• Categories
    • Recent
    • Tags
    • Popular
    • Users
    • Groups
    • Torrents
    • Login

    WARMTH OF COLLECTIVISM: Mamdani urges New Yorkers to keep AC at 78 degrees F during heat wave

    Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved Politics & Debate
    18 Posts 4 Posters 68 Views
    Loading More Posts
    • Oldest to Newest
    • Newest to Oldest
    • Most Votes
    Reply
    • Reply as topic
    Log in to reply
    This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
    • X Offline
      xyzzy141 @raphjd
      last edited by

      @raphjd not quite. The UK national grid is going through its largest operational upgrade ever. Costs likely to spiral of course, some sources suggest could end up costing Ā£120B. On top of the grid itself there are some reactor replacements including Sizewell and Hinkley point C, plus about 30 more initiatives for nuclear power involving smaller facilities. Energy usage in the UK is likely to increase by 50%. Sorry if this feels off-narrative but it’s all verifiable. I would say however they wait until they have no choice which is a decidedly panicked way of doing things, that being said, any business I have worked for has been the same, leave it until it’s desperate.

      raphjdR 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
      • raphjdR Offline
        raphjd Forum Administrator @xyzzy141
        last edited by

        @xyzzy141

        Partially true.

        The UK is doing a massive program of installing electric pylons through the countryside. They aren't doing anything to improve the grid in the areas where people live. The pylons, at least in Scotland, are solely to take electricity from the solar farms (to be built) to wherever it's going. They are clear-cutting forests for these solar farms.

        Ed Miliband is taking the country to Net Zero at any cost, which is why the UK has the highest energy costs, despite Labour's lies about reducing them.

        Any new power plant, especially nuclear, will take decades to go online.

        X 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
        • X Offline
          xyzzy141 @raphjd
          last edited by

          @raphjd agreed this is something we should have started significant investment in during the 80’s and 90’s. Instead we focussed on financial services(a focus Brown-Blair had in the 2000’s before you think I’m marking this partisan), free-reign to the city providing them with different fiscal rules to the rest of the country so they could facilitate transactions to backwater countries easier and have fewer controls over their balance sheet, selling off the infrastructure for cheap allowing a certain few to profit from it in the short term rather than considering long term implications.

          Not wanting to invest in skills and trade we lagged behind on technology which over time relinquishes our hard won sovereignty (economic controls the political).

          As a result we have bankrupt country that can only make investments other people are willing to provide funding for - we have no money of our own. They may not be what everyone wants but it’s something.

          Either way, to the OP keeping AC under control in NYC is hardly a path to bullets given it’s in line with rules existent under various mayors of NYC including Giuliani.

          B 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
          • B Offline
            blablarg18 @xyzzy141
            last edited by blablarg18

            @xyzzy141 Listen to yourself talk about essential things -not- happening or they take decades with politically-driven massive cost overruns.

            You don't have to live like this.

            It's not right & you really don't

            X 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
            • X Offline
              xyzzy141 @blablarg18
              last edited by

              @blablarg18
              The reality of privatisation.

              B 2 Replies Last reply Reply Quote 0
              • B Offline
                blablarg18 @xyzzy141
                last edited by blablarg18

                @xyzzy141 No, the reality of a big government.

                Those private actors who might be capable, DARE NOT MOVE or to do anything quickly or good. Only "connected" (politically) and incompetent private actors are granted crumbs.

                so then, shit gets to be job of government, by default.

                & they do either bad things or nothing, because "It's what commies & neo-feudal bureaucrats do. To fix power grid, is treated as impossible. To want to, is treated as sinful - except if it helps migrants."

                Worst of all worlds.

                But you don't have to live like this. It's Stockholm Syndrome - yourself being either abused or abuser or both - If you argue that you must live like this.

                In USA: Trump government repairs public monuments, arrests criminals, stops child exploitation, stops destructive migrants, upgrades power supply - or permits private companies to, re-shores chip & auto manufacturing - or permits private companies to, builds rockets - or permits private companies to. & indeed they work at it

                Not all is well - government debt is big problem or will be soon, like in UK - it might destroy currency. But in general, the more people tell commies & neo-feudal bureaucrats to go fuck themselves, the more people can live, do things & solve problems.

