• Categories
    • Recent
    • Tags
    • Popular
    • Users
    • Groups
    • Torrents
    • Login

    TEXAS: State House Votes To Allow Religious Adoption Agencies To Turn Away Gays

    Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved Politics & Debate
    23 Posts 8 Posters 5.7k Views 1 Watching
    Loading More Posts
    • Oldest to Newest
    • Newest to Oldest
    • Most Votes
    Reply
    • Reply as topic
    Log in to reply
    This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
    • D Offline
      Drwas
      last edited by

      The key word you brushed over is "FAITH" based adoption agencies.  One of the protections of religion is that they can do pretty much anything they want - because of the separation of church and state.  I don't agree with that, but it is the law.  I don't think that most if any of the activities of churches should be tax exempt.. but that is also the way the laws work.

      Then they deserve to lose their tax-exempt status. If you're taking my tax dollars, you're not allowed to exclude. Period.

      1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
      • V Offline
        viscous
        last edited by

        @Frederick:

        One of the protections of religion is that they can do pretty much anything they want - because of the separation of church and state.

        Frederick pulled this one right out of thin air, because separation of church and state does not mean religious institutions can "do pretty much anything they want." Second, this law also applies to religious-based agencies that get state funding. It would also let agencies discriminate against Jews and Muslims, for that matter, as well as LGBT people.

        1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
        • S Offline
          semurg30
          last edited by

          If the organization is faith based I don't have a problem with it.

          If you're gay and you want a baby go to a non faith based adoption agency.

          1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
          • D Offline
            Drwas
            last edited by

            If you're gay and you want a baby go to a non faith based adoption agency.

            Longing for the days of separate drinking fountains too?

            1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
            • S Offline
              semurg30
              last edited by

              @Drwas:

              If you're gay and you want a baby go to a non faith based adoption agency.

              Longing for the days of separate drinking fountains too?

              Oh a sarcastic remark. How quaint.

              The religious shouldn't be FORCED to accept us. That ensures they won't accept us. They'll dig their heels in deeper.

              Their religion says we're in the wrong. So yeah separation in this case IS warranted. Get your babies and your gay wedding cakes from people who are open to dealing with you. Forcing shit like this is why we have the scumbag president we have. The homophobes and religious right dug their heels in deeper as a reaction to a president with liberal policies. The more we force our agenda the more resistance we're going to encounter.

              1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
              • raphjdR Offline
                raphjd Forum Administrator
                last edited by

                Second, this law also applies to religious-based agencies that get state funding. It would also let agencies discriminate against Jews and Muslims, for that matter, as well as LGBT people.

                It would allow jewish and muslim agencies to turn away those they don't like too.  So no discrimination there.

                1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                • V Offline
                  viscous
                  last edited by

                  @raphjd:

                  Second, this law also applies to religious-based agencies that get state funding. It would also let agencies discriminate against Jews and Muslims, for that matter, as well as LGBT people.

                  It would allow jewish and muslim agencies to turn away those they don't like too.   So no discrimination there.

                  Well, no, based on what you just said, this law would allow all kinds of "discrimination there." But thanks for showing your true colors on this.

                  1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                  • raphjdR Offline
                    raphjd Forum Administrator
                    last edited by

                    LOL, you were the one trying to make it into a "christians can discriminate against everyone" type issue and I pointed out that the law was not specific to christians.    It allows ALL religions to discriminate against those they don't like.

                    Despite your lame attempt to label me as something or other,  I don't like laws like this based on equality.  I can't discriminate against believers (of any faith) but they can discriminate against me.

                    I also support the concept of "separation of church and state" and that includes NOT giving state funds to religious groups for any reason.

                    We see through your thinly veiled attempt to claim "muslims will be victimized" in that.  Of course muslims hate gays more than most other groups.

                    1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                    • D Offline
                      dosido3232
                      last edited by

                      Absolutely agree - if a private, faith-based agency is not going to provide equal access to services like a public, non-faith-based one, the public support of tax exemption should be removed.

                      1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                      • D Offline
                        Dene
                        last edited by

                        @raphjd:

                        LOL, you were the one trying to make it into a "christians can discriminate against everyone" type issue and I pointed out that the law was not specific to christians.    It allows ALL religions to discriminate against those they don't like.

