The New Picture Browser - Feedback
-
I wonder if it would be possible to set the search feature like the old browse feature where it will only show the catigories that are chosen in a member's preferences.
it is exactly like this now. your pre-selected categories work on both, the new browse with thumbnails or in the old browse (now search)
-
a option to add a next page after loading so many images either a hard set limit or a profile option that you can set your own limit
the page just goes for ever takes a crap ton of memory and page slows down after about 600megs used at 750 it was unusablein random mode not a problem, but agrree, not in sort by latest torrent.
i guess a button to clear the browser and continue loading would work..give it some time
-
now it appears a black "Clear browser" on the left bottom of the page when you scroll.. you can remove all pics and continue browsing to save memory and so browsers from collapse :blind:
-
Too much going on, too much clutter and repeated pics, agreeing with adventurous, keep it one or two large pics and the name of the torrent and organized please…
-
The First image I clicked on took me to the video, but the comments state that none of the 3 images are anything to do with the video. Had I known the comments I wouldn't have bothered clicking the images. Is this going to be monitored or some option to exclude these videos with misleading images?
I agree with a previous comment that the number of images needs to be limited, and I think making them display at a universal size would make the overall outlay more uniform and easier to follow. Thumbnail sheets are useless, these are often too small to appreciate images at the best of times but on this it's just a waste of space (memory)
I view the old list and go by the titles first, then check the images (hover over so I see all related images at 1 go) along with the description and comments. The image page doesn't let you know where one lots finishes and the next starts, so you could think something is in a torrent when it's not unless you check every image.
The overall concept is nice, but still needs a lot of work I think, so WELL DONE, but keep improving it.
I do hope that the original will not be removed, as for now I don't see me switching.
-
I don't want to browse by image. Seeing titles is better.
-
dont worry guys, it was not intended to have this new browse way as a replacement - more like a new way of browsing beside the regular way
-
Please don't waste any more time on this pic browse thing. It sucks.
-
It's a nice feature, since we still have the "regular" search option, the problem is that some people think that it was replaced.
I'll use it specially when I'm too lazy to roll over the titles to see pics
-
SOOOOOOO Happy you kept the old option in Search.
I'm on Windows 2000 with an old celeron computer with 260 K ram.
it took a few seconds and my system crashed. I had to reboot!
did that 3 times and 3 times crashed.
thanks
-
SOOOOOOO Happy you kept the old option in Search.
I'm on Windows 2000 with an old celeron computer with 260 K ram.
it took a few seconds and my system crashed. I had to reboot!
did that 3 times and 3 times crashed.
thanks
there is no reason for us to drop the old browse page, but anyhow we do live in 2k14 - you cannot blame a website for not running on such a crappy system. sorry
-
Please don't waste any more time on this pic browse thing. It sucks.
please avoid stupid no-brain comments like that or the database might get a hiccup and remove you like this guy
-
It's a nice feature, since we still have the "regular" search option, the problem is that some people think that it was replaced.
I'll use it specially when I'm too lazy to roll over the titles to see pics
instead of reading people start crying. what a stupid community
-
since i'm lazy when i'm tired, and i'm tired A LOT, i'll be using this…A LOT.
found some stuff already. maybe an option in the profile to change the default way search currently works?
default is browse so people who don't read this thread (even if they look at it -lol) won't cry about pic browser, option is to restore search to it's default behavior.
checked categories are saved, but not active if the setting is to default (old) search version. -
It's a nice feature, since we still have the "regular" search option, the problem is that some people think that it was replaced.
I'll use it specially when I'm too lazy to roll over the titles to see pics
instead of reading people start crying. what a stupid community
What a stupid administrator….you ask for feedback and when its negative you accuse people of stupidity??? :crazy2:
even i got accused of being in c64 era...not that im complaining, c64 is still the best thing. -
since i'm lazy when i'm tired, and i'm tired A LOT, i'll be using this…A LOT.
found some stuff already. maybe an option in the profile to change the default way search currently works?
default is browse so people who don't read this thread (even if they look at it -lol) won't cry about pic browser, option is to restore search to it's default behavior.
checked categories are saved, but not active if the setting is to default (old) search version.why? people can get aware of it, and if they not like it or need to search something switch over to the old way while clicking on "search"
before "search" and "browse" lead to the same script.
one thing is still different: search opened the browse page with no pre-selected categories from profile, while browse took them from users profile.
-
It's a nice feature, since we still have the "regular" search option, the problem is that some people think that it was replaced.
I'll use it specially when I'm too lazy to roll over the titles to see pics
instead of reading people start crying. what a stupid community
What a stupid administrator….you ask for feedback and when its negative you accuse people of stupidity??? :crazy2:
even i got accused of being in c64 era...not that im complaining, c64 is still the best thing.so you think:
Please don't waste any more time on this pic browse thing. It sucks.
is "feedback" at all ? i was refering to this
btw. popper was asking.. not me
-
Some of the descriptions fall off the side of the page. Specifically, if you hover over an image in the second or third column on the left-hand side.
I've attached an image. Hope it helps.
-
Some of the descriptions fall off the side of the page. Specifically, if you hover over an image in the second or third column on the left-hand side.
thx for reporting… im trying to fix this quite a while now.. im on it
-
even i got accused of being in c64 era…not that im complaining, c64 is still the best thing.
nothing to say against this. i started programming on a c64
but please do not expect me to make the site work on it or on a win2k with 256mb memory :blownose:
Hello! It looks like you're interested in this conversation, but you don't have an account yet.
Getting fed up of having to scroll through the same posts each visit? When you register for an account, you'll always come back to exactly where you were before, and choose to be notified of new replies (either via email, or push notification). You'll also be able to save bookmarks and upvote posts to show your appreciation to other community members.
With your input, this post could be even better 💗
Register Login