pppucci:

I was not implying that if they do it it's OK for us to do it.  I was suggesting we keep our discussions of opinions to public figures because there are obscure individuals on both sides that will say objectionable things that do not represent the group as a whole.

Just because the liberals choose to ignore public figures that conflict with their agenda doesn't make them obscure.

There are a lot of moonbats who don't want to acknowledge that Obama and Hillary ever existed!  How convenient!   They want to restrict all criticisms to those people who are in positions of power.  Since the republicans are in charge of virtually everything now, that is quite convenient for the liberal attacks, isn't it?

Your rantings become more removed from reality by the minute.  Republicans may control the Executive and Congress, they do not hold every elected office.  There are more than enough publicly known  Democratic targets for your ire without discussing obscure figures who have no impact on the country.

[Frederick]

@pppucci:

@Frederick:

@pppucci:

I was not implying that if they do it it's OK for us to do it.  I was suggesting we keep our discussions of opinions to public figures because there are obscure individuals on both sides that will say objectionable things that do not represent the group as a whole.

Just because the liberals choose to ignore public figures that conflict with their agenda doesn't make them obscure.

There are a lot of moonbats who don't want to acknowledge that Obama and Hillary ever existed!  How convenient!   They want to restrict all criticisms to those people who are in positions of power.  Since the republicans are in charge of virtually everything now, that is quite convenient for the liberal attacks, isn't it?

Your rantings become more removed from reality by the minute.  Republicans may control the Executive and Congress, they do not hold every elected office.  There are more than enough publicly known  Democratic targets for your ire without discussing obscure figures who have no impact on the country.

Oh boy.. here's your big chance!  Name one Democrat who is in charge of anything in the Federal government?  The republicans dominate the State Governors also.. but that is a different kettle of fish.
Name me one democrat who is even a chair (chairman) of any committee?  There is ONE.. but you would not dare mention that one.

By the way, you left off the 3rd branch.. the Judicial branch.. which is also controlled by the conservatives.

[pppucci]

You are right.  There are no democratic chairmen of congressional committees since Republicans control both houses.  That does not mean there are no Democratic public figures in Congress.  Go after your favorite targets–Nancy Pelosi, Bernie Sanders and Chuck Schumer, not some obsure NJ Democratic "advisor" and staff member.

As for the Judicial, most analysts would say it is tied 4-4 with Kennedy as the swing vote. The justices, however, do not always rule along ideological lines.

[strangeloop]

@pppucci:

Again, another obscure democrat–a NJ blogger.  From the same article " Several New Jersey Democrats criticized Devine’s comments and said they did not endorse violence. "
Can we limit our discussions to comments made by our members or public figures?

Stop pretending like it's some remote fringe who celebrate his shooting.

Here's prime-time MSNBC host Joy Reid implying that Scalise deserved to be shot: http://www.dailywire.com/news/17649/msnbc-host-suggests-rep-steve-scalise-deserved-be-joseph-curl

Are you going to downplay her relevance, too? A prime time host on one of the big-three cable news?

There are tons of examples of SJWs celebrating, laughing and wishing Scalise died all over the place if you care to open your eyes – they are not fringe.

Look at your tribe, and acknowledge there's a huge violence problem with it, this case being yet another example of endless examples.

[pppucci]

@strangeloop:

@pppucci:

Again, another obscure democrat–a NJ blogger.  From the same article " Several New Jersey Democrats criticized Devine’s comments and said they did not endorse violence. "
Can we limit our discussions to comments made by our members or public figures?

Stop pretending like it's some remote fringe who celebrate his shooting.

Here's prime-time MSNBC host Joy Reid implying that Scalise deserved to be shot: http://www.dailywire.com/news/17649/msnbc-host-suggests-rep-steve-scalise-deserved-be-joseph-curl

Are you going to downplay her relevance, too? A prime time host on one of the big-three cable news?

There are tons of examples of SJWs celebrating, laughing and wishing Scalise died all over the place if you care to open your eyes – they are not fringe.

