Sponsors of terror ‘falling victim to evil they promote’ ‒ Trump on Tehran attak
-
The White House has sent condolences to Iran after at least 12 people were killed in terrorist bomb and gun attacks in Tehran, but then lectured that “states that sponsor terrorism risk falling victim to the evil they promote.”
“We grieve and pray for the innocent victims of the terrorist attacks in Iran, and for the Iranian people, who are going through such challenging times,” the White House said in a statement in response to the Tuesday attacks. “We underscore that states that sponsor terrorism risk falling victim to the evil they promote.”
Oh the irony! Trump's support of Saudi Wahhabism by his $100+ billion arms deal is what is fueling terrorism! Trump is in bed with zionist/puppet-masters. Iran is fighting ISIS!
How will Trumpkins defend him?
https://www.rt.com/usa/391291-trump-white-house-tehran-terrorist-attacks/
I seriously don't get how you're turning this into an attack on Trump. Not much to do with it.
Also, doing a service to bump threads past the low effort spam. Bump
-
Are you stupid enough to believe Hillary or Bernie would have done any different?
So what is the problem with Trump doing it? Your lord and saviour did it for the last 8 years and regardless who is President, it will always happen.
So stop with the partisan bullshit.
-
They probably would have done the same, doesn't make it any better.
-
Saudi Arabia is a terrorist sponsoring state.
-
"Your lord and saviour did it for the last 8 years and regardless who is President, it will always happen." Um, last time I checked Jesus Christ was not the president.
-
Seeing everyone who does not agree with you as having the same views is being bigoted.
"bigoted" lol
At least you are partially being honest.
Obama is the lord and saviour of liberal.
It's funny how liberals weren't really that bothered when Obama was doing deals with Saudi, but lose their rags because Trump is.
-
-
Are you stupid enough to believe Hillary or Bernie would have done any different?
So what is the problem with Trump doing it? Your lord and saviour did it for the last 8 years and regardless who is President, it will always happen.
So stop with the partisan bullshit.
-
They probably would have done the same, doesn't make it any better.
-
Saudi Arabia is a terrorist sponsoring state.
-
"Your lord and saviour did it for the last 8 years and regardless who is President, it will always happen." Um, last time I checked Jesus Christ was not the president.
-
Seeing everyone who does not agree with you as having the same views is being bigoted.
"bigoted" lol
At least you are partially being honest.
Obama is the lord and saviour of liberal.
It's funny how liberals weren't really that bothered when Obama was doing deals with Saudi, but lose their rags because Trump is.
I wouldn't even put Obama at the level of "liberal". I think he actually believed he was some muslim descendant of Mohammad.. given the name "Barack" which is the name of Mohammad's evil winged black horse. He felt it was his destiny to bring the USA down and elevate muslims & terrorists. Or am I being too harsh?
![😕](https://community.gaytor.rent/assets/plugins/nodebb-plugin-emoji/emoji/apple/1f615.png?v=57695cee877 ":-\")
-
-
Sad to see the typical purveyors of anti-Muslim/anti-liberal bigotry have invested this post. No discussion between the different ideologies followed by Saudi Arabia (Sunni) and Iran (Shia), and why they hate one another.
I guess its easier to be bigoted than to think critically.
-
Sad to see the typical purveyors of anti-Muslim/anti-liberal bigotry have invested this post. No discussion between the different ideologies followed by Saudi Arabia (Sunni) and Iran (Shia), and why they hate one another.
I guess its easier to be bigoted than to think critically.
Your opening post declared your partisan view of the topic.
You didn't want to talk about anything other than Trump.
-
Sad to see the typical purveyors of anti-Muslim/anti-liberal bigotry have invested this post. No discussion between the different ideologies followed by Saudi Arabia (Sunni) and Iran (Shia), and why they hate one another.
I guess its easier to be bigoted than to think critically.
Your opening post declared your partisan view of the topic.
You didn't want to talk about anything other than Trump.
It's OK when liberals do it.
-
Sad to see the typical purveyors of anti-Muslim/anti-liberal bigotry have invested this post. No discussion between the different ideologies followed by Saudi Arabia (Sunni) and Iran (Shia), and why they hate one another.
I guess its easier to be bigoted than to think critically.
Your opening post declared your partisan view of the topic.
You didn't want to talk about anything other than Trump.
How so? Opening a topic generally means you discuss that topic.
I'm talking about the comment made by the Trump WH towards this terrorist attack, not being partisan, just critical of it.
On a side note: It is ironic how those on the right say they support free speech, but then whine about downvotes and people opposing their views.
-
How so? Opening a topic generally means you discuss that topic.
I'm talking about the comment made by the Trump WH towards this terrorist attack, not being partisan, just critical of it.
It's called being Intellectually Honest.
What you are doing is called Intellectual Dishonesty. It is blatantly obvious to literally everyone that you wouldn't criticize any other democratic president in the same way, because, well you haven't. Let's see if this post is something anyone could see you writing:
Oh the irony! Barack's support of Saudi Wahhabism by his $115 billion+ billion arms deal is what is fueling terrorism! Iran is fighting ISIS!
