<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" version="2.0"><channel><title><![CDATA[Major Scientific Publisher Retracts More Than 500 Papers]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p dir="auto"><a href="https://resistthemainstream.org/major-scientific-publisher-retracts-more-than-500-papers" rel="nofollow ugc">https://resistthemainstream.org/major-scientific-publisher-retracts-more-than-500-papers</a></p>
<p dir="auto">I guess the peer review process isn't as wonderful as some claim.</p>
<p dir="auto">When someone says "but it's not peer-reviewed" remember this article.</p>
]]></description><link>https://community.gaytor.rent/topic/59946/major-scientific-publisher-retracts-more-than-500-papers</link><generator>RSS for Node</generator><lastBuildDate>Mon, 13 Apr 2026 17:42:40 GMT</lastBuildDate><atom:link href="https://community.gaytor.rent/topic/59946.rss" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/><pubDate>Wed, 05 Oct 2022 03:42:05 GMT</pubDate><ttl>60</ttl></channel></rss>