WARMTH OF COLLECTIVISM: Mamdani urges New Yorkers to keep AC at 78 degrees F during heat wave
-
@blablarg18
The reality of privatisation. -
@xyzzy141 No, the reality of a big government.
Those private actors who might be capable, DARE NOT MOVE or to do anything quickly or good. Only "connected" (politically) and incompetent private actors are granted crumbs.
so then, shit gets to be job of government, by default.
& they do either bad things or nothing, because "It's what commies & neo-feudal bureaucrats do. To fix power grid, is treated as impossible. To want to, is treated as sinful - except if it helps migrants."
Worst of all worlds.
But you don't have to live like this. It's Stockholm Syndrome - yourself being either abused or abuser or both - If you argue that you must live like this.
In USA: Trump government repairs public monuments, arrests criminals, stops child exploitation, stops destructive migrants, upgrades power supply - or permits private companies to, re-shores chip & auto manufacturing - or permits private companies to, builds rockets - or permits private companies to. & indeed they work at it
Not all is well - government debt is big problem or will be soon, like in UK - it might destroy currency. But in general, the more people tell commies & neo-feudal bureaucrats to go fuck themselves, the more people can live, do things & solve problems.
-
@xyzzy141 & u bringing up Giuliani - Really? You think he's good - really?? U think that???
If u must compare Zohran to Giuliani, quarter century ago - if that is what u libs (becuz that was Lib Memo which went around) are reduced to - then, Zohran is utter failure already. <<<
Thanks for playing!
gg -
Gosh I bet youāre a joy at dinner parties
-
@xyzzy141 collapse
leaves rubble -
Oh dearš¤. Youāre just boring thatās all.
-
@xyzzy141 U don't have to live like this
-
Communists always ration.
They give it to u first with smiles, then bullets.
Is your complaint that the very Capitalistic, for-profit, publicly traded on the New York Stock Exchange (the oldest stock on there!), S&P 500 energy corporation ConEd's failure to provide sufficient power to the residents of New York City is a failing of Communism?
That's like blaming starvation for obesity.
-
I wonder how much red tape and regulations have to do with the situation.
California, for example, is notoriously difficult when it comes to getting planning permission to build anything. Illinois is also well known for making it nearly impossible to improve anything. I don't see NY and NYC being any different.
-
@hubrys Chat-GPT is smarter than u. & not even alive
[q] con ed of new york. are they state-established monopoly? not in sense where state literally owns their shares but in sense where state guarantees their position as sole provider of something and tells them what they can, can't or should do. answer in less than 40 words.
[a - attempt 1] Con Ed is given exclusive service territory rights by New York and the stateās Public Service Commission heavily regulates its rates and operating obligations. That means itās a regulated geographic monopoly.
[a - attempt 2] YesāCon Edison is a state-regulated, service-territory delivery monopoly in practice: New Yorkās PSC grants it the franchise to be the default wires/steam utility and sets the rules and rates, with limited competition within that territory.
[q] to be clear: New York's legal regime intervenes to stop competitors for Con Ed and give it special, exclusive privilege in geographic areas? say yes or no, whichever is closest.
[a] Yes. New Yorkās PSC authorizes utilities like Con Edison to serve defined geographic āservice territoriesā as the default regulated delivery provider, while limiting meaningful competition within those areas.
ok?
STATE-DIRECTED, STATE-PROTECTED MONOPOLY, genius
This fits what I told @xyzzy141 earlier:
Reality of a big government. Those private actors who might be capable, DARE NOT MOVE or to do anything quickly or good. Only "connected" (politically) and incompetent private actors are granted crumbs.
But u say
blaming starvation for obesity
ok, I got u to 1. defend communism, at least by implication or comparison to what you falsely claim is "capitalism", and yet, 2. admit it's starvation. Thanks for playing! gg
Hello! It looks like you're interested in this conversation, but you don't have an account yet.
Getting fed up of having to scroll through the same posts each visit? When you register for an account, you'll always come back to exactly where you were before, and choose to be notified of new replies (either via email, or push notification). You'll also be able to save bookmarks and upvote posts to show your appreciation to other community members.
With your input, this post could be even better š
Register Login