                1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                • B Offline
                  blablarg18 @xyzzy141
                  last edited by blablarg18

                  @xyzzy141 & u bringing up Giuliani - Really? You think he's good - really?? U think that???

                  If u must compare Zohran to Giuliani, quarter century ago - if that is what u libs (becuz that was Lib Memo which went around) are reduced to - then, Zohran is utter failure already. <<<

                  Thanks for playing! šŸ™‚ gg

                  X 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                  • X Offline
                    xyzzy141 @blablarg18
                    last edited by

                    @blablarg18

                    Gosh I bet you’re a joy at dinner parties

                    B 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                    • B Offline
                      blablarg18 @xyzzy141
                      last edited by blablarg18

                      @xyzzy141 collapse ā˜ leaves rubble

                      X 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                      • X Offline
                        xyzzy141 @blablarg18
                        last edited by xyzzy141

                        @blablarg18

                        Oh dear🤭. You’re just boring that’s all.

                        B 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                        • B Offline
                          blablarg18 @xyzzy141
                          last edited by

                          @xyzzy141 U don't have to live like this

                          1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                          • H Offline
                            hubrys @blablarg18
                            last edited by

                            @blablarg18 said:

                            Communists always ration.

                            They give it to u first with smiles, then bullets.

                            Is your complaint that the very Capitalistic, for-profit, publicly traded on the New York Stock Exchange (the oldest stock on there!), S&P 500 energy corporation ConEd's failure to provide sufficient power to the residents of New York City is a failing of Communism?

                            That's like blaming starvation for obesity.

                            raphjdR B 2 Replies Last reply Reply Quote 0
                            • raphjdR Offline
                              raphjd Forum Administrator @hubrys
                              last edited by

                              @hubrys

                              I wonder how much red tape and regulations have to do with the situation.

                              California, for example, is notoriously difficult when it comes to getting planning permission to build anything. Illinois is also well known for making it nearly impossible to improve anything. I don't see NY and NYC being any different.

                              1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 1
                              • B Offline
                                blablarg18 @hubrys
                                last edited by blablarg18

                                @hubrys Chat-GPT is smarter than u. & not even alive šŸ‘½

                                [q] con ed of new york. are they state-established monopoly? not in sense where state literally owns their shares but in sense where state guarantees their position as sole provider of something and tells them what they can, can't or should do. answer in less than 40 words.

                                [a - attempt 1] Con Ed is given exclusive service territory rights by New York and the state’s Public Service Commission heavily regulates its rates and operating obligations. That means it’s a regulated geographic monopoly.

                                [a - attempt 2] Yes—Con Edison is a state-regulated, service-territory delivery monopoly in practice: New York’s PSC grants it the franchise to be the default wires/steam utility and sets the rules and rates, with limited competition within that territory.

                                [q] to be clear: New York's legal regime intervenes to stop competitors for Con Ed and give it special, exclusive privilege in geographic areas? say yes or no, whichever is closest.

                                [a] Yes. New York’s PSC authorizes utilities like Con Edison to serve defined geographic ā€œservice territoriesā€ as the default regulated delivery provider, while limiting meaningful competition within those areas.

                                ok?

                                STATE-DIRECTED, STATE-PROTECTED MONOPOLY, genius šŸ™„ 🤣

                                This fits what I told @xyzzy141 earlier:

                                Reality of a big government. Those private actors who might be capable, DARE NOT MOVE or to do anything quickly or good. Only "connected" (politically) and incompetent private actors are granted crumbs.

                                But u say

                                blaming starvation for obesity

                                ok, I got u to 1. defend communism, at least by implication or comparison to what you falsely claim is "capitalism", and yet, 2. admit it's starvation. Thanks for playing! gg

                                1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0

                                Hello! It looks like you're interested in this conversation, but you don't have an account yet.

                                Getting fed up of having to scroll through the same posts each visit? When you register for an account, you'll always come back to exactly where you were before, and choose to be notified of new replies (either via email, or push notification). You'll also be able to save bookmarks and upvote posts to show your appreciation to other community members.

                                With your input, this post could be even better šŸ’—

                                Register Login
                                • 1 / 1
                                • First post
                                  Last post