Which type of Porn turns you on the most?

[fuckall]

oh, and in general, bear and midget porn

[jazuko]

Young top and older bottom especially if theres a size difference

[Minerboh80]

[yusufzhagaUS]

suit and uniform fetish  :cheesy2:

[ab1963]

good looking cleanshaven hairy hunks

[Minerboh80]

Shower sex scenes are also pretty hot

[warpaint]

Well if I had a choice of seeing guys fuck with condom or without I would take the latter.
Though I like the moment of putting the condom on. They mostly skip that in porn.

[lucasbraga]

Bareback sex!

[AstroJack]

High quality/Definition certainly helps but on a more sexual/turn-on note:

• Bareback
• Big Cocks with even bigger loads
• A bit of "forceful"/"Dom" behaviour & "Rough Play" is always good
• Above all, Hot Guys

[pornofan]

jazuko: Young top and older bottom especially if theres a size difference

Right. I love seeing youth in the prime of their power. But that's a personal preference. So is wanting
the man to have all the body hair puberty provided.

What surprises me constantly is the number of porn videos that don't pay attention to the Important Stuff.

I like seeing the players in street clothes, watching them become aroused (perhaps while still dressed).
When they fuck, we should see the dick enter. More important, we should see the top ejaculate inside without
cuts or fades so there is no room for cheating or chicanery from the camera or editing. We watch the hard,
wet dick come out, and then the fresh juice drains out to verify that the orgasmic bodywork was not faked.

Felching is nice. Feeding the cum to the bottom to slurp is nice. What is important is that we see the faces at
the critical moment, or at least just after. If there is barebacking, using the first load as lube for a prompt
repeat is outstanding. Meanwhile, the bottom cumming hands-free because the top is fucking the sperm right out
of him. Very nice.

Maybe I make this sound like purely personal interests, but I believe a fucker should be able to complete his work
without interruption. I believe the bottom should cum, too. And we should get to look at the freshly deposited cream.
That does not mean pulling out for some squirting and then pushing the dick back in; it means going for the gold
though hell should bar the way.

If a condom is involved, by all means let us see it being put on. And after the internal cum shot, once the protected
dick is removed, let's see the end sagging heavily with its contents. Then it can be unloaded, shared, slurped, or
whatever.

If there the ejaculation is from a blowjob, let's not have a facial, but a deposit as deep and hard as possible. Let's
have the cocksucker swallow his reward for a job well done. We can see what fills his mouth or view the soaked
penis upon withdrawal. And we should see the faces and bodies immediately post coitus.

Strait porn often focuses on the woman for some reason (go figure, huh?) which means we may never see the dick
come out. May never see the amount and quality of the load. May never even look at the guy again because who cares
about him? All they want is the girl…. Grrr.

Esp. with facials, whatever amount does not land in the mouth usually just makes a mess and there is no evidence the
cocksucker actually wants to swallow, taste, savor, or otherwise enjoy the boiling fresh cum newly erupted. Instead,
we often get someone with clenched eyes drearily submitting to a drenching and hoping not a drop gets beyond the lips.
This is not how sex is supposed to be.

I want to see people having a good time, holding nothing back, pleasuring each other, and I want to see their satisfaction
afterwards. The convulsions of some Marines being blown for pay near Camp Pendleton suggests some of them have never
had anything close to that powerful an experience before. In such cases, the look of utterly drained, knocked out, tension-free
bliss on their relaxed post-O faces is wonderful.

That little smirk of accomplishment, the thumb's up validation of having successfully done their breeding thing for the camera,
the little laugh that sometimes follows as the final reservation and tension is released and the forceful quality of the man's
performance is acknowledged. Those followups to the ejaculation itself can be memorable and incentivizing.

I don't see why the climax is often faked or fudged or compromised by the director getting in the way of the natural drive
toward glory, that's all. The rest of my remarks are mere commentary.

It is probably too much to ask that there be more than one camera, more than one angle or point of view. Apparently it is not
always even obvious that we should see the dick sliding in and out, that the camera be held steady, and that there be enough
light that we can tell what is going on. Simple, minimal evidences of filmmaking competence. Considering the seemingly endless
array of hunky young Marines beating off, getting sucked, and even fucking Bobby and others, it is a damn tragedy that the
lighting and focus and camerawork are so often not even up to the level of being subpar.

If those technical things are handled correctly and the people are attractive, horned up and ready to complete their mission
enthusiastically with plenty of passion, all is well. But if some dude pulls out, whisks off the condom, and then wanks for ten
minutes while his partner nods off in bored frustration, resigned to put up with the situation as the cameraman or editor has
repeated fades and cuts to hide the very long limp time involved, that's not hot. Is it?

Oh. And no cockring!

[matduan]

verbal daddy ;D

[whoreduck]

Just bareback

[fuckall]

Bareback

[glenatia]

Bondage

[barbear]

the best to reach that stadium with your partner when you can do it bareback

[foreco]

bareback

[Minerboh80]

Daddy/son with seduction involved. Especially when the son does the seduction… it makes me steel hard!

[bimarriedguy]

Anonymous bareback sex….I love watching a cock pulsate as it pumps cum deep inside the bottom

[sonderposten]

A

[shririmps]

B.  Condom/Safe Sex.