You are correct, in part.

A black criminal being lawfully shot by police requires a leftist Presidential response.

A white kid defending his life from white criminals required a response from both a leftist candidate for President and later President because the kid needs to be called a white supremacist.

A black nationalist and career criminal doing a domestic terror attack on white people does not require a leftist Presidential response, according to you leftist.

@bi4smooth

But your BFF is the President.

True, only the "crimes" that can be racialized need a Presidential visit, according to liberals.

You can't imagine any part of life or existence separate from your polarized, politicized glasses, can you?

This didn't rise to the level of a Presidential response... and you're upset by that?

If it HAD received a Presidential response, what would your reaction have been then?

You're like the obese woman who asks her boyfriend "do I look fat in this dress?" - there is NO good answer to that question! It's a trap! LOL

But your BFF is the President.

True, only the "crimes" that can be racialized need a Presidential visit, according to liberals.

Jen Psaki has said that Biden won't be visiting with the families of those killed in the Waukesha terrorist attack.

Biden has met with Jacob Blake and others.

Clearly, Biden loves black criminals (just like BLM admits they support) but doesn't give a fuck about the victims of black criminals.

I don't see Trump lining up to go visit them!

Not EVERY crime victim needs to get a visit from the President (or ex-President) for the crime to be important! (All crime matters - all crime victims are... well, victims!) But not all crime (or their victims) are "created equally"...