https://x.com/i/status/1960122907859779829

2. Clintons celebrated Ghislaine, years AFTER abuse allegations emerged.

https://thepostmillennial.com/clinton-global-initiative-celebrated-ghislaine-maxwell-4-years-after-sexual-abuse-allegations-surfaced-report

[she] was praised as a guest at the Clinton Global Initiative conference in September 2013, according to a new report from CNN.

Maxwell was on the list of guests who had been personally recommended by Bill or Hillary Clinton for complimentary access to the conference, a source familiar with the list told the outlet. She was lauded alongside other "Commitment to Action” leaders at the event.

Before Maxwell was honored at the 2013 conference, major news outlets in America and the UK had covered allegations that she recruited young girls for Epstein as well as participated in the abuse. She had previously been barred from other official Clinton events in 2011, meaning the organization was likely aware of the allegations.

3. Epstein used to help one drug cartel recover money from another. BILLIONs$$. & take a cut

Ghislaine cites Sinaloa Cartel (CIA-linked) as potential illustration.

4. Ghislaine denies involvement with Mossad, but affirms involvement with Ehud Barak.... buddy of Clinton & other USA Dems, former head of Israel military intelligence, & Trump hater.

The difference is that Trump files lawsuits on his own; he does not use taxpayer money to do it, like Democrats do.

Literally up until last month when he and his DOJ lost in front of the 2nd Circuit Court of Appeals, Trump was arguing that he could use the Department of Justice (funded by the taxpayers) as his personal horde of lawyers for his appeal of the E. Jean Carroll defamation suit.

Prior to wanting taxpayers to pay for his defense, Trump had been using political donations from his supporters to pay all of his legal bills (well, at least the legal bills that he chose to pay, since he is notorious for not paying his debts to lawyers).

Trump's only using "his" money because the Judiciary literally refused to allow him to rob the taxpayers for his own interests. You don't know what you're talking about.

Before Trump 45, the SCOTUS was liberal.

Leftist judges are trying to stop Trump at every turn. In some cases, they are even ignoring legal precedent and SCOTUS rulings.

Biden even admitted he was only going to appoint a token, black woman. That is the infamous "I'm not a biologist" KJB.

Even in the UK, judges are extremely political.

You are making excuses for lawfare by the Democrats. Justice is supposed to be blind, not politically biased.

The difference is that Trump files lawsuits on his own; he does not use taxpayer money to do it, like Democrats do.

Yes, I'm not happy that Trump did not release the documents. Trump not releasing the Epstein files is not proof that he's implicated in them. If they did implicate Trump or anyone close to Trump, then the Democrats would have prosecuted him or, at the very least, used it to claim he was part of it.

I know you are not an American, but you are a leftist.

If Trump were guilty of something related to Epstein, Biden and Co would have prosecuted him.

Trump was prosecuted for overinflating the value of his property, despite the banks saying they didn't have an issue with it. Jon Stewart infamously overinflated the value of his property many times greater than Trump was accused of, and was never prosecuted. Democrat Rep Jerry Nadler also overvalued his property greater than Trump did and was never prosecuted.

Trump faced targeted lawfare by the Democrats.

So don't give me that crap.

video - https://x.com/i/status/1948743669135139067

Meanwhile: Trump officials meet with Ghislaine Maxwell.

https://thepostmillennial.com/doj-to-meet-with-maxwell-again-in-tallahassee-after-she-was-seen-with-big-box

George Washington University law professor Jonathan Turley said that past reports that she was interviewed by state and federal authorities were not true, and that she may be an "untapped source of new information" in the Epstein case.

"I was surprised, in speaking with a member of the legal defense team a couple days ago, when they said that reports that she had been previously interviewed by federal and state prosecutors [and] investigators was not true. She has never been interviewed. Yes, and despite all of these past investigations in this scandal, I was really taken aback by that. So if that's true, she could be an untapped source of new information.

Info sought by Trump.................. .......... not by Dems

@serenity use your words

Youtube Video

Now it is clear, why Trump hides his papers.

1. Libs FRANTIC to paint Trump as one of themselves - as Epstein client or pedo.

Hakim Jeffries vid - https://x.com/i/status/1948044716064571576

"It is reasonable to conclude......." means Hakim got nothing.

