You can't help but be a troll.

Keeping being a troll.

Is this english? I think you meant to say "Keep being a troll." I know english can be hard, especially for someone who is scared of a part of speech like a pronoun.

Really, this is quite fun for me. Sometimes I feel bad because I shouldn't really pick on people who have such low intelligence, but hey. Let's keep going.

Keeping being a troll.

I understand that is your point, and I have explained that your point is meaningless.

You could say "Liberals silent on if this rock keeps lions away". It's true, but completely meaningless. It's true, and has absolutely nothing to do with the election. I mean christ. Nobody won the "popular" vote. Not Kari Lake, not Joe Biden. This was a whole bunch of different elections for different candidates, you daft twat.

Dudette, you don't understand the fucking point I was making, either because you are a dumb fuck or a troll, most likely both.

hypocrisy

Dude, you don't understand the difference between the congress and the president! You can't call out hypocrisy on something you don't understand. You are just being a troll. Grow and and take a civics lesson.

You are clearly being a troll.

I call out the stupidity and hypocrisy of the left and you accuse me of it being my idea.

You can't even make a coherent point man. Stop replying, you look stupider and stupider on each reply. Save yourself.

This is why the country is so screwed. Idiots who don't even know what congress is are voting on members of congress.

Take a civics class! Ask around, you might find a kindergarden that would take you in. You can start with finger painting the capital.

Clearly you are too stupid to even understand.

Ah, so you are claiming that because liberals are stupid and don't realize how the government works (my original point) I lose because i can't defend the crackhead liberal logic.

Yeah, that's how it works.

I will take it as a loss for you. That seems a bit more fair. Would you agree, dearie?

Ok, dearie.

Enjoy what you believe is a win.

I guess I'll take that as a win. Fun chat!

OK, dearie.

You clearly are a liberal.

Liberals want the country run/controlled by the popular vote

facts not in evidence.

The president represents the entire country. Congress members represent their district. Within each area a popular vote makes sense.

You are conflating represent with "run" or "control" which is not something that "liberals" have done. You have done it but not liberals.

Let's break this down a bit:

Do you understand the difference between "control" and "represent"?

Do you understand that congress as a whole "runs" the country, but that the members of congress don't have that individual task. Their job contribues to the group task but is not the same.

Ah, so Congress (with the President) does run the country. Fucking WOW.

Now back to the original point.

Liberals want the country run/controlled by the popular vote, except when the popular vote is red. I know that's a difficult concept for you.

You people do have a short attention span. It was that long ago you were advocating for it.

I will quote myself here:
"Congress as a whole runs the country. How it does that is a system called representative democracy. All of the representatives from all of the districts around the country meet in the House of Representatives where as a whole body debate and pass laws that govern the country."

So where in that, or in anything I have said here, has given you any indication that I am saying "Congress has no say in how the US runs"?

I didn't, and you can't find that.

So now what you will say is "I can't be assed to point it out" - back to that one, am I right?

Ok, dearie.

You are right, Congress has no say in how the US is run.

"Clearly, you don't get my point and I can't be assed to keep trying to explain it to you." - This is shorthand for "I have clearly lost this discussion and since I have no relevant point to stand on I need to find an exit quickly"

You can't keep trying to explain it? Perhaps try explaining it once. You haven't yet.

You have conflated representation with "running" as in "Congress runs the entire country". That is the closest you have come here to an explaination - a complete mischaracterization of how Congress works.

If your point is so weak that a basic explaination of your point eludes you, I think you might be missing the point competely.

I know how the US government works.

Clearly, you don't get my point and I can't be assed to keep trying to explain it to you.

I have no time for people like @hubrys. He's just a troll.

Congress as a whole runs the country. How it does that is a system called representative democracy. All of the representatives from all of the districts around the country meet in the House of Representatives where as a whole body debate and pass laws that govern the country. The body runs the country, however each individual representative is there to represent their district. Lauren Boebert was elected by the voters in Colorado's 3rd district to represent them in the House, where she could bring up issues and a point of view that represents her constituents - the members of her district.

This is done because the needs of Colorado's 3rd district are often quite different than the needs of New York's 14th district. All the member's of the house can represent the needs of the their district in discussions about how to run the whole country.

This representative democracy is common in many places. In Canada they elect members of the House of Parliament. Each member then represents the people in their area in debates and passing laws in the House of Parliament.

So, again, there is no "popular vote" for the House of Representatives as a whole. That would be quite impossible as it would defeat the point of this "representative" democracy. There are 435 individual popular votes that elect the 435 Representatives in the house.

I don't know if this is helping at all. I feel like you just want to "own the libs" and this is your attempt - and it's hard to back down from that position. This is why I was trying to ask you more questions about what you think a better system might be, perhaps one that actually does help represent the will of the people in a representative democracy a bit more - one that could help aleviate the problems of gerrymandering perhaps.

If you just want to "own the libs" then I think it's imporant to get the basics right here. So far you have demonstrated a lack of understanding of basic civics but honestly, not much else.

Here is some information about Representative Democracy, this might help you hone your arguments in the future. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Representative_democracy