Why are you so racist against Macedonians?

You can click on their source link.

In order to be on this site, you have to be an adult. An adult would be able to click the source link in the article I post.

https://www.eipartnership.net/2020/north-macedonian-content-farms

They quote from and link to the original source.

Then the question remains, why don't you post that original source when you place the information here in the forum? It seems that would save you all the trouble of having egg on your face for posting such ridiculous clickfarm links.

You are a stupid, useless twat, liar.

Resist the Mainstream does in fact list their sources in every article. I have to question if you are simply a pathological liar or you head is so far up your vagina that you are totally clueless or both.

They quote from and link to the original source.

You are still a sniveling why racist bitch.

You know that they get all of their "news" from other sites, but you still hate them because they aren't leftist assclowns like you.

Joy "I was hacked" Reid made racist and homophobic social media posts, then lied about it claiming someone went back in time and t hacked her. She even got the FBI involved. Eventually, she admitted she was a pathological liar and you losers still believe every word she says.

They list is never ending on the scumbags from liberal media that you worship, but only are nothing more than a racist against Macedonians.

The 2 questions are

1. is content factual
2. is content on topic

A basic start in determining #1 is by asking where does the information come from. If it comes from a clickfarm run by the good people of Macedonia in order to make money, and that website is the only one provided in the discussion where that claim is made, and that website does not, itself, list any proof of where it got its information from, then we're on a pretty good path to determining that it's something to be extremely suspect of.

If someone made the claim that "it's raining in Tucson", and you knew that the person making that claim didn't live in Tucson, one of the first questions you would ask to determine the factuality of it would be "how do you know it's raining in Tucson". Epistemological questions such as this are always relevant.

https://twitter.com/DrLoupis/status/1654767087259197440

"This is a girl’s forearm. Her muscles have been farmed to create a fake phallus that doesn’t function. They will try to make her a fake urethra. She’ll probably be incontinent, she will certainly never function like a man. And her muscles won’t grow back."

Congratulations.

Also congrats for misunderstanding my point in another thread, about Shoot The Messenger.

Suppose I (messenger) say "It's raining" (content).

The fact that I (messenger) said it, has -no bearing- on whether it (content) is true.

Either it's raining or it isn't. Horrible as you may find me, -I am irrelevant- as to whether it's raining in fact.

Of course, if topic is cookie recipes, my content "It's raining" is itself irrelevant even if it is factual.

So question is NEVER "Where did content come from", but always 2,

1. is content factual
2. is content on-topic

Now suppose I (messenger) say "Trans lobby typically suppresses countervailing evidence by terrorizing any scientists who might generate or spread it, leading to a cascade of bad pro-Trans 'studies' in public discussion." (content).

Again: The 2 questions are

1. is content factual
2. is content on topic

When we're discussing cookie recipes and you say "The one from NY Post was funded by Macedonians!!", you're saying something irrelevant - even if factual.

When we're discussing Trans and I mention how systemically one-sided Trans "science" is, I'm saying something very on topic. ONLY REMAINING question is, whether my statement was factual.

See the difference?

Shooting The Messenger is: attacking a messenger / source of content -for reasons so off topic, they obscure- what the topic & content even are.

And that's its purpose, no? People who do it are hand-waving, saying "Don't look there, look here!"

Like when Hillary was caught keeping 30,000 classified documents in her bathroom server, cheating Bernie Sanders out of his delegate wins & destroying evidence - so yall libs said "Russssshiiaaa!"

Like that.

Yall da queens. Can't touch ur crowns.

Back on topic:

I'm sure you have seen my post about repeatedly derailing topics, as well.

He is clearly a racist from his repeated posts about the people of Macedonia and he is a sniveling whiny bitch in that he keeps posting about the links I provide when he can google the topic if he hates the source and/or the people of Macedonia so much.

He refuses to discuss any topic.

His posts are only to attack the source, in a racist rant.

@Spintendo

You're still a whiny sniveling bitch and a racist.

I'm sorry, but this goes way beyond the point of the "polite disagreement" you yourself wrote into the rules for this sub-forum. I realise that you've posted this as a personal comment and not as a mod, but I think this really crosses the line.

"If you want to call your "enemy" a cunt or the like, take it elsewhere."

You're still a whiny sniveling bitch and a racist.

Here are 16 studies which show where gender transitioning care led to better mental health outcomes. Are all these medical publications wrong? And if they are wrong, where is your evidence that they're wrong?

• De Vries, A. L., Steensma, T. D., Doreleijers, T. A., & Cohen‐Kettenis, P. T. (2011). Puberty suppression in adolescents with gender identity disorder: A prospective follow‐up study. The Journal of Sexual Medicine, 8(8), 2276-2283.

• De Vries, A. L., McGuire, J. K., Steensma, T. D., Wagenaar, E. C., Doreleijers, T. A., & Cohen-Kettenis, P. T. (2014). Young adult psychological outcome after puberty suppression and gender reassignment. Pediatrics, 134(4), 696-704.

• Costa, R., Dunsford, M., Skagerberg, E., Holt, V., Carmichael, P., & Colizzi, M. (2015). Psychological support, puberty suppression, and psychosocial functioning in adolescents with gender dysphoria. The Journal of Sexual Medicine, 12(11), 2206-2214.

