Are you, of all people, playing the victim?

Seriously?!

@bi4smooth

LIAR!!!!

You and Feng Feng need to come up with a better lie.

I never said anything is "against" me.

You never did answer if you can taste Swallwell's cock when you snortch Feng Feng's vag.

You're pathetic ... this has devolved into nothing but a trading of insults - the last discussion of facts or opinions was days ago... this isn't worth the time

You can win the insult war - I couldn't care less about your opinion of me...

LIAR!!!!

You and Feng Feng need to come up with a better lie.

I never said anything is "against" me.

You never did answer if you can taste Swallwell's cock when you snortch Feng Feng's vag.

@bi4smooth

Still sucking Fauci's ass, I see.

Anything not 100% in-line with your hyperbolic spin is against you... paranoid much?

Still sucking Fauci's ass, I see.

https://thehill.com/changing-america/well-being/medical-advances/578086-bipartisan-legislators-demand-answers-from-fauci

Dr. Fauci is a man - just a man. Not the Devil incarnate, not inhabited by an evil spirit, and not someone intent on harming people. That said, he is apparently the focus of many a nightmare for @raphjd!

Still, I'm pretty sure Fauci didn't drug any puppies himself - but he is answerable for the actions of his Department! If these allegations prove true, there will be hell-to-pay from MOC. Read carefully tho - "part of a $375K grant" could mean $100 to cover phone bills, for all we know yet! That doesn't mean the NIH role was minimal, just that it really hasn't been outlined AT ALL except to say "part of a $375K grant" went to this lab.

The sad part is, tho even if this is entirely TRUE, in all its worst forms - the lab in Tunisia likely didn't break any laws in Tunisia, and because the NIH sent this grant money "over there", they likely didn't break any US Laws either (albeint they certainly would be guilty of breaking "human decency" laws-of-common-sense)!

As a society, we rely HEAVILY on testing: food safety testing, cosmetics testing (remember the rabbits with their eyes propped open revealed in the 70's or 80's?), drug testing, you name it!

It's more expensive (and slower) to test without using (abusing) animals... but, while THAT is the morally right thing to do, but with businesses today hyper-focused on short-term-profits, it's not surprising that they'd take "shortcuts"...

Gov't doesn't answer to shareholders, tho - there should be no excuse for taking shortcuts with Gov't funded research!

MOC are demanding answers... for now, we can all share our moral outrage that this happened at all (if it, indeed, really DID happen - it's not unlike special-interest groups to highly exaggerate Gov't actions (or in-actions) to get attention for their cause!)... and wait for the outcome of the investigations!