<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" version="2.0"><channel><title><![CDATA[Study: Covid lockdowns did almost nothing]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p dir="auto"><a href="https://iea.org.uk/publications/did-lockdowns-work-the-verdict-on-covid-restrictions/" rel="nofollow ugc">https://iea.org.uk/publications/did-lockdowns-work-the-verdict-on-covid-restrictions/</a></p>
<blockquote>
<p dir="auto">lockdowns in the spring of 2020 had a negligible effect on COVID-19 mortality</p>
</blockquote>
<blockquote>
<p dir="auto">lockdowns should be rejected out of hand as a pandemic policy instrument</p>
</blockquote>
<p dir="auto">One problem: This type of study half-implies, maybe if lockdowns did something, they coulda been justified. Nope.</p>
<p dir="auto">Covid lockdowns were <em>wrong morally</em>.</p>
<p dir="auto">Telling ordinary people (no due process) they can't leave homes for weeks or months &amp; can't question policy, <em>is wrong, period</em>.</p>
]]></description><link>https://community.gaytor.rent/topic/62464/study-covid-lockdowns-did-almost-nothing</link><generator>RSS for Node</generator><lastBuildDate>Sun, 12 Apr 2026 16:55:04 GMT</lastBuildDate><atom:link href="https://community.gaytor.rent/topic/62464.rss" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/><pubDate>Tue, 06 Jun 2023 15:11:45 GMT</pubDate><ttl>60</ttl></channel></rss>