                        Despite your lame attempt to label me as something or other,  I don't like laws like this based on equality.   I can't discriminate against believers (of any faith) but they can discriminate against me.

                        I also support the concept of "separation of church and state" and that includes NOT giving state funds to religious groups for any reason.

                        We see through your thinly veiled attempt to claim "muslims will be victimized" in that.   Of course muslims hate gays more than most other groups.

                        I never understood that.. the government funding religion, either directly or through tax exemption. It kinda defeats the whole "separation of church and state" in my opinion.

                        1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                        • FrederickF Offline
                          Frederick
                          last edited by

                          @Drwas:

                          The key word you brushed over is "FAITH" based adoption agencies.  One of the protections of religion is that they can do pretty much anything they want - because of the separation of church and state.  I don't agree with that, but it is the law.   I don't think that most if any of the activities of churches should be tax exempt.. but that is also the way the laws work.

                          Then they deserve to lose their tax-exempt status. If you're taking my tax dollars, you're not allowed to exclude. Period.

                          OMG!  We agree on something!    :cheers:

                          Picture removed by admin

                          1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                          • FrederickF Offline
                            Frederick
                            last edited by

                            @viscous:

                            @Frederick:

                            One of the protections of religion is that they can do pretty much anything they want - because of the separation of church and state.

                            Frederick pulled this one right out of thin air, because separation of church and state does not mean religious institutions can "do pretty much anything they want." Second, this law also applies to religious-based agencies that get state funding. It would also let agencies discriminate against Jews and Muslims, for that matter, as well as LGBT people.

                            As a matter of fact.. separation of church and state DOES mean the churches can do pretty much anything they want.  This is how cults become some a problem such as with David Koresh, Jim Jones, Warren Jeffs, and David Miscavige.

                            Koresh was having incestuous sex with minors… as was Jeffs.. and Miscavige's wife has not been seen nor heard of at all since 2006 when she defied him.  (By the way.. I didn't know this until recently, but Miscavige is only 5 foot 1!  That's 3 inches shorter than Tom Cruise!)

                            Picture removed by admin

                            1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                            • V Offline
                              viscous
                              last edited by

                              @Frederick:

                              As a matter of fact.. separation of church and state DOES mean the churches can do pretty much anything they want.  This is how cults become some a problem such as with David Koresh, Jim Jones, Warren Jeffs, and David Miscavige.

                              Koresh was having incestuous sex with minors… as was Jeffs.. and Miscavige's wife has not been seen nor heard of at all since 2006 when she defied him.   (By the way.. I didn't know this until recently, but Miscavige is only 5 foot 1!  That's 3 inches shorter than Tom Cruise!)

                              But David Koresh and Warren Jeffs were shut down for this, among other things, and Jim Jones was being investigated and saw the end when he had his meltdown. I don't think religious organizations should be tax exempt either, but you are tripping over your own argument.

                              1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                              • FrederickF Offline
                                Frederick
                                last edited by

                                @viscous:

                                @Frederick:

                                As a matter of fact.. separation of church and state DOES mean the churches can do pretty much anything they want.  This is how cults become some a problem such as with David Koresh, Jim Jones, Warren Jeffs, and David Miscavige.

                                Koresh was having incestuous sex with minors… as was Jeffs.. and Miscavige's wife has not been seen nor heard of at all since 2006 when she defied him.   (By the way.. I didn't know this until recently, but Miscavige is only 5 foot 1!  That's 3 inches shorter than Tom Cruise!)

                                But David Koresh and Warren Jeffs were shut down for this, among other things, and Jim Jones was being investigated and saw the end when he had his meltdown. I don't think religious organizations should be tax exempt either, but you are tripping over your own argument.

