<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" version="2.0"><channel><title><![CDATA[Remember those covid &quot;PCR&quot; tests that added to mass panic? They were more often wrong than you can possibly imagine]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p dir="auto">Germany study: Only 14% of positive PCR tests meant real covid.</p>
<p dir="auto"><a href="https://www.frontiersin.org/journals/epidemiology/articles/10.3389/fepid.2025.1592629/full" rel="nofollow ugc">https://www.frontiersin.org/journals/epidemiology/articles/10.3389/fepid.2025.1592629/full</a></p>
<blockquote>
<p dir="auto">In Germany, a consortium of authority-accredited laboratories (ALM) covered approximately 90% of all severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) polymerase chain reaction (PCR) tests during the COVID-19 pandemic (March 2020 until January 2023), and they likewise conducted serological mass tests for IgG antibodies until May 2021. We analyzed the ALM-observed week-resolved time courses of test-positive fractions of PCR and IgG tests, by least-squares fitting a simple function of the former to the course of the latter. Specifically, we show that scaling and shifting the cumulative sum of previous PCR-positive fractions effectively reproduces the time course of the IgG-positive fraction. The value of 0.14 found for the fitted scaling parameter means that <em><strong>only 14% of those who were tested PCR-positively actually became infected with SARS-CoV-2</strong></em>. This parameter fit further implies that a quarter of the German population already carried IgG antibodies from natural infections in their blood at the turn of the year from 2020 to 2021. To check this fit using a second, independent analysis, we took from the literature the Germany-specific ratio of 1:10 for the ratio between one positive PCR test and the corresponding number of persons actually infected with SARS-CoV-2, and therewith estimated the time course of the latter within the German population. The courses of all three fractions, i.e., both the observed and the fit-estimated IgG-positives and the fit-estimated infected, matched each other well in the period from early December 2020 to May 2021. The extrapolated courses of both the fit-estimated fractions, i.e., those of the IgG-positives and the infected, align well to perfectly with the IgG-positive fraction (92%) reported by the Robert Koch Institute at the end of 2021.</p>
</blockquote>
<p dir="auto">In short:</p>
<ul>
<li>
<p dir="auto">IgG test is 92% accurate to say if you had covid, gives them a good checking tool.</p>
</li>
<li>
<p dir="auto">PCR positive kinda mapped to IgG-positive, but far far less than you'd hope.</p>
</li>
<li>
<p dir="auto">PCR predicted actual covid like 14% of the time. That tiny.</p>
</li>
</ul>
]]></description><link>https://community.gaytor.rent/topic/68275/remember-those-covid-pcr-tests-that-added-to-mass-panic-they-were-more-often-wrong-than-you-can-possibly-imagine</link><generator>RSS for Node</generator><lastBuildDate>Wed, 08 Apr 2026 07:01:06 GMT</lastBuildDate><atom:link href="https://community.gaytor.rent/topic/68275.rss" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/><pubDate>Sat, 06 Dec 2025 20:11:28 GMT</pubDate><ttl>60</ttl></channel></rss>