And yet you NEEDED to reply.

I also do not believe

I can't think of anything more inconsequential.

I know how much you hate all Muslims (because you are so unbiased), so am just going to let that lie.

Unlike you, I don't get wet by the thought of someone wanting to kill me or those that fuck kids.

I also do not believe that you don't know the antics of your profession and their promotion of childing fucking and all the other shit you people push.

I also know how important having the last word feeds into your delusions of having won an argument (and when you feel yourself slipping you throw in some unrelated topic such as Palestinian "shit"), so I will just give you this one. It's too absurd to be arsed about.

SO, 40+ years in a profession that has pushed child fucking and later (about 25 years now) has pushed MAP because they think it doesn't sound as bad as pedo and you never heard of it?!

If you are telling the truth (extremely doubtful), then you spent your entire career under a rock.

We aren't talking about ultra-fringe stuff here. We are talking about stuff that's been well-reported about for decades.

Next, you are going to try telling us that you never heard that professors are actively pushing pro-Palestine shit.

No one believes you.

Speaking for the world now, are we? It might be a frontal lobe issue. I might recommend an EEG.

You can try to insult my intelligence as much as you like. Just remember that you profess that every academic in the world is aware of every field, opinion, theory, etc. out there. As I've told you repeatedly: sexual deviation is not a hobby of mine. I'm not well-versed on the topic.

You still haven't answered if you are a total fucktard liar or a clueless twat.

40+ years and you claim you had no idea what your profession has been pushing. No one believes you.

So, which is it?

Are you the most clueless fucktard on the planet or are you a blatant liar?

You can't be a 65yo professor and have absolutely no clue what kind of shit your fellow professors are pushing for the last 40+ years.

We are well versed in your profession's push to promote child fucking because we are against it.
Prior to 25 years ago when your profession started pushing MAP, you losers pushed plain old child fucking. You didn't try to hide your agenda.
I still say you are a liar or the dumbest fucktard on the planet that you had no clue about what your profession has been doing all these years.

I'm just going to let that statement stand as is. Everything that you are is summed up there perfectly. Like I've said before, sometimes I am not sure if you are just playing Devil's advocate, or really are that thick. And so much for your "unbiased" BS. What a clown.

We are well versed in your profession's push to promote child fucking because we are against it.

Prior to 25 years ago when your profession started pushing MAP, you losers pushed plain old child fucking. You didn't try to hide your agenda.

I still say you are a liar or the dumbest fucktard on the planet that you had no clue about what your profession has been doing all these years.

He's the most clueless person I've ever met. Everyone else knows things going on within their own profession.

I would say you are the most clueless person you've ever met if you expect and English Linguistics professor to know about such things. Doesn't come up much in discussion of syntax and semantics.

Like I've said, you and blabarg are the only two people I've ever talk to who are so well-versed in the subject of pedophilia.

He thinks Woke-DEI extreme racism is "beautiful" (his word).

& thinks CNN, NYT etc are "true journalism"

He claims that he only recently (from me) heard the term MAP.

This is even though it's his fellow professors who have been pushing that term for the last 25ish years.

He's the most clueless person I've ever met. Everyone else knows things going on within their own profession.

some @jaroonn indefensible positions

• he supports & defends Azov Nazis - or denies their existence, similar effect in practice

• excuses/explains dictators who cancel elections

• defends Planned Parenthood's modern-day defense of Margaret Sanger's racist genocide against Blacks: https://community.gaytor.rent/topic/65129/21-quotes-by-margaret-sanger-that-will-probably-make-you-sick/

• defends White libs who put non-lib Blacks in their (supposed) place: https://community.gaytor.rent/topic/64627/trump-supporter-vs-liberal-debate

• defends rapists: Joe Biden, Bill & Hillary Clinton

• thinks men can have working womb & breasts, women can have penis

• wants 'P' in LGBT* acronym, even though effect of supposed "Pansexual" is pedophile inclusion

Only a sample. Others could add more.

Have a good day

I'm already better than you.

Perhaps, since you are part of the "less evil" group, I can expect better from you in the future?

The study was about how conservatives were supposed to be the evil ones, but it found that you losers are 3 times worse.

It's like how liberal women have the highest rate of mental illness and conservative men have the lowest, as found in at least 2 studies.

It reminds me of when the German gov did a study on DV and found that 70% of one-sided DV was by the woman. Harvard lost their liberal rag and wanted to prove that totally wrong. Instead, Harvard came out with slightly (1 or 2%) higher results.

What rings a bell: Libs who hate it & can't handle it, when reminded of (awful, indefensible) positions they've taken.

Ring a bell?