https://rumble.com/vpbem2-blm-leader-storms-off-set-after-destroyed-in-debate.html

Your buddy refusing to condemn riots.

Nah, you're just spewing Chinese/DNC propaganda.

@bi4smooth

Well, as a Biden lover, you are a Russian troll, CCP agent, and a DNC member.

Let's not forget that your beloved liberal media spent years lying about Russian collusion by Trump, the Covington kids, Kyle, and countless other things.

So I don't trust anything you say.

You go boy! RANT HEAVEN

I let my record speak for itself on all of those counts...

FWIW: I am not the one re-posting bogus news accounts from Russian misinformation / troll farms!

Give Putin's balls a nudge, will ya?

Well, as a Biden lover, you are a Russian troll, CCP agent, and a DNC member.

Let's not forget that your beloved liberal media spent years lying about Russian collusion by Trump, the Covington kids, Kyle, and countless other things.

So I don't trust anything you say.

@bi4smooth

You have a well-documented habit of posting from liberal sites.

It's funny that I post a link to the actual video, but you don't like it, claiming that it is out of context but I can't find a video where he "predicts" rather than threatens.

Outside right-wing extremist media, this isn't a story... at all! It's not there because it's not newsworthy to them.

My comment that it was a prediction, not a threat, came from PRINTED material, not video... because when the right-wing media twisted his comments, he posted the transcript of the entire statement, not just the snippet that's being played on the media.

Just because your Russian friends/handlers think it's newsworthy, doesn't mean the rest of the (non-Trump) world agrees!

You have a well-documented habit of posting from liberal sites.

It's funny that I post a link to the actual video, but you don't like it, claiming that it is out of context but I can't find a video where he "predicts" rather than threatens.

@bi4smooth

I've seen the video posted by a lot of different people.

Why haven't I seen it on your beloved liberal media?

This will come as a shocker!, I'm sure:

• I am not an editor for any media outlet - I'm just a lowly system architect (computer consultant) for a US federal contractor...
• I do not love any media - I don't even have any favorites - I think they're mostly all corrupt and profit-driven (vs. the news media of old who were information and public-service driven)

As such, I cannot answer for them... unlike some, I try NOT to put words into other people's mouths - at least not without making it clear!

I've seen the video posted by a lot of different people.

Why haven't I seen it on your beloved liberal media?

Ok, I was trying to be nice, but I guess we will go back to our usual routine.

You do you, Feng Feng and I'll do me.

@bi4smooth

Did you even see the video?

He clearly said, "We will take to the streets. There will be riots, there will be fires and there will be bloodshed".

The clip was edited - unsurprisingly, since if they played it in full context, it would likely match what was reported elsewhere: that he PREDICTED that would be the result, nor that he THREATENED that would be the result.

Anyway, you again miss the salient facts, instead focusing in the minutiae - with particular focus on ensuring your every assertion is agreed upon in its full entirety! (Ego much?)

The important facts here are that the Dems got themselves another liberal Mayor of NYC, and the bitch ain't even installed yet and the left-wing "progressives" are already attacking him as not being liberal enough! BLM is attacking him as-if he wasn't also a black man! As-if he didn't know what it was like, being black in NYC!

GOD I love it when Liberals turn cannibalistic!

They've been doing it in Congress since Biden and the new congress took office earlier this year (why SHIT has been passed so far - though this Infrastructure bill is a rare sign that they might be able to take each others dicks out of their mouths long enough to get something done! Which is too bad.... not that we didn't need the Infrastructure spending - we did - but this will be seen as a Biden "win", and he's been so GOOD at failing so far! LOL)

@bi4smooth

OK, you are clearly too stupid to get that constantly calling me a Russian troll, is the issue I'm talking about.

But, you do you, you CCP/DNC agent.

R.O.F.L

You constantly troll me as a "liberal" and a Pelosi acolyte (though are far less polite about it) - yet I refer to you as one of your primary sources, and that's too much for you?

DAMN you have thin-skin, bitch!

You REALLY ARE like Trump! In SO MANY WAYS!

BTW: You should Google "Lampooning" - which, if you re-read my note earlier is EXACTLY what I said I did to you when you "Trumpified" yourself with your "holier than thou, I'm infallible and so are my sources" attitude...

Where I have a problem with you, on here, is your Trump-inspired supposition (assertion) that any disagreement with, or deviation from, your "line" - no matter how small - is a complete and utter desertion of all you stand-for - nay, all that is right and good in this world! ... And that's just silly.... thus, I lampoon you when you do it...

Oh, and I fully intend to continue to call you out on that ego-trip that is sourced from His Royal Silliness, Donald J Trump - but you seem to think is yours too!

Did you even see the video?

He clearly said, "We will take to the streets. There will be riots, there will be fires and there will be bloodshed".