                                Mmm..  I was talking about the protections given religious groups that allow them to do just about anything they want.
                                Koresh nor Jeffs (nor Jones) were shut down.  Koresh and Jones went out in an abrupt orgy of mass suicides / homicides. 
                                They didn't shut Jeffs down at all.  They put him in jail, but the Fundamentalist Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-Day Saints continues to operate.. in fact Jeffs somewhat controls it from prison.  The Fundamentalist Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-Day Saints are a split division from the Mormons, because the Mormons gave up polygamy, whereas the FCLDS did not.. and STILL practice polygamy.  The bible is loaded with polygamy and a ton of other bullshit.  It's bad enough being tied down with one woman, but several?  That is hell on earth!
                                Maybe that is what hell is all about.. those Muslims dying and getting 72 virgins after death, who remain virgins after death, and do nothing but nag the hell out of the men and grow old and haggard.

                                As for adoption.  People like Koresh and Jeffs don't need to adopt.  They just have babies with their multiple wives, and even with their own daughters.

                                Picture removed by admin

                                1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                                • A Offline
                                  amicusets
                                  last edited by

                                  Some of you all need to go back to school or quit getting your civics lessons from tweets and soundbites.

                                  "Separation" of church and State are nowhere to be found in the Constitution. The first amendment is:
                                  Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press, or the right of the people peaceably to assemble and to petition the Government for a redress of grievances.

                                  By telling a FAITH-based agency who and how they have to serve the government would be encroaching on the free exercise of religion. This really affects nobody, except some gay couple that wanders down to their local FAITH-based adoption agency and demands to be served by them. There are other ways to adopt.

                                  1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                                  • A Offline
                                    amicusets
                                    last edited by

                                    @viscous:

                                    But David Koresh and Warren Jeffs were shut down for this, among other things, and Jim Jones was being investigated and saw the end when he had his meltdown. I don't think religious organizations should be tax exempt either, but you are tripping over your own argument.

                                    Koresh was brought down by the ATF on alleged weapons violations. Any accusation of child rape have never been even close to substantiated and are refuted by survivors of the Waco siege.

                                    Jim Jones was brought down by his own drug addiction which fueled his paranoia and his coterie believed he was the Christ. He was being investigated for Social Security fraud and civil rights abuses of his elderly followers.

                                    Jeffs is imprisoned and was taken down for child rape.

                                    1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                                    • raphjdR Offline
                                      raphjd Forum Administrator
                                      last edited by

                                      The separation of church and state ends when tax dollars are given to perform actions for the state.

                                      1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                                      • A Offline
                                        amicusets
                                        last edited by

                                        @raphjd:

                                        The separation of church and state ends when tax dollars are given to perform actions for the state.

                                        There is no codified separation. There is the no state establishment of a church. Giving money to a private company for a service is no different than giving money to a church for the same service.

                                        1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                                        • FrederickF Offline
                                          Frederick
                                          last edited by

                                          @amicusets:

                                          @raphjd:

                                          The separation of church and state ends when tax dollars are given to perform actions for the state.

                                          There is no codified separation. There is the no state establishment of a church. Giving money to a private company for a service is no different than giving money to a church for the same service.

                                          There is a world of difference.  A private company is liable in many ways for services.  A church is pretty much exempt from any liability.  Ever hear of priests molesting children?

                                          Picture removed by admin

                                          1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                                          • raphjdR Offline
                                            raphjd Forum Administrator
                                            last edited by

                                            The difference is, a private business has to obey the laws of the land, while religious groups get to ignore them to suit their beliefs.

                                            My dad used my inheritance to start a homeless shelter for men.   He got no tax money for it, but let's assume he did.

                                            He could not discriminate in who he lets in and who he hires, but a religious homeless shelter can discriminate in who they let in and who they hire.   My dad couldn't force people to pray and attend church services, but a religious one can.

                                            ++++

                                            Correct, there is no codified separation.  HOWEVER, it is clearly established in law through court rulings.

                                            1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0

                                            Hello! It looks like you're interested in this conversation, but you don't have an account yet.

                                            Getting fed up of having to scroll through the same posts each visit? When you register for an account, you'll always come back to exactly where you were before, and choose to be notified of new replies (either via email, or push notification). You'll also be able to save bookmarks and upvote posts to show your appreciation to other community members.

                                            With your input, this post could be even better 💗

                                            Register Login
                                            • 1
                                            • 2
                                            • 1 / 2
                                            • First post
                                              Last post