2. Trump DOJ has sued to get Epstein stuff out. Judges block it.

https://www.yahoo.com/news/articles/federal-judge-kills-trump-plan-185716431.html

3. MSNBC says John Kerry is in Epstein files.

vid - https://x.com/i/status/1948370832784306289

https://x.com/AGPamBondi/status/1947622027587723365

Statement from @DAGToddBlanche:

This Department of Justice does not shy away from uncomfortable truths, nor from the responsibility to pursue justice wherever the facts may lead.

The joint statement by the DOJ and FBI of July 6 remains as accurate today as it was when it was written. Namely, that in the recent thorough review of the files maintained by the FBI in the Epstein case, no evidence was uncovered that could predicate an investigation against uncharged third parties. [ed:clients]

President Trump has told us to release all credible evidence. If Ghislane Maxwell has information about anyone who has committed crimes against victims, the FBI and the DOJ will hear what she has to say.

Therefore, at the direction of Attorney General Bondi, I have communicated with counsel for Ms. Maxwell to determine whether she would be willing to speak with prosecutors from the Department.

I anticipate meeting with Ms. Maxwell in the coming days. Until now, no administration on behalf of the Department had inquired about her willingness to meet with the government. That changes now.

But here is weird part: MAYBE TRUE.

Maxwell was prosecuted under Biden-Kamabla. Why would they ask her?

CIA might ask her.

But old DOJ-FBI, to avoid any cases against Deep State or libs, would avoid question. & Maxwell seeing that, might also. "Don't ask, don't tell."

shorter - Trump "DOJ to meet with Ghislaine Maxwell...in coming days"

https://thepostmillennial.com/breaking-doj-to-meet-with-ghislaine-maxwell

Congress wants in:

https://thepostmillennial.com/breaking-house-oversight-votes-to-subpoena-ghislaine-maxwell-over-epstein-files

HAHAHAHAHAhahahahahha even Libs want it

trump got libs to do meme

Bits you just said there, are already debunked. Please catch up.

@hubrys what if both trump and biden are on the list?

that's comical, Trump and Epstein were close friends for over 15 years. Trump wrote him birthday cards. Trump is on the flight logs. Biden did none of that

His interest:

• Huge civil rights-y lib, OJ Simpson lawyer as well as Epstein lawyer

• Tries to be consistent. Dershowitz went on to defend President Trump from fake impeachment, sometimes appeared on Fox & Tucker Carlson

• Dershowitz got accused by an Epstein victim, but later she retracted.

• Later still, she died in mysterious suicide.

https://x.com/CitizenFreePres/status/1946645216892473764/photo/1

Client names "should be disclosed but the courts have ordered them sealed. I know who they are. They do not include any current office holders. We don't know if the accusations are true."

"The media can and should petition the courts for release of all names and information so the public can draw its own conclusions"

"Open records show an acquaintance between Epstein and Mr. Trump many years ago. That relationship ended when Mr. Trump reportedly banned Epstein from Mar-a-Lago, long before becoming President. I have seen nothing that would suggest anything improper or even questionable by Mr. Trump."

"It is clear from the evidence that Epstein committed suicide. What isn't clear is whether he was assisted by jail personnel [which indeed] seems likely to me."

"Epstein never worked for any intelligence agency. If he had, he surely would have told me and his other lawyers who would have used this information to get a[n even] better deal."

"That false story - recently peddled by Tucker Carlson - probably emanted from credible allegations that Robert Maxwell, father of Ghislaine, worked with the Mossad."

btw & to counter balance.........

Here is recent Tucker podcast, covers Epstein & Maxwell ties to Mossad & CIA.

Youtube Video

https://thepostmillennial.com/breaking-trump-sues-dow-jones-news-corp-rupert-murdoch-wall-street-journal-reporters-for-libel-over-epstein-letter-story

two Wall Street Journal reporters, the Dow Jones, Rupert Murdoch, and News Corp over a Wall Street Journal report claiming he sent a sexually suggestive birthday letter to Jeffrey Epstein in 2003. He called the story “fake” and denied any connection to the drawing allegedly bearing his signature.

btw - even Michael Cohen - yes, THAT guy - says Trump never doodles & probably can't doodle.

https://x.com/CollinRugg/status/1946335514480812356

In his mind: Best case for libs & WSJ, is that Epstein assistant contacted Trump assistant who did it.

