OK, dearie

@hubrys

It's strange that only I only ever hear what Qanon believes from liberals.

I'm guessing you guys get your news from Democratic Underground.

Your lack of curiosity re: Q-Anon is telling... afraid you'll find your source material and discover just how much bullshit you've been "consuming" lately?

You might want to look into things.

Pew says that more liberals read WSJ than do conservatives.

TheFactual.com says WSJ is left of center and has a 64.x% accuracy rating.

You need to pay attention to the rules.

"Retard", "tard" and the like are not allowed here.

It's strange that only I only ever hear what Qanon believes from liberals.

[https://www.wsj.com/articles/what-is-qanon-what-we-know-about-the-conspiracy-theory-11597694801](link url)

There's a high-level summation. And if you think the Wall Street Journal is "liberal," then you are a <monumentally stupid person whose level of ignorance and lack of cognitive ability is truly and magnificently staggering.>

Edited for compliance with the rules.

It's strange that only I only ever hear what Qanon believes from liberals.

I'm guessing you guys get your news from Democratic Underground.

No, he's taking joy in the fact that the sicko child molester was - in any way or at any time - associated with the Clinton's.

Clearly what's going on is that the Clintons are in on a global child-molestation ring wherein they extract brain chemicals from the abused children in order to make immortality potions for wealthy Liberal elites. And, God, I wish that last sentence was a joke and not literally what some QAnon people truly believe.

LOL, you are a priceless ass clown.

You claim that everyone who supports Trump is X, Y, and Z.

I don't understand what the point of this post is supposed to be. Are you trying to allege that the Clintons knew Corrigan Clay was a child molester when they started working with his ex-wife's charitable organizations? What's your evidence for that?

If that's not your point, then how does this man being a child molester in any way tarnish the charitable good that the Clinton Foundation attempted to do here?

Are you just taking joy in the fact that a minor was physically, sexually, and emotionally damaged because it might, in your twisted mind, harm the Clintons? Geez, you mean your hatred of the Clinton's is greater than your empathy for children? Shame on you!

No, he's taking joy in the fact that the sicko child molester was - in any way or at any time - associated with the Clinton's.

Guilt by association - a common Trumpite tactic...

If that's not your point, then how does this man being a child molester in any way tarnish the charitable good that the Clinton Foundation attempted to do here?

Are you just taking joy in the fact that a minor was physically, sexually, and emotionally damaged because it might, in your twisted mind, harm the Clintons? Geez, you mean your hatred of the Clinton's is greater than your empathy for children? Shame on you!