Question SCOTUS agreed to decide: Whether and if so to what extent does a former President enjoy presidential immunity from criminal prosecution for conduct alleged to involve official acts during his tenure in office?

Arguments in April.

Decision published later - Late summer? Meanwhile, lower courts told to hold off.

Huge delay to Fake Jack Smith's fake J6 & Classified Docs cases.

Meanwhile, Dirty Fani falls to pieces & NY cases are jokes, received with widespread derision.

Hardest hit: Me. I did want spectacle where Trump wins his election from jail.

Next hardest: Libs, whose articles & comments now laughably try to reassure each other (echo chamber) that SCOTUS is only being picky, will bend to their will.

Will Chamberlain comments:

The most likely scenario, IMO, is that the Court agrees with Trump's legal position, reverse the DC Circuit and holds that former Presidents are immune from criminal prosecution for official acts, save for those that lead to an impeachment and a conviction by the Senate. Then they will likely remand back to the District Court for further proceedings - which would be some sort of hearing/analysis of whether Trump's conduct in fact involved official acts.

And then those proceedings would again be subject to appeal, and it would likely go through the DC Circuit and up to the Supreme Court again. That would take months - and those proceedings would only start in June/July. After a second round of appellate proceedings, there's basically no chance of there being enough time for a trial before the election.