Autopen, anybody?

but that assumes WSJ has something.

Rn.......it is still possible that WSJ never had anything, went off hearsay of some lib.

"you can't make this shit up"

https://x.com/susancrabtree/status/1946181256020181176

The Wall Street Journal reporter who broke the “blockbuster” story alleging a letter Trump wrote to Epstein for his 50th birthday included some tawdry elements previously worked for Main Justice (his only prior reporting experience listed in his bio).

Main Justice was Glenn Simpson’s wife’s publication. Simpson founded Fusion GPS, which was paid by Hillary Clinton/the DNC (through Perkins Coie) to produce the Steele Dossier at the center of the Russian hoax against Trump.

btw - are Murdoch employees as lib-liar as NYT & other places? yes

Both Glenn Simpson and his wife, Mary Jacoby, worked for the Wall Street Journal before launching their own enterprises

Funny thing tho.

Murdochs are lib, but they want conservative audience & must get some stuff right.

Liars need your trust. & that is when Fox, NY Post, The Sun, Sky News etc. do good stuff.

Here, Fox re-posts funny "Ron Burgundy" moment of Dana Bash & CNN

vid - https://x.com/FoxNews/status/1945994237612319200

More fun. Liar-on-liar violence.

Jamie Raskin, D, lies nonstop.

Morning Joe guy was top asshole to defend Biden brain.

Morning Joe guy must build trust. What does he do? he undercuts Raskin - with truth.

It was a crisis then. It's a crisis now. Why didn’t Democrats call for the Epstein list release from 21 to 25?

Raskin squirms

vid - https://x.com/i/status/1945841012712051000

More. "Dems fumble when asked why they didn't release Epstein files when they controlled Congress"

https://thepostmillennial.com/dems-fumble-when-asked-why-they-didnt-release-epstein-files-when-they-controlled-congress

Poor Pramila, in such low company.

Fun theory.

https://www.coffeeandcovid.com/p/honeypot-friday-july-18-2025-c-and

tldr;

• Trump in 2019 had accurate case against Epstein

• reflected in 2019 Grand Jury transcripts

• Dems spent 2021-25 mucking it with fake & misleading evidence, such as "Lettergate"

• THUS...... Trump today wants to release 2019 Grand Jury case, while Dems demand "full Epstein file" ie. what they planted & sabotaged

Possible answer:

• Usual Fakers faked this thing in WSJ?

• as we know they faked network logs for Russiagate, faked call logs for 2019 impeachment etc.

• Trump knew it was coming? faked his own Epstein controversy to pre-empt them?

Do you honestly believe that the DNC would have ignored that as part of their lawfare against Trump?

Hell, he was prosecuted for overinflating the value his property, something others, like Jon Stewart, infamously did to a greater amount than Trump. None of them were prosecuted for it, because, as we all know, justice is blind or so the lie goes.

The Wall Street Journal published a hatchet job article with a FAKE “birthday letter” that is supposedly from 2003.

This is like the Steele Dossier that kickstarted “the Russia, Russia, Russia” Hoax all over again.

The WSJ refused to show us the letter and conceded they don’t even have it in their possession when we asked them to verify the alleged document they’re basing their ENTIRE fake story on.

When has President Trump ever spoken like the conversation alleged in the fake WSJ story? That’s not at all how he speaks or writes.

The WSJ knowingly published false information to smear the President of the United States.

As I said at the podium today, there is a coordinated Hoax by the Democrats and Fake News to smear President Trump — as we’ve seen throughout both of his terms.

https://x.com/PressSec/status/1946013505167233294

I mainly laugh -with- Leavitt, -at- Fake News WSJ who have track record of hoaxes.

Earlier, I said

Possibly, Biden-Kamabla-Garland planted a bomb - fake evidence, exaggerations, "low confidence" reports - that smear Trump & he doesn't want (us) to bother with it

That bomb may have just dropped.

I also said:

Double psy op? Libs go "Oh we can divide MAGA with some Epstein drama". Trump-Bondi-Kash go "More attention, works for us"