For example, on the FB side of things, I have reported a number of posts containing very sexually explicit materials for violating the community standards (even since long before AI took over), and as long as it's hetero content, I have had to report the content at least a couple dozen times before they find it violated the standards. I'm not even talking a little nudity that could reasonably be argued as art... I'm talking things like a video clip of straight up hardcore fucking.

By the same token, I've seen things like pictures that show a little bulge, but are otherwise extremely tame by comparison get reported all of ONCE, and they get taken down IMMEDIATELY. For some reason, it seems that if it's hetero, their restrictions are rather relaxed and lacking, but the moment the content is in any way even remotely homoerotic (such as suggestive but otherwise appropriate images of only a male), the content gets stricken quickly without a second thought.

It just baffles my mind how we can see images, videos, etc of a guy and a girl engaging in some sort of sexually explicit activity, and it is deemed to be perfectly fine, and we can even see images or videos that involve only women, and it seems to be perfectly fine, but the moment the image or video depicts only a guy, or it depicts a guy and another guy, it immediately gets shut down as violating their community standards.

Also, the degree of sexuality to the image seems to be wildly inconsistent between straight and gay (especially men only) content. For example, if it's a video of a guy and a girl in the woods where the girl is bent over with her hands against a tree getting raw dogged like no tomorrow, it's perfectly ok and needed to be reported for sexual activity more than two dozen times before finally getting flagged, but a simple image of two fully clothed men out on the street kissing each other, the image got flagged and removed right away.

On the topic of the video and picture I used as an example, I actually took part in a FB wide protest because of how much traction that particular image managed to get. The idea and plot was to get as many people to share it as possible and to share it as widely as possible in protest that it got removed not by AI, but by what was confirmed at the time to be a HUMAN moderator, as they may be able to silence it from the OP, but they cannot silence it if EVERYONE shares it.

So yes... I can say with absolute certainty that especially since FB moderation has been taken over exclusively by AI, they are absolutely biased against gays, and they promote a LOT of anti gay material. The same holds true for anti Christian content. You can bash Christianity as a whole, and you can even share anti Christian memes, and they're viewed as perfectly acceptable, but if you share a picture or a thought that in any way offends Islam, you get put on Metapause.

They operate on a number of outrageous double standards where it's okay for one side to bash another, but as soon as the other side bashes back, they get the book thrown at them. It's also perfectly acceptable if sexually explicit content is hetero, or in a lot of cases, even lesbian, but the moment it's either gay, or it only depicts just a man, it's suddenly a no no. It's kind of disgusting actually because the standard should be the same no matter what side of the fence you're on. Either both sides should be able to do it, or neither side should be able to do it, but that's not how it works from my observation over the years.

https://www.facebook.com/breakingbattlegrounds/posts/the-al-jazeera-facebook-page-after-the-terrorist-attack-on-the-berlin-pride-atta/1470673751746432/

Sample:

"Salute"
"Is the car safe?"
"The car also hate them"
"Salute the person who did it"

But readers can decide, whether Meta/Facebook has - by not censoring - embraced anti-LGBT hate......... .......percent of real Muslims who celebrate it..... and so on.

https://humanevents.com/2026/07/27/berlin-lgbtq-activist-wishes-white-christian-carried-out-deadly-anti-gay-terror-attack-not-islamist

First let's mention machete. Add car & knife for 3 weapons total.

In Berlin on Saturday a man classified as an Islamist, who was known to police, had served time in a juvenile detention center, drove his [1] van into an LGBTQ Pride event. Then he got out of the car and started slashing people with a [2] machete. He murdered a woman, injured 29 other people

Police conducted a manhunt after the attack, finding Ballout about 20 hours later in a garden in the Spandau neighborhood of Berlin. He ran toward officers with a [3] knife causing police to open fire

& how some LGBT activists react?

Organizers of [Berlin Pride event] read a statement saying that the terror attack carried out by a radicalized Muslim young man should not be politicized.

vid - https://x.com/SkyNews/status/2081393662244646936/video/1

Too late tho: Abdul Ballout had already made political attack. (Not to be further political here. Just to state facts.)

The Christopher Street Day event was attacked because it was a gay, western event and not for any other reason.

Authorities said that Ballout belonged to the "Islamist scene" in Berlin. While he was born in Germany, his family is Lebanese and he apparently tried to join ISIS by traveling to Syria and Lebanon [which] imprisoned him for "incitement to religious and sectarian conflict,"

& this happened:

A[nother] speaker at the vigil following the attack [said] when she heard about the terror attack she hoped that the killer was not a Muslim but was a white Christian.

vid - https://x.com/JulianAdrat/status/2081447691066744843/video/1

"My first thought was, I hope [the attacker] is not a Kanako [variant of Kanake a German ethnic slur for non-Germanic-looking people], I hope it's a Christian White person but it wasn't so! And that’s where intersectionality came up yet again: we aren’t all fighting the same battles, but we are there for each other in moments like these—and that’s what leadership looks like."

It got applause tho I don't think it makes sense even in the original German.

Becuz........... think about it ......................
.................. she did the meme “What terrifies me is if ISIS were to detonate a nuclear device and kill 50 million Americans. Imagine the backlash against peaceful Muslims?” — Norm Macdonald (@normmacdonald), Dec 16, 2016

and, "Intersectionality"

@raphjd said:

was already known to the police as a possible terrorist

Not just in the UK but in the USA also. Those responsible include All of the so-called politicians, judges, prosecutors and so on, who Allow these Terrorists to enter and roam freely in our countries. These people aid and abet these scum, are as Guilty as the Terrorists and should be Executed along with the Terrorists.

If your religion requires you to hate someone, you need a new religion. Just sayin'