Look at your tribe, and acknowledge there's a huge violence problem with it, this case being yet another example of endless examples.

This is what she said,

“_t’s a delicate thing because everybody is wishing the congressman well and hoping that he recovers, but Steve Scalise has a history that we’ve all been forced to sort of ignore on race,” Reid said. “He did come to leadership after some controversy over attending a white nationalist event, which he says he didn’t know what it was.

He also co-sponsored a bill to amend the Constitution to define marriage as between a man and a woman. He voted for the House healthcare bill, which as you said would gut health care for millions of people, including three million children, and he co-sponsored a bill to repeal the ban on semi-automatic weapons.

Because he is in jeopardy and everybody is pulling for him, are we required in a moral sense to put that aside at the moment?”
Not exactly saying he got what he deserved.  She simply states that his condition prevents people from criticizing his POLICIES._

[jojojojo3]

@Frederick:

This democratic doofus  wishes that the republican representative shot on a baseball field last week had been killed.
http://www.msn.com/en-us/news/us/caught-on-tape-dem-official-says-hes-glad-scalise-got-shot/ar-BBD5kFE?li=BBmkt5R&ocid=spartanntp

yes, but they're killed by the regressive left of today by being called a racist.

they're praising the death of someone who died because they need that "trump is bad" clickbait. Nevermind that let's accept muslims who love to talk Taqiya and have no shame in wanting to kill us.

[Frederick]

@pppucci:

@strangeloop:

@pppucci:

Again, another obscure democrat–a NJ blogger.  From the same article " Several New Jersey Democrats criticized Devine’s comments and said they did not endorse violence. "
Can we limit our discussions to comments made by our members or public figures?

Stop pretending like it's some remote fringe who celebrate his shooting.

Here's prime-time MSNBC host Joy Reid implying that Scalise deserved to be shot: http://www.dailywire.com/news/17649/msnbc-host-suggests-rep-steve-scalise-deserved-be-joseph-curl

Are you going to downplay her relevance, too? A prime time host on one of the big-three cable news?

There are tons of examples of SJWs celebrating, laughing and wishing Scalise died all over the place if you care to open your eyes – they are not fringe.

Look at your tribe, and acknowledge there's a huge violence problem with it, this case being yet another example of endless examples.

This is what she said,

“_t’s a delicate thing because everybody is wishing the congressman well and hoping that he recovers, but Steve Scalise has a history that we’ve all been forced to sort of ignore on race,” Reid said. “He did come to leadership after some controversy over attending a white nationalist event, which he says he didn’t know what it was.

He also co-sponsored a bill to amend the Constitution to define marriage as between a man and a woman. He voted for the House healthcare bill, which as you said would gut health care for millions of people, including three million children, and he co-sponsored a bill to repeal the ban on semi-automatic weapons.

Because he is in jeopardy and everybody is pulling for him, are we required in a moral sense to put that aside at the moment?”
Not exactly saying he got what he deserved.  She simply states that his condition prevents people from criticizing his POLICIES.

Nice try.. but you are WRONG!   If someone wanted to criticize the policies of Scalise, then they should have been doing it BEFORE he got shot.   The criticisms are only being made public AFTER he got shot.. as if his policies are any justification to attempt to kill as many people at that baseball game as possible, and shooting 4 of them.  _

[pppucci]

There was more than enough criticism of Scalise before he was shot.  In no way do the comments I quoted justify the attack.  She is simply pointing out that it is difficult to criticize a wounded man.

[sutieday]

Conservatives/Alt-right love to lower the reputation of their opponents, especially on this board.

[Frederick]

@sutieday:

Conservatives/Alt-right love to lower the reputation of their opponents, especially on this board.

That is not necessary.  The moonbats are self-destructive and do it to themselves.

[raphjd]

@sutieday:

Conservatives/Alt-right love to lower the reputation of their opponents, especially on this board.

So says the person that made it his mission to down vote everything his enemies said, no matter what it was.