How will Libtards defend him?
No, of course not, you didn't write that post at the time, and you would never write that post about Hillary either.
Because, let's face it:
-
How so? Opening a topic generally means you discuss that topic.
I'm talking about the comment made by the Trump WH towards this terrorist attack, not being partisan, just critical of it.
It's called being Intellectually Honest.
What you are doing is called Intellectual Dishonesty. It is blatantly obvious to literally everyone that you wouldn't criticize any other democratic president in the same way, because, well you haven't. Let's see if this post is something anyone could see you writing:
Oh the irony! Barack's support of Saudi Wahhabism by his $115 billion+ billion arms deal is what is fueling terrorism! Iran is fighting ISIS!
How will Libtards defend him?
No, of course not, you didn't write that post at the time, and you would never write that post about Hillary either.
Because, let's face it:
Your post is nonsense, I'm critical of the president and regardless of the party they belong to. I know Obama's admin was working towards the Saudi deal, but Trump was the one who signed it.
I hope that Congress can overrule him with the help of good republicans like Sen. Rand Paul.
-
Your post is nonsense, I'm critical of the president and regardless of the party they belong to. I know Obama's admin was working towards the Saudi deal, but Trump was the one who signed it.
Obama didn't just propose a deal, he actively sold weapons to Saudi Arabia throughout his presidency.
Ah, so maybe you were being truthful about criticizing regardless of party, but were just ill informed? Maybe you would've criticized Obama too, if you knew he also sold billions of dollars to SA? Yes/no?
-
"Obama’s Administration Sold More Weapons Than Any Other Since World War II"
Are you going to criticize Obama now that you know?
-
Your post is nonsense, I'm critical of the president and regardless of the party they belong to. I know Obama's admin was working towards the Saudi deal, but Trump was the one who signed it.
Obama didn't just propose a deal, he actively sold weapons to Saudi Arabia throughout his presidency.
Ah, so maybe you were being truthful about criticizing regardless of party, but were just ill informed? Maybe you would've criticized Obama too, if you knew he also sold billions of dollars to SA? Yes/no?
Right now, I'm criticizing Trump because of his Saudi deal. I'm not gonna pivot because it suits your narrative. Trump lied when he said he wasn't a puppet, he is clearly a Saudi puppet.
-
"Obama’s Administration Sold More Weapons Than Any Other Since World War II"
Are you going to criticize Obama now that you know?
You're only argument is that what Trump is doing is okay because Obama did it, and no its not.
Your argument is just tu quoque, trying to deflect from criticism of your guy (#45) and criticize someone else.
-
Oh dear lord you doubled down. Obama came up with the deal, Obama sold weapons to them throughout his presidency. But you can only criticize Trump?
lol hypocrisy on full display here folks. Sad!
-
I'll tell you what, make a new post in a separate topic criticizing Obama for his dealings with Saudia Arabia and people will take you seriously.
Right now, you have no credibility for your intellectual dishonesty and double standards.
-
I used to be a Trump shill like yourself @strangeloop (you can check my posts months ago), but I woke up after Tomahawk Trump and the Saudi deal.
-
I used to be a Trump shill like yourself @strangeloop (you can check my posts months ago), but I woke up after Tomahawk Trump and the Saudi deal.
Who says I like Trump? You think I do but you don't know that, you're just assuming. Calling out your intellectual dishonesty doesn't mean I think selling weapons to SA is a good thing.
-
I used to be a Trump shill like yourself @strangeloop (you can check my posts months ago), but I woke up after Tomahawk Trump and the Saudi deal.
Who says I like Trump? You think I do but you don't know that, you're just assuming. Calling out your intellectual dishonesty doesn't mean I think selling weapons to SA is a good thing.
Exactly, who says I like Obama? Numerous times have I said his Saudi support was bad as well.
-
Exactly, who says I like Obama? Numerous times have I said his Saudi support was bad as well.
Okay, where have you said that? Because all I see in this thread is your refusal to do so. All I see is that you're making this about attacking Trump/Trump supporters, rather than talking about the actual issue, which isn't necessarily a problem with any single administration.
-
Exactly, who says I like Obama? Numerous times have I said his Saudi support was bad as well.
rather than talking about the actual issue, which isn't necessarily a problem with any single administration.
I'm blaming the Trump administration for giving money to Saudi Arabia and the recent terror attacks that have occured afterwards in the UK, and Iran.
You have yet to give anything critical of the Trump admin and instead just pivot to Obama, who is not currently the president.
Hello! It looks like you're interested in this conversation, but you don't have an account yet.
Getting fed up of having to scroll through the same posts each visit? When you register for an account, you'll always come back to exactly where you were before, and choose to be notified of new replies (either via email, or push notification). You'll also be able to save bookmarks and upvote posts to show your appreciation to other community members.
With your input, this post could be even better 💗
Register Login