Not even stupid, just slow. I have secret hope, that our slow-witted libs might catch up finally.

For instance, I would never tell a mentally handicapped person that they were stupid, but if someone who is supposed to be reasonably intelligent did or said something bad, I might say they were stupid.

The difference is... implying that one is stupid vs implying that they are behaving stupidly and should know better.

Another example is that I used to criticize trans people a lot. The reason was that I know of some trans people that murdered someone 12 years ago in a most horrific way. Some trans people got on my ass and convinced me to stop denigrating trans people - which I did. Then, a couple of months ago.. this suicidal trans blew in from hell, destroyed at least one guy's life, and Is now destroying the life of my best friend. This trans has already attempted suicide at least twice in the past 3 years, and talks about committing suicide every week. It has vowed to commit suicide if Trump wins. So, I urge everyone to vote for Trump.

Don't worry, I don't back-date rules.

It's still banned on the rest of the forums though.

I'd only ask fair warning.

I call @jaroonn retard as he earns it

But I have no problem with fairly-enforced rules. Either I adapt or get busy elsewhere, never a problem.

It was about using the word "tard" in any form, except in a quote.

I might bring that rule back in.

First - libtar* obviously means libtard, just replacing one letter with * as people often do, with Internet posts.

No issue there. None.

Second - if there were - don't be spelling-grammar Nazi (to top, @jaroonn, how u already support Nazi policies like pro-censorship, pro-war, & Nazis of Ukraine)

Third - if there were cause to call it out - it'd be funny, not sad.

RETARD