OK, you are clearly too stupid to get that constantly calling me a Russian troll, is the issue I'm talking about.

But, you do you, you CCP/DNC agent.

@bi4smooth

You insist on trying to discredit me, while you are a CCP/DNC agent.

That's all I was saying.

How did I discredit you - other than your choice of source. Your original post was literally little more than a link to an outside story with a 1-liner that clearly was a response to the headline alone.

You take things too personally... whats' more, you assume nearly everything I write is directed at you... and that's not the case... by a LONG shot!

The problem isn't you - it's the "uprising" of the extremist media and their insipid characterizations of "the other side" as evil, misguided fools - as anyone can plainly see! - if you just buy into their content!

I'm not shooting at the messenger, just the message!

Where I have a problem with you, on here, is your Trump-inspired supposition (assertion) that any disagreement with, or deviation from, your "line" - no matter how small - is a complete and utter desertion of all you stand-for - nay, all that is right and good in this world! ... And that's just silly.... thus, I lampoon you when you do it...

You insist on trying to discredit me, while you are a CCP/DNC agent.

That's all I was saying.

@bi4smooth

Ok Feng Feng, whatever you say.

Just curious: when I reply to your post, agreeing with much of the story it relays, while also decrying the unnecessary hyperbole, why do you even feel the need to reply to me? Esp. in such a useless way?

You know, one of my daughters - when she was 12 and got her first cell phone - absolutely HAD to be the last-to-text.. "OK", "fine", "Yes", "No" - whatever, she HAD to be the last to text -- if you replied to her "OK" with "Great!", she would reply something else... her older brother tried to see if there was a limit (he could be a douche at that age) - 30+ worthless texts later, he gave up!

Is this you?

Ok Feng Feng, whatever you say.

@raphjd Why u are so obsessed with black people?
You only starts discussion involving these people...

Umm, you have no idea what you are talking about.

https://thepostmillennial.com/blm-threatens-riots-if-mayor-elect-adams-reinstitutes-nypd-anti-crime-units?utm_campaign=64470

There will be riots, fire, and bloodshed if NYC tries to fight crime.

It goes back to the video I previously posted where BLM admits that they are there solely to protect black criminals.

I do LOVE IT when the Dems elect one of their own to office & then immediately turn on them when they don't "toe the line" on every liberal (aka: progressive) nutball idea out there!

But, in typical @raphjd fashion (ok, typical Russian Misinformation Troll-Farm fashion), he takes Dem infighting and proclaims it a nuclear conflict!

Once again, read your own story:

• a NYC BLM leader, Hawk Newsome, predicted (not threatened) that there may be "bloodshed & riots" if newly elected NYC Mayor Eric Adams (a Black Man) keeps his campaign promise of reinstating the NYPD undercover anti-crime unit - one that previously had been targeted at (nearly exclusively) Black & Latino neighborhoods, and disbanded in 2020 as a result.
• When shown the Right-Wing media reports (like @raphjd's source) - proclaiming a threat of violence, Newsome himself claimed that he was talking about Adams' campaign promises - and noted that when he personally spoke to Mayor-Elect Adams on Wednesday, he was bothered that they "didn't offer a comment on police reform" during those talks.
• Newsome did re-iterate that his group would (again) take action should they feel the NYPD is targeting their community, stating "We will be at his front door, we will be at Gracie Mansion, we will be in the streets if he allows these police to abuse us."
• But Newsome also clarified in the same, written, statement: "I am not threatening anyone. I am just saying that it's a natural response to aggressive oppression, people will react."
• On Thursday, Mayor-Elect Adams reiterated his campaign vow to reinstate the plainclothes cop units. He also downplayed Newsome's comments regarding an uproar occurring if the undercover cops return, stating: "They didn't say any of that in the meeting" Wednesday.
• Adams added: "I ran on a very clear message: My city will not be unsafe and that is what we're going to do. Clear plan: Putting together a plainclothes anti-gun unit—that will happen—and the city is going to be safe."
• Adams also took a shot, Thursday, at the power of Newsome's group (one of several under the BLM "banner" in NYC), telling the NY Post that the group is "not representative of the Black Lives Matter movement" and adding (regarding the "threats" of violence as the Post was reporting) that he didn't think their group "had the power" to organize itself that widely.

So - lots of important parts to the story, but no threats of riots (just predictions that they would come if the NYPD targeted their communities again).

More importantly (to my mind): this is just more PROOF that the Dems can't govern! For all of their pie-in-the-sky talk when they're on the outside looking in, they can't even agree to fight crime during a crime wave when they're "in power"....

Personally, while I love the anti-Dem reporting, I could do without the hyperbolic twisting of the facts... they (Dems) SUCK at actual governing well enough, we don't have to give them ammunition to argue back by inflating the truth!