I was wondering as an "easy question" if admins could tell percentage of people are using QTM to validate/upload their torrents? That seems like an interesting number!

As a hard question, can you tell over the last year (etc) how many QTM vs non-QTM uploads have had a low Video:Image ratio? That's the truely interesting one!!

...

I've seen sooo many people complain about thumbnails

If QTM is still under development ( @geographer ? ), could I suggest these "simple" tweaks;

• [FAQ]: add a button to open the guide (eg to the right of the "Upload Torrent" button, called "FAQ")

• [Thumbnail]: a button to open the latest thread about video thumbnails and programs (button to the right of "Upload" and "FAQ", "Thumbnails"? aligned left from Quit still with an expanding gap still)

• "Stats". new row after the Upload/FilePath row (or the space to the right of categories). A grid to show
  "Files found:|100
  Videos:|80
  Img2Vid ratio:|0.2
  Named Thumbnail Ratio:| 0.01
  [Rescan]"

My thinking: easy to scan for movie files, then matching filesnames elsewhere. If there is 100% matching vids to pics, gold star to the uploader! 🤩

Second: informing the uploader as early as possible. Instant feedback reward. Dopamine for a smilie face, potential reaction from downloaders. Enough hesitation to check forum thread how to do it.

If there is a Github instead, happy to put money-where-my-mouth-is and contribute there. On the QTM page it has a broken link to a "known bugs" forum page and my searches didn't get me far

Thanks for consideration