• Allen, L. R., Watson, L. B., Egan, A. M., & Moser, C. N. (2019). Well-being and suicidality among transgender youth after gender-affirming hormones. Clinical Practice in Pediatric Psychology, 7(3), 302.

• Kaltiala, R., Heino, E., Työläjärvi, M., & Suomalainen, L. (2020). Adolescent development and psychosocial functioning after starting cross-sex hormones for gender dysphoria. Nordic Journal of Psychiatry, 74(3), 213-219.

• de Lara, D. L., Rodríguez, O. P., Flores, I. C., Masa, J. L. P., Campos-Muñoz, L., Hernández, M. C., & Amador, J. T. R. (2020). Psychosocial assessment in transgender adolescents. Anales de Pediatría (English Edition), 93(1), 41-48.

• van der Miesen, A. I., Steensma, T. D., de Vries, A. L., Bos, H., & Popma, A. (2020). Psychological functioning in transgender adolescents before and after gender-affirmative care compared with cisgender general population peers. Journal of Adolescent Health, 66(6), 699-704.

• Achille, C., Taggart, T., Eaton, N. R., Osipoff, J., Tafuri, K., Lane, A., & Wilson, T. A. (2020). Longitudinal impact of gender-affirming endocrine intervention on the mental health and well-being of transgender youths: preliminary results. International Journal of Pediatric Endocrinology, 2020(1), 1-5.

• Kuper, L. E., Stewart, S., Preston, S., Lau, M., & Lopez, X. (2020). Body dissatisfaction and mental health outcomes of youth on gender-affirming hormone therapy. Pediatrics, 145(4).

• Turban, J. L., King, D., Carswell, J. M., & Keuroghlian, A. S. (2020). Pubertal suppression for transgender youth and risk of suicidal ideation. Pediatrics, 145(2).

• Carmichael, P., Butler, G., Masic, U., Cole, T. J., De Stavola, B. L., Davidson, S., ... & Viner, R. M. (2021). Short-term outcomes of pubertal suppression in a selected cohort of 12 to 15 year old young people with persistent gender dysphoria in the UK. PLoS One, 16(2), e0243894.

• Grannis, C., Leibowitz, S. F., Gahn, S., Nahata, L., Morningstar, M., Mattson, W. I., ... & Nelson, E. E. (2021). Testosterone treatment, internalizing symptoms, and body image dissatisfaction in transgender boys. Psychoneuroendocrinology, 132, 105358.

• Hisle-Gorman, E., Schvey, N. A., Adirim, T. A., Rayne, A. K., Susi, A., Roberts, T. A., & Klein, D. A. (2021). Mental healthcare utilization of transgender youth before and after affirming treatment. The Journal of Sexual Medicine, 18(8), 1444-1454.

• Green, A. E., DeChants, J. P., Price, M. N., & Davis, C. K. (2021). Association of gender-affirming hormone therapy with depression, thoughts of suicide, and attempted suicide among transgender and nonbinary youth. Journal of Adolescent Health.

• Turban, J. L., King, D., Kobe, J., Reisner, S. L., & Keuroghlian, A. S. (2022). Access to gender-affirming hormones during adolescence and mental health outcomes among transgender adults. PLoS One, 17(1), e0261039.

• Tordoff, D. M., Wanta, J. W., Collin, A., Stephney, C., Inwards-Breland, D. J., Ahrens, K. (2022) Mental Health Outcomes in Transgender and Nonbinary Youths Receiving Gender-Affirming Care. JAMA Network Open, 5(2), e220978.

As I've explained elsewhere, Trans so-called "science" is famously, FAMOUSLY, politicized, biased, whitewashed.

That sounds a lot like "shoot the messenger" to me. Where is your evidence that it is "famously politicized biased and whitewashed"? Postmillenial.com?

I see with your link to them, youve decided to help bankroll the good people of Macedonia as well. Good for you! With any luck the admins of that site will be able to build their new 3,000sq ft home in Veles.

Countless real people have -horrible- experiences with Trans surgery a.k.a. medical mutilation..... and the lib goes "That's anecdotal! And no reason to keep it from kids! And the regret is scant!"

And even the "lawyer" in him won't spot his business opportunity.

But libs call that "modern"! Libs approve.

@hubrys Look at the pic again.

Can you see the obvious - using your own eyes, forgetting ur lib ideology 1 minute - that it's a pic of extreme self-harm?

PS. I'll post studies when I think you're capable of hearing them.

Already explained to you that, at present, I think you're not.

Right now, you can't even look at a pic of self-harm - something any mentally healthy person would regret - and see the self-harm.

Is that the same science that said that the covid vaxx PREVENTS us fro catching and spreading covid?

Is that the same science that said that masks work?

Is that the same science that said that lockdowns work?

Is that the same science that said we would be currently living in the planet's worst-ever ice age and all the other predictions about the climate?

Science lies for political motives.

NARF lied because they're were homophobes and others lie for their political goals.

As I've explained elsewhere, Trans so-called "science" is famously, FAMOUSLY, politicized, biased, whitewashed.

So, what I'm reading is that you reject modern statistical science, and instead think we should rely on cherry-picked anecdotal science. I see...you're a moron then? Well, that's cleared up then.