A seven-year-old boy has been removed from his mother’s care by the high court, after he was found to be suffering “significant emotional harm” due to his mother raising him as a girl.

The judge in the case slammed social services who had simply accepted that the boy should be treated as a girl...However, the boy, who cannot be named and is now living with his father, has naturally reverted to having masculine interests since leaving the care of his mother, the court heard...
...the boy had settled in well with his father and his father’s partner, actively choosing, with no pressure from either adult, to pursue interests typically seen as masculine...
...Power Rangers, SpongeBob, superheroes and is constantly finding new interests … It is striking that most of [the boy’s] interests are male-oriented.

High court got that last bit wrong.

It's not "striking" that a boy's interests would be male-oriented.
AND...... it proves nothing, if they are male-oriented or even if they are not male-oriented.

Gender-atypical and cross-gender play are NORMAL for kids.

Gender-atypical and cross-gender play mean NOTHING for kids, whether they happen or don't happen.

To judge a kid's gender by their play is incredibly regressive.

18th-century. No matter which "side" does it. Boy's mother did it too - and was even more wrong.

As such, rest of the court's finding (against her) is spot on.

Boy's mother, it seems, is another AWFL. (Affluent White Female Liberal - self-centered, needs to warp children to her own agenda)

Every child is perfect as they were born.....and cannot meaningfully choose against it, no more than children can meaningfully choose their own bedtime or school attendance or vaccination status.